Self-Stabilizing ℓ-Exclusion Revisited

Fabienne Carrier, A. Datta, Stéphane Devismes, L. Larmore
{"title":"Self-Stabilizing ℓ-Exclusion Revisited","authors":"Fabienne Carrier, A. Datta, Stéphane Devismes, L. Larmore","doi":"10.1145/2684464.2684465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the (deterministic) ℓ-exclusion problem, a generalization of the mutual exclusion problem which allows use of 1 ≤ ℓ < n identical copies of a non-sharable reusable resource among n processes, instead of only one, as standard mutual exclusion. This problem is defined using three properties: safety, fairness, and avoidance of ℓ-deadlock. We first show that any algorithm satisfying the three aforementioned properties has a waiting time of Ω(n − ℓ) rounds. Thus, when n is large, the gain (in terms of waiting time) of having ℓ copies of a resource, instead of one, becomes negligible. We propose to reformulate the problem by replacing the avoidance of ℓ-deadlock property by a new property, which we call fast waiting time, which requires waiting time of O(n/ℓ) rounds, which is asymptotically optimal. We call this new version of the problem fast waiting time ℓ-exclusion. We give two self-stabilizing solutions for this new problem. Our first solution works in oriented rooted ring networks. Our second solution is a generalization of the first, and works in every connected identified network.","PeriodicalId":298587,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2684464.2684465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We consider the (deterministic) ℓ-exclusion problem, a generalization of the mutual exclusion problem which allows use of 1 ≤ ℓ < n identical copies of a non-sharable reusable resource among n processes, instead of only one, as standard mutual exclusion. This problem is defined using three properties: safety, fairness, and avoidance of ℓ-deadlock. We first show that any algorithm satisfying the three aforementioned properties has a waiting time of Ω(n − ℓ) rounds. Thus, when n is large, the gain (in terms of waiting time) of having ℓ copies of a resource, instead of one, becomes negligible. We propose to reformulate the problem by replacing the avoidance of ℓ-deadlock property by a new property, which we call fast waiting time, which requires waiting time of O(n/ℓ) rounds, which is asymptotically optimal. We call this new version of the problem fast waiting time ℓ-exclusion. We give two self-stabilizing solutions for this new problem. Our first solution works in oriented rooted ring networks. Our second solution is a generalization of the first, and works in every connected identified network.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自稳定的不相容
我们考虑了(确定性)r -不相容问题,它是n个进程中允许使用1≤r < n个相同副本的不可共享可重用资源,而不是只有一个,作为标准的r -不相容问题。这个问题是用三个属性来定义的:安全性、公平性和避免死锁。我们首先证明了任何满足上述三个性质的算法的等待时间为Ω(n−n)轮。因此,当n很大时,拥有一个资源的1个副本而不是1个副本的增益(以等待时间计算)变得可以忽略不计。我们提出用一个新的性质来代替避免死锁的性质,我们称之为快速等待时间,它需要O(n/ r)轮的等待时间,这是渐近最优的。我们称这个问题的新版本为快速等待时间-不相容。对这一新问题给出了两个自稳定解。我们的第一个解决方案适用于定向根环网络。我们的第二个解决方案是第一个解决方案的泛化,并且适用于所有连接的已识别网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distributed Computation of Sparse Cuts via Random Walks Self-Stabilizing ℓ-Exclusion Revisited Optimally Resilient Asynchronous MPC with Linear Communication Complexity OPCAM: Optimal Algorithms Implementing Causal Memories in Shared Memory Systems Solving Consensus in Opportunistic Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1