Software Quality through the Eyes of the End-User and Static Analysis Tools: A Study on Android OSS Applications

Kamonphop Srisopha, Reem Alfayez
{"title":"Software Quality through the Eyes of the End-User and Static Analysis Tools: A Study on Android OSS Applications","authors":"Kamonphop Srisopha, Reem Alfayez","doi":"10.1145/3194095.3194096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Source code analysis tools have been the vehicle for measuring and assessing the quality of a software product for decades. However, recently many studies have shown that post-deployment end-user reviews provide a wealth of insight into the quality of a software product and how it should evolve and be maintained. For example, end-user reviews help to identify missing features or inform developers about incorrect or unexpected software behavior. We believe that analyzing end-user reviews and utilizing analysis tools are a crucial step towards understanding the complete picture of the quality of a software product, as well as towards reasoning about the evolution history of it. In this paper, we investigate whether both methods correlate with one another. In other words, we explore if there exists a relationship between user satisfaction and the application's internal quality characteristics. To conduct our research, we analyze a total of 46 actual releases of three Android open source software (OSS) applications on the Google Play Store. For each release, we employ multiple static analysis tools to assess several aspects of the application's software quality. We retrieve and manually analyze the complete reviews after each release of each application from its store page, totaling 1004 reviews. Our initial results suggest that having high or low code quality does not necessary ensure user overall satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":103582,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Qualities and their Dependencies (SQUADE)","volume":"346 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Qualities and their Dependencies (SQUADE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3194095.3194096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Source code analysis tools have been the vehicle for measuring and assessing the quality of a software product for decades. However, recently many studies have shown that post-deployment end-user reviews provide a wealth of insight into the quality of a software product and how it should evolve and be maintained. For example, end-user reviews help to identify missing features or inform developers about incorrect or unexpected software behavior. We believe that analyzing end-user reviews and utilizing analysis tools are a crucial step towards understanding the complete picture of the quality of a software product, as well as towards reasoning about the evolution history of it. In this paper, we investigate whether both methods correlate with one another. In other words, we explore if there exists a relationship between user satisfaction and the application's internal quality characteristics. To conduct our research, we analyze a total of 46 actual releases of three Android open source software (OSS) applications on the Google Play Store. For each release, we employ multiple static analysis tools to assess several aspects of the application's software quality. We retrieve and manually analyze the complete reviews after each release of each application from its store page, totaling 1004 reviews. Our initial results suggest that having high or low code quality does not necessary ensure user overall satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终端用户眼中的软件质量与静态分析工具——基于Android OSS应用的研究
几十年来,源代码分析工具一直是衡量和评估软件产品质量的工具。然而,最近许多研究表明,部署后的最终用户评审为软件产品的质量以及它应该如何发展和维护提供了丰富的见解。例如,终端用户评审有助于识别缺失的特性,或者告知开发人员不正确或意外的软件行为。我们相信分析最终用户评论和利用分析工具是理解软件产品质量全貌的关键一步,也是推理软件产品的演化历史的关键一步。在本文中,我们研究了这两种方法是否相互关联。换句话说,我们探索用户满意度和应用程序的内部质量特征之间是否存在关系。为了进行研究,我们分析了Google Play Store上总共46个实际发行的三款Android开源软件(OSS)应用程序。对于每个版本,我们使用多个静态分析工具来评估应用程序软件质量的几个方面。我们检索并手动分析每个应用程序在其商店页面发布后的完整评论,总共有1004条评论。我们的初步结果表明,代码质量的高低并不能保证用户的总体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Software Quality through the Eyes of the End-User and Static Analysis Tools: A Study on Android OSS Applications Learning-Based Response Time Analysis in Real-Time Embedded Systems: A Simulation-Based Approach The Quality of Junit Tests: An Empirical Study Report Timing Verification of Component-Based Vehicle Software with Rubus-ICE: End-User's Experience Prioritizing Alerts from Multiple Static Analysis Tools, Using Classification Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1