Pub Date : 2022-12-30DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.905
Yordan Gunawan, M. Ansar, M. Fathi, Stephanie Devty, Dwilani Irrynta
The increasingly fierce competition in the world of work has an impact on people getting jobs. The condition makes most people become migrants by traveling to other countries to find a job for a decent life in the future. However, the work that migrant workers get is often not as expected, so the rights of migrants are often not fulfilled. The amount of violence in the world of work and the non-fulfillment of the rights of migrant workers in Italy is an act that violates human rights. Therefore, the authors wrote this article by using normative legal research method to analyze migrant workers in Italy who are exploited by forced labor and the lack of protection regarding the minimum wage for migrant workers and also aims to analyze the role of the International Labour Organization as an organization that protects the rights of migrant workers, including protection from violence and protection of the minimum wage for migrant workers in Italy. The result shows that there is an urgency for Italy to ratify the Minimum Wage Convention on the grounds that it diminishes the exploitation of migrant workers and provides binding legal force for the sake of migrant workers.
{"title":"Are there International Labour Standards? Case of Migrant Workers’ Exploitation in Italy","authors":"Yordan Gunawan, M. Ansar, M. Fathi, Stephanie Devty, Dwilani Irrynta","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.905","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.905","url":null,"abstract":"The increasingly fierce competition in the world of work has an impact on people getting jobs. The condition makes most people become migrants by traveling to other countries to find a job for a decent life in the future. However, the work that migrant workers get is often not as expected, so the rights of migrants are often not fulfilled. The amount of violence in the world of work and the non-fulfillment of the rights of migrant workers in Italy is an act that violates human rights. Therefore, the authors wrote this article by using normative legal research method to analyze migrant workers in Italy who are exploited by forced labor and the lack of protection regarding the minimum wage for migrant workers and also aims to analyze the role of the International Labour Organization as an organization that protects the rights of migrant workers, including protection from violence and protection of the minimum wage for migrant workers in Italy. The result shows that there is an urgency for Italy to ratify the Minimum Wage Convention on the grounds that it diminishes the exploitation of migrant workers and provides binding legal force for the sake of migrant workers.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114773506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-29DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.922
Mohamad Nasir
This article analyzes the regulation dynamics regarding coal mining permit governance and its impact on environmental degradation. This paper addresses two main issues. First, it explores the dynamics of coal mining regulations and to what extent they create legal uncertainty in coal mining permit governance. Second, it investigates the implications of the legal uncertainty to the environmental damage around the mining sites. The findings demonstrate that two factors have driven policies and laws in the coal mining sector for over a decade. First, coal mining legislation relates to other industries such as the environment, forestry, spatial planning, and regional governance. Besides, the regulations are multi-level, where the authority lies with the central, provincial, and district/city governments. The second is legislative capture, where licensing legal norms are "co-opted" by particular economic interests. Such policies and laws dynamics lead to uncertainty in the permit governance of the coal mining sector. Further, the legal uncertainty that makes a permit has failed to control coal mining activities and protect citizens' access to a good and healthy environment. On the contrary, permit demonstrated the opposite role: becoming a legal instrument that drives environmental damage and pollution.
{"title":"Implication of Coal Mining Permit Governance to Environmental Degradation in East Kalimantan","authors":"Mohamad Nasir","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.922","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the regulation dynamics regarding coal mining permit governance and its impact on environmental degradation. This paper addresses two main issues. First, it explores the dynamics of coal mining regulations and to what extent they create legal uncertainty in coal mining permit governance. Second, it investigates the implications of the legal uncertainty to the environmental damage around the mining sites. The findings demonstrate that two factors have driven policies and laws in the coal mining sector for over a decade. First, coal mining legislation relates to other industries such as the environment, forestry, spatial planning, and regional governance. Besides, the regulations are multi-level, where the authority lies with the central, provincial, and district/city governments. The second is legislative capture, where licensing legal norms are \"co-opted\" by particular economic interests. Such policies and laws dynamics lead to uncertainty in the permit governance of the coal mining sector. Further, the legal uncertainty that makes a permit has failed to control coal mining activities and protect citizens' access to a good and healthy environment. On the contrary, permit demonstrated the opposite role: becoming a legal instrument that drives environmental damage and pollution.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125605240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-27DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.912
Jamila Jamil, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
This article discusses the position of the DKPP after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021 and the power of its decision. As is known, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021, the DKPP Decision, which was originally final and binding, became unconstitutional if it was not interpreted as only binding on the President, KPU, Provincial KPU, Regency/City KPU and Bawaslu. The research method used is a legal research method using statutory approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach to be able to find new formulation of DKPP structuring design after Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021. The results of this study found that the weakening of the authority of the DKPP through the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 32 / PUU-XIX / 2021, should also be followed by the weakening of the DKPP institution, because after the final and binding character is weakened by the Constitutional Court, the DKPP no longer has the urgency to be used as a permanent institution. The Constitutional Court should affirm the institutional status of the DKPP as part of the institution exercising judicial power, so that the DKPP has a more definite status and its decisions remain final and binding.
