Liquidation As Going Concern Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

Ashmika Agrawal
{"title":"Liquidation As Going Concern Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law","authors":"Ashmika Agrawal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3527389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as IBC, 2016) has been enacted to give effect to a highly time bound process for insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals. The objective is speedy resolution and maximizing recovery for lenders. The IBC, 2016 provides for a framework in which an Interim Resolution Professional shall carry on the business operations of the corporate as a going concern until the Committee of Creditors proposes a resolution plan that would keep the business of the corporate post insolvency resolution. On incidence of failure of the resolution plan, liquidation of the corporate person takes place. However, when liquidation of a corporate person takes place by sale of corporate debtor or its business as going concern; the person does not get dissolved and continues to exist in market as a going concern entity. The provision for this feature of liquidation was first inserted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018 w.e.f. 1-4-2018 under Regulation 32 which provided for ‘Manner of sale’. Further, the provision was amended by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2018, w.e.f 22-10-2018. The Second Amendment substituted the previous title of ‘Manner of Sale’ with ‘Sale of Assets, etc.’ the provisions which provides for liquidation as going concern are clause (e) and (f) of Regulation 32 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. ‘Going Concern’ is a concept of accounting and it’s relation with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy law will be examined in this study, with primary focus upon, the need for the concept of liquidation as going concern under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law.","PeriodicalId":137765,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as IBC, 2016) has been enacted to give effect to a highly time bound process for insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals. The objective is speedy resolution and maximizing recovery for lenders. The IBC, 2016 provides for a framework in which an Interim Resolution Professional shall carry on the business operations of the corporate as a going concern until the Committee of Creditors proposes a resolution plan that would keep the business of the corporate post insolvency resolution. On incidence of failure of the resolution plan, liquidation of the corporate person takes place. However, when liquidation of a corporate person takes place by sale of corporate debtor or its business as going concern; the person does not get dissolved and continues to exist in market as a going concern entity. The provision for this feature of liquidation was first inserted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018 w.e.f. 1-4-2018 under Regulation 32 which provided for ‘Manner of sale’. Further, the provision was amended by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2018, w.e.f 22-10-2018. The Second Amendment substituted the previous title of ‘Manner of Sale’ with ‘Sale of Assets, etc.’ the provisions which provides for liquidation as going concern are clause (e) and (f) of Regulation 32 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. ‘Going Concern’ is a concept of accounting and it’s relation with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy law will be examined in this study, with primary focus upon, the need for the concept of liquidation as going concern under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破产和破产法下的持续经营清算
《2016年破产与破产法》(以下简称《2016年IBC》)的颁布是为了对法人、合伙公司和个人的破产解决方案实施高度限时的程序。目标是迅速解决和最大限度地恢复贷款。2016年IBC规定了一个框架,在该框架中,临时解决专家应将公司的业务运营作为持续经营,直到债权人委员会提出一项解决计划,该计划将在破产解决后保持公司的业务。在决议方案失败的情况下,发生法人人清算。但是,当法人因出售公司债务人或其持续经营业务而进行清算时;该人不解散,并作为持续经营实体继续存在于市场。关于这一清算特征的规定最初是由印度破产和破产委员会(清算程序)(修订)条例,2018年1月4日生效,根据第32条规定了“出售方式”。此外,《2018年印度破产和破产委员会(清算程序)(第二次修订)条例》对该条款进行了修订,于2018年10月22日生效。第二修正案将之前的“出售方式”标题替换为“资产出售等”,规定作为持续经营进行清算的条款为2016年印度破产和破产委员会(清算程序)条例第32条第(e)和(f)条。“持续经营”是会计的一个概念,它与破产和破产法的关系将在本研究中进行研究,主要关注的是,清算的概念需要在破产和破产法下持续经营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bankruptcy's Equity Canon Insolvency Set Offs in India: A Comparative Perspective Betting on Farms: Feasible Chapter 12 Plans The Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Reference Case, 1934 Bespoke Bankruptcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1