Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Filtering-Based Predictors of Scores in Surveys of a Large Company

M. F. Oliveira, M. Delgado, R. Lüders
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Filtering-Based Predictors of Scores in Surveys of a Large Company","authors":"M. F. Oliveira, M. Delgado, R. Lüders","doi":"10.5753/eniac.2021.18299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative Filtering (CF) can be understood as the process of predicting the preferences of users and deriving useful patterns by studying their activities. In the survey context, it can be used to predict answers to questions as combinations of other available answers. In this paper, we aim to test five CF-based algorithms (item-item, iterative matrix factorization, neural collaborative filtering, logistic matrix factorization, and an ensemble of them) to estimate scores in four survey applications (checkpoints) composed of 700,000 employee's ratings. These data have been collected from 2019 to 2020 by a large Brazilian tech company with more than 10,000 employees. The results show that collaborative filtering approaches provide relevant alternatives to score questions of surveys. They provided good quality estimates. This result can be further explored to eventually reduce the size of questionnaires, avoiding burden phenomena faced by respondents when dealing with large surveys.","PeriodicalId":318676,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XVIII Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2021)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XVIII Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2021.18299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative Filtering (CF) can be understood as the process of predicting the preferences of users and deriving useful patterns by studying their activities. In the survey context, it can be used to predict answers to questions as combinations of other available answers. In this paper, we aim to test five CF-based algorithms (item-item, iterative matrix factorization, neural collaborative filtering, logistic matrix factorization, and an ensemble of them) to estimate scores in four survey applications (checkpoints) composed of 700,000 employee's ratings. These data have been collected from 2019 to 2020 by a large Brazilian tech company with more than 10,000 employees. The results show that collaborative filtering approaches provide relevant alternatives to score questions of surveys. They provided good quality estimates. This result can be further explored to eventually reduce the size of questionnaires, avoiding burden phenomena faced by respondents when dealing with large surveys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某大公司问卷调查中基于协同过滤的分数预测因子的比较分析
协同过滤(CF)可以理解为通过研究用户的活动来预测用户的偏好并得出有用模式的过程。在调查上下文中,它可以作为其他可用答案的组合来预测问题的答案。在本文中,我们的目标是测试五种基于cf的算法(item-item,迭代矩阵分解,神经协同过滤,逻辑矩阵分解和它们的集合),以估计由700,000名员工评分组成的四个调查应用程序(检查点)的分数。这些数据是由一家拥有1万多名员工的巴西大型科技公司从2019年到2020年收集的。结果表明,协同过滤方法为问卷调查问题的评分提供了相关的选择。他们提供了高质量的评估。这一结果可以进一步探讨,最终减少问卷的规模,避免被调查者在处理大型调查时面临负担现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance analysis of machine learning algorithms trained on biased data An iterated local search for the travelling salesman problem Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Filtering-Based Predictors of Scores in Surveys of a Large Company Uma Abordagem de Agrupamento Automático de Dados Baseada na Otimização por Busca em Grupo Memética Detection of weapon possession and fire in Public Safety surveillance cameras
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1