Impact of alternative designs of multimedia elaboration on learning outcomes: Towards personalized learning of Software Engineering.

S. Chikasha, W. V. Petegem, M. Valcke
{"title":"Impact of alternative designs of multimedia elaboration on learning outcomes: Towards personalized learning of Software Engineering.","authors":"S. Chikasha, W. V. Petegem, M. Valcke","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study takes place in the context in which learning analytics is starting to gain more ground in seeking to understand some of the critical issues on how multimedia learning can support personalized learning design. This paper investigates the critical issues of individual learner differences regarding the impact of alternative designs of multimedia enhanced e-Learning communities. In this study, an online course in the domain of Software Engineering was used. The study involved Bachelor of Science students from an institution of higher education in Zimbabwe taking a course of Software Engineering. The study centers on the impact of student learning styles, cognitive styles, study approaches and prior knowledge on the efficacy, satisfaction, learning experience and outcomes related to software engineering learning in an eLearning community enhanced with alternative designs of multimedia elaborations. The study will go a long way in informing design issues to support personalized learning for Southern African learners in their context. The text based online eLearning community enriched with static graphics; animations, audio, and video were used. The results point to clear differential impact based on the cognitive styles on the effect of multimedia enhanced community. In field independent learners, the multimedia design based on text, animation and audio resulted in higher learning outcomes and satisfaction but decreased cognitive load. In field dependent learners, the learning outcomes and satisfaction levels seemed to be lower, however an increase in cognitive load was noticed. This effect was obvious with the addition of audio to the environment. Only prior knowledge and cognitive style were the significant predictors for learning outcome. This was only realized in the learning environment enhanced with text and static graphics.","PeriodicalId":416694,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study takes place in the context in which learning analytics is starting to gain more ground in seeking to understand some of the critical issues on how multimedia learning can support personalized learning design. This paper investigates the critical issues of individual learner differences regarding the impact of alternative designs of multimedia enhanced e-Learning communities. In this study, an online course in the domain of Software Engineering was used. The study involved Bachelor of Science students from an institution of higher education in Zimbabwe taking a course of Software Engineering. The study centers on the impact of student learning styles, cognitive styles, study approaches and prior knowledge on the efficacy, satisfaction, learning experience and outcomes related to software engineering learning in an eLearning community enhanced with alternative designs of multimedia elaborations. The study will go a long way in informing design issues to support personalized learning for Southern African learners in their context. The text based online eLearning community enriched with static graphics; animations, audio, and video were used. The results point to clear differential impact based on the cognitive styles on the effect of multimedia enhanced community. In field independent learners, the multimedia design based on text, animation and audio resulted in higher learning outcomes and satisfaction but decreased cognitive load. In field dependent learners, the learning outcomes and satisfaction levels seemed to be lower, however an increase in cognitive load was noticed. This effect was obvious with the addition of audio to the environment. Only prior knowledge and cognitive style were the significant predictors for learning outcome. This was only realized in the learning environment enhanced with text and static graphics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多媒体阐述的替代设计对学习结果的影响:面向软件工程的个性化学习。
本研究的背景是,学习分析在寻求理解多媒体学习如何支持个性化学习设计的一些关键问题方面开始取得更多进展。本文探讨了多媒体增强型电子学习社区的不同设计对个体学习者差异的影响。本研究采用软件工程领域的在线课程。这项研究涉及津巴布韦一所高等教育机构攻读软件工程课程的理学学士学位的学生。本研究主要探讨在电子学习社区中,学生的学习风格、认知风格、学习方法和先验知识对软件工程学习的效能、满意度、学习体验和结果的影响。这项研究将在很大程度上为设计问题提供信息,以支持南部非洲学习者在其环境下的个性化学习。基于文本、丰富静态图形的在线电子学习社区;使用了动画、音频和视频。结果表明,不同认知方式对多媒体增强社区效果的影响存在明显差异。在现场独立学习者中,基于文本、动画和音频的多媒体设计提高了学习效果和满意度,但降低了认知负荷。在领域依赖学习者中,学习成果和满意度水平似乎较低,但认知负荷有所增加。在环境中添加音频后,这种效果非常明显。只有先验知识和认知风格是学习结果的显著预测因子。这只能在增强了文本和静态图形的学习环境中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual Laboratory Workshop in Physics Hands-on Physics Experiments for K-6 Teachers at CERN Analysis of dual and non-dual student learning outcomes and student dropout data A Proposed Machine Learning Based Approach to Support Students with Learning Difficulties in The Post-Pandemic Norm Fab Lab-based learning: an environment to promote Women and Leadership in Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1