{"title":"Degradation of Authority and Institution of The Honorary Council Election","authors":"Jamila Jamil, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.912","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the position of the DKPP after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021 and the power of its decision. As is known, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021, the DKPP Decision, which was originally final and binding, became unconstitutional if it was not interpreted as only binding on the President, KPU, Provincial KPU, Regency/City KPU and Bawaslu. The research method used is a legal research method using statutory approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach to be able to find new formulation of DKPP structuring design after Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021. The results of this study found that the weakening of the authority of the DKPP through the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 32 / PUU-XIX / 2021, should also be followed by the weakening of the DKPP institution, because after the final and binding character is weakened by the Constitutional Court, the DKPP no longer has the urgency to be used as a permanent institution. The Constitutional Court should affirm the institutional status of the DKPP as part of the institution exercising judicial power, so that the DKPP has a more definite status and its decisions remain final and binding.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129123688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
From time to time, it is considered that Constitutional Amendments are lack of public participation and contains political aspects. Therefore, many nations regulate certain provisions to ensure that the Constitutional Amendments are merely for public order and welfare. One of the provision is the temporal unamendability. In the shape of deliberation requirements, which is essentially the involvement of the public in submitting constitutional amendments within a certain time limit. Indonesian Law doesn’t recognize the concept of deliberation requirements, therefore, the authors will analyze Sweden and South Korean Law, two countries that are also using civil law system and have regulated deliberation requirements in submitting constitutional amendments. This paper will discuss two problems: 1) the legal provisions for constitutional amendments in Indonesia, Sweden, and South Korea, and 2) the guarantee model for public participation in constitutional amendments using the deliberation requirements model. This paper uses legal research method, with a conceptual, statutory, and comparative approach. The results show that Sweden and South Korean Law have involved both the public and the Representative Body to determine wether constitutional amendment will be performed, meanwhile Indonesia hasn’t involve the public to vote for a constitutional amendments. Therefore, to guarantee public participation in constitutional amendments, the authors provide a model which include the public participation through vote or referendum to decide a constitutional amendments and a period of time to file for constitutional amendment.
{"title":"Public Participation in Constitutional Amendments with Deliberation Requirements in the Unamendability Framework: A Comparative Study","authors":"Xavier Nugraha, Stefania Arshanty Felicia, Julienna Hartono","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.904","url":null,"abstract":"From time to time, it is considered that Constitutional Amendments are lack of public participation and contains political aspects. Therefore, many nations regulate certain provisions to ensure that the Constitutional Amendments are merely for public order and welfare. One of the provision is the temporal unamendability. In the shape of deliberation requirements, which is essentially the involvement of the public in submitting constitutional amendments within a certain time limit. Indonesian Law doesn’t recognize the concept of deliberation requirements, therefore, the authors will analyze Sweden and South Korean Law, two countries that are also using civil law system and have regulated deliberation requirements in submitting constitutional amendments. This paper will discuss two problems: 1) the legal provisions for constitutional amendments in Indonesia, Sweden, and South Korea, and 2) the guarantee model for public participation in constitutional amendments using the deliberation requirements model. This paper uses legal research method, with a conceptual, statutory, and comparative approach. The results show that Sweden and South Korean Law have involved both the public and the Representative Body to determine wether constitutional amendment will be performed, meanwhile Indonesia hasn’t involve the public to vote for a constitutional amendments. Therefore, to guarantee public participation in constitutional amendments, the authors provide a model which include the public participation through vote or referendum to decide a constitutional amendments and a period of time to file for constitutional amendment.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132383980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-20DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.943
N. Nilasari, Lorna Steele
Nowadays, piracy as one of crimes at sea has formed in different ways compared to the historical counterparts. On the past, the act of piracy consisted of first approaching the ship, then fighting it, and finally seizing it before escaping in another vessel. Meanwhile, in recent times, more sophisticated kinds of piracy are launching their assaults with the help of cutting-edge technology. However, due to UNCLOS's restricted definition of piracy, it is challenging to combat such modern forms. According to experts, one of the greatest barriers to tackling piracy is its restricted and vague definition. This research aims to analyse the applicability of the UNCLOS definition of maritime piracy considering its new developments. This research method consists of doctrinal and library-based research. The previous and recent cases are contrasted to investigate definitional issues. The study revealed that UNCLOS's ambiguous and unclear definition of piracy has caused problems. Regarding contemporary piracy, the UCLOS approach is insufficient to combat well-organized pirate attacks in the modern world.
