Institutional Context and Energy-Efficient Innovation: Are SMEs Flying Under the Radar?

Boris Mrkajic, L. Grilli, P. Garrone
{"title":"Institutional Context and Energy-Efficient Innovation: Are SMEs Flying Under the Radar?","authors":"Boris Mrkajic, L. Grilli, P. Garrone","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2527940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relying on the institutional theory, a conceptual framework is developed, which hypothesises that institutional features are creating an environment that significantly influences energy-efficient innovation (EEI) activities at a firm level. Economic, regulatory and social features are argued to support firms, but also exert pressures on them to introduce EEI. Furthermore, the analysis is extended to study how the institutional context is moderated by one of the most prominent features of a firm, i.e. its size. In this way, we contribute both to the literature examining the role of the institutional context in shaping economic activities, and the scientific and policy discourse on energy-efficiency in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and large incumbent enterprises (LEs). The developed hypotheses are tested in a cross-country setting, using a cross-sectional sample of 9 European countries based on Community Innovation Survey (CIS) microdata, complemented with country-level information from various sources. The achieved results support the main hypothesis that institutional characteristics foster EEI. Moreover, different institutional dimensions are found to be working differently depending on the firm size. Compared to LEs, SMEs are found to be more sensitive to regulatory rather than economic and social institutional characteristics. We offer several interpretations for these somewhat controversial and thought-provoking results. Based on these, we propose implications for policy interventions that could enhance the quality of energy-efficient innovation activities, as well as insightful findings to managers of both small and large corporations.","PeriodicalId":186074,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Product Development Strategy & Organization (Topic)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Product Development Strategy & Organization (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2527940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relying on the institutional theory, a conceptual framework is developed, which hypothesises that institutional features are creating an environment that significantly influences energy-efficient innovation (EEI) activities at a firm level. Economic, regulatory and social features are argued to support firms, but also exert pressures on them to introduce EEI. Furthermore, the analysis is extended to study how the institutional context is moderated by one of the most prominent features of a firm, i.e. its size. In this way, we contribute both to the literature examining the role of the institutional context in shaping economic activities, and the scientific and policy discourse on energy-efficiency in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and large incumbent enterprises (LEs). The developed hypotheses are tested in a cross-country setting, using a cross-sectional sample of 9 European countries based on Community Innovation Survey (CIS) microdata, complemented with country-level information from various sources. The achieved results support the main hypothesis that institutional characteristics foster EEI. Moreover, different institutional dimensions are found to be working differently depending on the firm size. Compared to LEs, SMEs are found to be more sensitive to regulatory rather than economic and social institutional characteristics. We offer several interpretations for these somewhat controversial and thought-provoking results. Based on these, we propose implications for policy interventions that could enhance the quality of energy-efficient innovation activities, as well as insightful findings to managers of both small and large corporations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度背景与节能创新:中小企业是否被忽视?
基于制度理论,本文提出了一个概念框架,该框架假设制度特征正在创造一个显著影响企业层面节能创新(EEI)活动的环境。人们认为经济、监管和社会特征支持企业,但也对它们施加压力,促使它们引入EEI。此外,分析扩展到研究制度背景如何被公司最突出的特征之一,即其规模所调节。通过这种方式,我们既为研究制度背景在塑造经济活动中的作用的文献做出了贡献,也为中小企业(SMEs)和大型现有企业(LEs)的能源效率的科学和政策话语做出了贡献。根据社区创新调查(CIS)的微观数据,利用9个欧洲国家的横截面样本,并辅以来自各种来源的国家级信息,在跨国环境中对所提出的假设进行了检验。研究结果支持了制度特征促进经济创新的主要假设。此外,不同的制度维度会根据企业规模的不同而产生不同的作用。与低成本企业相比,中小企业对监管而不是经济和社会制度特征更为敏感。我们对这些有些争议和发人深省的结果提供了几种解释。在此基础上,我们提出了可以提高节能创新活动质量的政策干预的启示,以及对小型和大型企业管理者的深刻见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Innovation in the Financial Services - The Magic Bullet The Value of Legal Protection of Novel Product Designs: Evidence from Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa Apple's Key Success Factors in the UK that Could Be Learned and Applied by Other Companies from the Same Industry Innovation and Product Market Concentration: Schumpeter, Arrow and the Inverted-U Shape Curve Barriers to Eco-Innovation in the LED Sector: A Multilevel Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1