Interpretation Qualification Proof toward Humiliation Performer or Libel in Social Media

Bayu Fermadi, Lasemi Sina, La Syarifudin
{"title":"Interpretation Qualification Proof toward Humiliation Performer or Libel in Social Media","authors":"Bayu Fermadi, Lasemi Sina, La Syarifudin","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v3i1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information openess is needed by society, the improvement of information technology sector, electronic media and globalization happens almost in all life sectors. Technology improvement which is marked with internet can be operated by using electronic media such as computer or handphone. Through internet, information exchange can be done fast, accurate and with cheap cost. Therefore internet can be media to ease someone to do type of criminal act which based on informaton technology (cybercrime) such as, criminal ac like libel, pornography, gamling, account breaking, and etcetera. \nRelated with libel via electronic media, as it is organized in Law Number 11 Year 2011 about Electronic Information and Transactions. Then this issue which is done and is also not missed from electronic media itself. The proof is issue which hold important role in investigation process in law. The provision about the criminal act method can be done toward person who is accused doing certain criminal act. This provision is organized in formal criminal law. Verification process becomes important because it will decides defendant fate. If proof result with proof of evidence which is determined with law does not enough proof the guilt which is accused to defendant, then defendant is freed from punishment. It is vice versa, if the defendant guilt can be proved with enough proof of evidence, then the defendant can be avowed guilty and will be punished according to valid law.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mulawarman Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v3i1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information openess is needed by society, the improvement of information technology sector, electronic media and globalization happens almost in all life sectors. Technology improvement which is marked with internet can be operated by using electronic media such as computer or handphone. Through internet, information exchange can be done fast, accurate and with cheap cost. Therefore internet can be media to ease someone to do type of criminal act which based on informaton technology (cybercrime) such as, criminal ac like libel, pornography, gamling, account breaking, and etcetera. Related with libel via electronic media, as it is organized in Law Number 11 Year 2011 about Electronic Information and Transactions. Then this issue which is done and is also not missed from electronic media itself. The proof is issue which hold important role in investigation process in law. The provision about the criminal act method can be done toward person who is accused doing certain criminal act. This provision is organized in formal criminal law. Verification process becomes important because it will decides defendant fate. If proof result with proof of evidence which is determined with law does not enough proof the guilt which is accused to defendant, then defendant is freed from punishment. It is vice versa, if the defendant guilt can be proved with enough proof of evidence, then the defendant can be avowed guilty and will be punished according to valid law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体中侮辱行为者或诽谤行为的解释资格证明
信息开放是社会的需要,信息技术部门、电子媒体和全球化的进步几乎发生在生活的各个部门。以互联网为标志的技术改进可以通过使用电子媒体,如电脑或手机来操作。通过互联网,可以快速、准确、低成本地进行信息交换。因此,互联网可以成为媒体,以减轻某人做基于信息技术(网络犯罪)的犯罪行为,如犯罪行为,如诽谤,色情,赌博,账户破坏等。与通过电子媒体的诽谤有关,因为它是在2011年关于电子信息和交易的第11号法律中组织的。这个问题已经解决了,电子媒体本身也没有遗漏。证据问题是法律上侦查过程中起着重要作用的问题。关于犯罪行为方法的规定可以适用于被控实施某种犯罪行为的人。这一规定在正式刑法中有组织。验证过程非常重要,因为它将决定被告的命运。如果以法律认定的证据证明结果不足以证明被告被指控的罪行,那么被告可以免于处罚。反之亦然,如果有足够的证据证明被告有罪,那么被告就可以被宣告有罪,并根据有效的法律受到惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are there International Labour Standards? Case of Migrant Workers’ Exploitation in Italy Implication of Coal Mining Permit Governance to Environmental Degradation in East Kalimantan Degradation of Authority and Institution of The Honorary Council Election Public Participation in Constitutional Amendments with Deliberation Requirements in the Unamendability Framework: A Comparative Study UNCLOS Definition of Piracy: Is it still Relevant for Modern Piracy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1