{"title":"UNCLOS Definition of Piracy: Is it still Relevant for Modern Piracy?","authors":"N. Nilasari, Lorna Steele","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.943","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.943","url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, piracy as one of crimes at sea has formed in different ways compared to the historical counterparts. On the past, the act of piracy consisted of first approaching the ship, then fighting it, and finally seizing it before escaping in another vessel. Meanwhile, in recent times, more sophisticated kinds of piracy are launching their assaults with the help of cutting-edge technology. However, due to UNCLOS's restricted definition of piracy, it is challenging to combat such modern forms. According to experts, one of the greatest barriers to tackling piracy is its restricted and vague definition. This research aims to analyse the applicability of the UNCLOS definition of maritime piracy considering its new developments. This research method consists of doctrinal and library-based research. The previous and recent cases are contrasted to investigate definitional issues. The study revealed that UNCLOS's ambiguous and unclear definition of piracy has caused problems. Regarding contemporary piracy, the UCLOS approach is insufficient to combat well-organized pirate attacks in the modern world.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115478032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-30DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.834
Nurfaika Ishak
Pengawasan adalah tindakan yang dilakukan dalam suatu hal yang bertujuan agar apa yang menjadi objek pengawasan tersebut berjalan sesuatu dengan seharusnya sehingga tidak terjadi “detournement de pouvoir”. Pelayanan publik merupakan suatu aktivitas atau interaksi antara masyarakat dan pemerintah atau birokrasi. Pelayanan publik yang baik akan membentuk pemerintahan yang baik “good governance”. Pelayanan publik sangat dibutuhkan oleh masyarakat di segala bidang kehidupan. Oleh karena itu, eksisnya sebuah lembaga independen yang berwenang untuk mengawasi jalannya penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik menjadi penting. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008, lembaga negara yang berwenang untuk mengawasi penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik adalah Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. Kajian menarik adalah bagaimana kemudian efektivitas pengawasan pelayanan publik yang dilakukan oleh Ombudsman RI. Pendekatan penelitian hukum normative, pengumpulan data dengan sumber hukum primer dan pengumpulan data sekunder dari literatur yang berhubungan dengan topik pembahasan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa tidak seluruh laporan yang masuk ke meja Ombudsman RI dapat diselesaikan. Ombudsman masih memiliki keterbatasan, salah satunya adalah apabila laporan masyatakat tersebut tidak dapat dilanjutkan jika hasil pemeriksaan substantif menunjukkan bahwa ombudsman tidak berwenang melanjutkan pemeriksaan. Namun, dapat dilihat bahwa masyarakat mulai memberikan kepercayaan kepada Ombudsman RI dengan terjadinya peningkatan konsultasi non laporan yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat periode 2017-2021.
