{"title":"Written Corrective Feedback in Online Writing Classrooms: EFL Students’ Perceptions and Preferences","authors":"","doi":"10.37745/ijelt.13/vol10no1pp.12-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the existing body of research on written corrective feedback (WCF) in foreign language (L2) writing classrooms by focusing on online learning environments. The study offers insight into the effective use of different WCF strategies in a Saudi context. This was achieved by investigating students’ perceptions of WCF and exploring the WCF strategies that students preferred in online writing classrooms. Data was collected through an online survey modified and administered for this study. SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the students’ responses. Results for the first research question indicate that Saudi students felt positive about using WCF in their EFL online writing classrooms as they found it a helpful tool to improve their writing. For the second research question, findings suggest that students found some WCF strategies to be more helpful than others. Electronic feedback was the strategy that students most preferred, while unfocused feedback was the second most favorable strategy. The study has pedagogical implications for EFL teachers regarding the integration of different WCF strategies to improve EFL online writing classrooms.","PeriodicalId":231165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol10no1pp.12-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article contributes to the existing body of research on written corrective feedback (WCF) in foreign language (L2) writing classrooms by focusing on online learning environments. The study offers insight into the effective use of different WCF strategies in a Saudi context. This was achieved by investigating students’ perceptions of WCF and exploring the WCF strategies that students preferred in online writing classrooms. Data was collected through an online survey modified and administered for this study. SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the students’ responses. Results for the first research question indicate that Saudi students felt positive about using WCF in their EFL online writing classrooms as they found it a helpful tool to improve their writing. For the second research question, findings suggest that students found some WCF strategies to be more helpful than others. Electronic feedback was the strategy that students most preferred, while unfocused feedback was the second most favorable strategy. The study has pedagogical implications for EFL teachers regarding the integration of different WCF strategies to improve EFL online writing classrooms.
本文通过关注在线学习环境,对现有的关于外语写作课堂中书面纠正反馈(WCF)的研究做出了贡献。该研究为在沙特背景下有效使用不同的WCF策略提供了见解。这是通过调查学生对WCF的看法和探索学生在在线写作课堂上喜欢的WCF策略来实现的。数据收集通过在线调查修改和管理为本研究。采用SPSS version 26对数据进行分析。使用描述性统计来描述学生的反应。第一个研究问题的结果表明,沙特学生对在他们的英语在线写作课堂上使用WCF持积极态度,因为他们发现这是一种有助于提高写作水平的工具。对于第二个研究问题,研究结果表明,学生发现一些WCF策略比其他策略更有帮助。电子反馈是学生们最喜欢的策略,而非集中反馈是第二受欢迎的策略。本研究对英语教师整合不同的WCF策略以改善英语在线写作课堂具有教学意义。