Improved PROMs and Less Post-op Pain at 6 months with ACR and MUA compared to MUA Alone in Patients with Resistant Frozen Shoulder

A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, U. Saeed, Z. Khan, M. Mahmood, Muhammad Ali, Asad Ramzan, Marryam Anwar
{"title":"Improved PROMs and Less Post-op Pain at 6 months with ACR and MUA compared to MUA Alone in Patients with Resistant Frozen Shoulder","authors":"A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, U. Saeed, Z. Khan, M. Mahmood, Muhammad Ali, Asad Ramzan, Marryam Anwar","doi":"10.48036/apims.v19i2.790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"effectiveness of arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) versus MUA alone in patients with resistant frozen shoulder, specifically focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and postoperative pain levels at 6 months.\nMethodology: This retrospectively analyzed study was conducted at Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, from June 2019 to August 1st, 2022. The data of 50 patients who underwent ACR with MUA (Group A) and MUA alone (Group B) were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were assessed preoperatively using the VAS pain scale, ASES, OSS, and range of motion (ROM). Preoperative results were compared to postoperative results taken 6 months postoperatively. The results were analyzed using SPSS. Independent t-tests and paired sample t-tests were used to assess significant differences between the two groups.\nResults: The mean age was 57 years with a mean duration of symptoms prior to surgery of 23 months. Both groups experienced a significant difference in the VAS pain scale, ASES, OSS, and ROM (p < 0.05). Patients treated with ACR and MUA (Group A) experienced significantly lower postoperative pain compared to patients treated with MUA alone (Group B) (16.68 vs. 23.72), as well as higher ASES (71.40 vs. 66.64) and OSS (37.68 vs. 34.04) scores, respectively (p < 0.05). The ROM was slightly higher in Group A; however, it was statistically insignificant.\nConclusion: ACR with MUA and MUA alone are effective treatments for adhesive capsulitis. ACR with MUA provides better pain relief and functional shoulder outcomes in the early postoperative period and at 6 months. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.","PeriodicalId":184398,"journal":{"name":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v19i2.790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

effectiveness of arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) versus MUA alone in patients with resistant frozen shoulder, specifically focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and postoperative pain levels at 6 months. Methodology: This retrospectively analyzed study was conducted at Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, from June 2019 to August 1st, 2022. The data of 50 patients who underwent ACR with MUA (Group A) and MUA alone (Group B) were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were assessed preoperatively using the VAS pain scale, ASES, OSS, and range of motion (ROM). Preoperative results were compared to postoperative results taken 6 months postoperatively. The results were analyzed using SPSS. Independent t-tests and paired sample t-tests were used to assess significant differences between the two groups. Results: The mean age was 57 years with a mean duration of symptoms prior to surgery of 23 months. Both groups experienced a significant difference in the VAS pain scale, ASES, OSS, and ROM (p < 0.05). Patients treated with ACR and MUA (Group A) experienced significantly lower postoperative pain compared to patients treated with MUA alone (Group B) (16.68 vs. 23.72), as well as higher ASES (71.40 vs. 66.64) and OSS (37.68 vs. 34.04) scores, respectively (p < 0.05). The ROM was slightly higher in Group A; however, it was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: ACR with MUA and MUA alone are effective treatments for adhesive capsulitis. ACR with MUA provides better pain relief and functional shoulder outcomes in the early postoperative period and at 6 months. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与单用MUA相比,抗阻性肩周炎患者在6个月时采用ACR和MUA可改善PROMs和减少术后疼痛
关节镜下关节囊释放(ACR)联合麻醉下操作(MUA)与单独MUA在难治性冻疮患者中的有效性,特别关注患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和术后6个月的疼痛水平。方法:本回顾性分析研究于2019年6月至2022年8月1日在费萨拉巴德联合医院进行。回顾性分析50例合并MUA (A组)和单独MUA (B组)行ACR的患者资料。术前采用VAS疼痛量表、ase、OSS和活动度(ROM)对患者进行评估。术前结果与术后6个月的结果进行比较。采用SPSS统计软件对结果进行分析。采用独立t检验和配对样本t检验评估两组间的显著性差异。结果:患者平均年龄57岁,术前症状平均持续时间23个月。两组在VAS疼痛评分、ase、OSS、ROM评分上差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。联合ACR和MUA治疗的患者(A组)术后疼痛明显低于单独MUA治疗的患者(B组)(16.68比23.72),且asa(71.40比66.64)和OSS(37.68比34.04)评分较高(p < 0.05)。A组ROM略高;然而,这在统计上是不显著的。结论:ACR联合MUA及单用MUA治疗粘连性囊炎疗效显著。ACR联合MUA在术后早期和术后6个月提供了更好的疼痛缓解和肩关节功能。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hepatoprotective Potential of Micronutrients Against Methotrexate-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Experimental Mice Model Impact of 3D virtual reality on teaching and learning human anatomy among undergraduate students Comparison of Effects of Preserved and Preservative Free Anti-Glaucoma Drugs in Causing Dry Eyes Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and its Correlation with Liver Function Test Comparison of Hemodynamic Effect of Propofol and Ketofol during Induction of Anaesthesia in General Surgery Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1