监督是指在某一领域采取的行动，以使监督对象的工作正常进行，这样就不会发生“detournement de pouvoir”。公共服务是社会和政府或官僚之间的一种活动或互动。良好的公共服务将建立一个良好的政府“良好的治理”。公共服务在各行各业的社区是必不可少的。因此，一个独立授权的机构在监督公共服务的进程方面的极端做法变得至关重要。根据2008年第37条法律，负责监督公共服务的国务院是印度尼西亚共和国的行政长官。有趣的研究是助理检察官RI提供的公共服务监督的有效性。规范法律研究方法，用主要法律来源收集数据，并从与讨论主题相关的文献收集次要数据。结果表明，进入RI Ombudsman RI办公桌的所有报告都无法完成。行政长官仍有其局限性，其中之一是，如果制毒官员不被授权继续审查，masyatakat的报告就不能继续。然而，可以看到的是，公众开始相信经营者日，在2018 -2021年期间，非咨询报告出现了增加。
{"title":"Efektivitas Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia","authors":"Nurfaika Ishak","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.834","url":null,"abstract":"Pengawasan adalah tindakan yang dilakukan dalam suatu hal yang bertujuan agar apa yang menjadi objek pengawasan tersebut berjalan sesuatu dengan seharusnya sehingga tidak terjadi “detournement de pouvoir”. Pelayanan publik merupakan suatu aktivitas atau interaksi antara masyarakat dan pemerintah atau birokrasi. Pelayanan publik yang baik akan membentuk pemerintahan yang baik “good governance”. Pelayanan publik sangat dibutuhkan oleh masyarakat di segala bidang kehidupan. Oleh karena itu, eksisnya sebuah lembaga independen yang berwenang untuk mengawasi jalannya penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik menjadi penting. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008, lembaga negara yang berwenang untuk mengawasi penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik adalah Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. Kajian menarik adalah bagaimana kemudian efektivitas pengawasan pelayanan publik yang dilakukan oleh Ombudsman RI. Pendekatan penelitian hukum normative, pengumpulan data dengan sumber hukum primer dan pengumpulan data sekunder dari literatur yang berhubungan dengan topik pembahasan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa tidak seluruh laporan yang masuk ke meja Ombudsman RI dapat diselesaikan. Ombudsman masih memiliki keterbatasan, salah satunya adalah apabila laporan masyatakat tersebut tidak dapat dilanjutkan jika hasil pemeriksaan substantif menunjukkan bahwa ombudsman tidak berwenang melanjutkan pemeriksaan. Namun, dapat dilihat bahwa masyarakat mulai memberikan kepercayaan kepada Ombudsman RI dengan terjadinya peningkatan konsultasi non laporan yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat periode 2017-2021.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126347730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-30DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.780
Diya Ul Akmal, Dea Linta Arlianti
Dinamika ketatanegaraan yang terjadi saat ini menempatkan Hak Konstitusional harus terlanggar terlebih dahulu ketika disahkannya suatu Rancangan Undang-Undang. Hal ini mengakibatkan banyaknya terjadi demonstrasi yang dilakukan oleh berbagai elemen masyarakat. Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga peradilan tidak dapat melakukan apa-apa dalam proses legislasi karena bukan kewenangannya. Meskipun begitu, Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai the Guardian of Constitution memiliki kewajiban untuk melindungi Hak Konstitusional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan socio legal yang diperkuat dengan analisis data normatif. Data yang didapatkan dianalisis menggunakan metode analisis data kualitatif yaitu mendeskripsikan menggunakan kata-kata dengan logika ilmiah. Banyaknya jumlah pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi penegasan besarnya harapan masyarakat. Perkembangan ketatanegaraan yang terjadi mengakibatkan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dirasa terbatas dalam melakukan pengujian Konstitusional. Hal ini dikarenakan penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia dalam melakukan pengujian Konstitusional hanya sebatas pengujian Undang-Undang. Sejatinya penafsiran pengujian Konstitusional juga mencakup kewenangan pengujian Rancangan Undang-Undang dan Constitutional Question yang saat ini belum menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Oleh karena itu, penambahan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi urgensi untuk dapat melindungi Hak Konstitusional warga negara secara maksimal.
