A user-centered, modular authorization service built on an RBAC foundation

M. Zurko, Richard T. Simon, T. Sanfilippo
{"title":"A user-centered, modular authorization service built on an RBAC foundation","authors":"M. Zurko, Richard T. Simon, T. Sanfilippo","doi":"10.1109/SECPRI.1999.766718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological acceptability has been mentioned as a requirement for secure systems for as long as least privilege and fail safe defaults, but until now has been all but ignored in the actual design of secure systems. We place this principle at the center of our design for Adage, an authorization service for distributed applications. We employ usability design techniques to specify and test the features of our authorization language and the corresponding administrative GUI. Our testing results reinforce our initial design center and suggest directions for deployment of our authorization services. A modular architecture allows us to experiment with our design during short term integration, and evolve it for longer term exploration. An RBAC foundation enables coherent design of flexible authorization constraints and queries. We discuss lessons learned from the implementation of this service through a planned deployment in a context that must balance new research in risk management with dependencies on legacy services.","PeriodicalId":204019,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.99CB36344)","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"103","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.99CB36344)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.1999.766718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

Abstract

Psychological acceptability has been mentioned as a requirement for secure systems for as long as least privilege and fail safe defaults, but until now has been all but ignored in the actual design of secure systems. We place this principle at the center of our design for Adage, an authorization service for distributed applications. We employ usability design techniques to specify and test the features of our authorization language and the corresponding administrative GUI. Our testing results reinforce our initial design center and suggest directions for deployment of our authorization services. A modular architecture allows us to experiment with our design during short term integration, and evolve it for longer term exploration. An RBAC foundation enables coherent design of flexible authorization constraints and queries. We discuss lessons learned from the implementation of this service through a planned deployment in a context that must balance new research in risk management with dependencies on legacy services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以用户为中心的模块化授权服务,构建在RBAC基础上
心理上的可接受性被认为是安全系统的一项必要条件,只要存在最小的特权和故障安全默认值,但直到现在,在安全系统的实际设计中几乎一直被忽略。我们将这一原则置于Adage(分布式应用程序的授权服务)设计的中心。我们使用可用性设计技术来指定和测试我们的授权语言和相应的管理GUI的特性。我们的测试结果加强了我们最初的设计中心,并为授权服务的部署提供了指导。模块化架构允许我们在短期集成期间对设计进行实验,并为长期探索对其进行改进。RBAC基础支持灵活的授权约束和查询的一致设计。我们将讨论通过在必须平衡风险管理新研究与遗留服务依赖关系的上下文中的计划部署从该服务的实现中获得的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A data mining framework for building intrusion detection models Verification of control flow based security properties Network security: then and now or 20 years in 10 minutes The future is not assured-but it should be A user-centered, modular authorization service built on an RBAC foundation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1