{"title":"Dinamika Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Dalam Implementasi Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi","authors":"Diya Ul Akmal, Dea Linta Arlianti","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.780","url":null,"abstract":"Dinamika ketatanegaraan yang terjadi saat ini menempatkan Hak Konstitusional harus terlanggar terlebih dahulu ketika disahkannya suatu Rancangan Undang-Undang. Hal ini mengakibatkan banyaknya terjadi demonstrasi yang dilakukan oleh berbagai elemen masyarakat. Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga peradilan tidak dapat melakukan apa-apa dalam proses legislasi karena bukan kewenangannya. Meskipun begitu, Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai the Guardian of Constitution memiliki kewajiban untuk melindungi Hak Konstitusional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan socio legal yang diperkuat dengan analisis data normatif. Data yang didapatkan dianalisis menggunakan metode analisis data kualitatif yaitu mendeskripsikan menggunakan kata-kata dengan logika ilmiah. Banyaknya jumlah pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi penegasan besarnya harapan masyarakat. Perkembangan ketatanegaraan yang terjadi mengakibatkan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dirasa terbatas dalam melakukan pengujian Konstitusional. Hal ini dikarenakan penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia dalam melakukan pengujian Konstitusional hanya sebatas pengujian Undang-Undang. Sejatinya penafsiran pengujian Konstitusional juga mencakup kewenangan pengujian Rancangan Undang-Undang dan Constitutional Question yang saat ini belum menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Oleh karena itu, penambahan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi urgensi untuk dapat melindungi Hak Konstitusional warga negara secara maksimal.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123768199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-29DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.757
Handoko Limaho, R. Pramono, Rio Christiawan
Palm oil plantation businesses have always been the subject of heavy scrutiny and are accused of causing the most environmental and social mishaps in Indonesia. Such condemnation comes from within the country and outside as well. Even though the palm oil industry is one of Indonesia’s biggest GDP contributors, the opposition in the past decade outweighs the support, and many attempts at reasoning fall on deaf ears. This article will argue that the need for transformation of the industry in order to support the nations’ sustainability development goals is an effort that involves all constituents. The relationship that is built upon the palm oil companies and its stakeholders must be met with certain legalities and support from the government in order to foster a green growth relationship that will sustain the economy and the environment, which will ultimately support Indonesia’s sustainable development goals.
{"title":"Collaboration between Government and Palm Oil Industry to Achieve Sustainability Development Goals in Indonesia","authors":"Handoko Limaho, R. Pramono, Rio Christiawan","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.757","url":null,"abstract":"Palm oil plantation businesses have always been the subject of heavy scrutiny and are accused of causing the most environmental and social mishaps in Indonesia. Such condemnation comes from within the country and outside as well. Even though the palm oil industry is one of Indonesia’s biggest GDP contributors, the opposition in the past decade outweighs the support, and many attempts at reasoning fall on deaf ears. This article will argue that the need for transformation of the industry in order to support the nations’ sustainability development goals is an effort that involves all constituents. The relationship that is built upon the palm oil companies and its stakeholders must be met with certain legalities and support from the government in order to foster a green growth relationship that will sustain the economy and the environment, which will ultimately support Indonesia’s sustainable development goals.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128613338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-29DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.772
Aviany Yanti, Winda Fitri
Pengaturan sanksi pencemaran lingkungan hidup di Indonesia mengalami perubahan setelah disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja (“UU Cipta Kerja”). Terdapat beberapa perubahan dan penghapusan pasal-pasal krusial seperti perubahan izin lingkungan menjadi persetujuan lingkungan, penambahan sanksi baru berupa denda administratif, penghapusan sanksi pidana terkait pembuangan limbah B3 tanpa izin, pergeseran yang menyebabkan multitafsir makna terkait konsep strict liability, dan penyusunan Amdal tanpa sertifikat kompetensi yang dulunya diatur sebagai sanksi pidana kini menjadi denda administratif. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa UU Cipta Kerja berstatus inkonstitusional bersyarat menimbulkan implikasi bagi pemberlakuan UU Cipta Kerja di masa depan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode doktrinal, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perubahan-perubahan ketentuan sanki lingkungan pasca diberlakukannya UU Cipta Kerja dan mengetahui perbandingan ketentuan sanki lingkungan di negara Jepang. Utamanya untuk melakukan kajian terkait perbandingan hukum pengaturan di bidang lingkungan pada negara Jepang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan hukum lingkungan hidup di Jepang, dimana pengaturan penerapan sanksi pidana, pengawasan, perizinan dan penerapan mekanisme pembuktian dengan konsep strict liability lebih ketat, selain itu adanya kesadaran dan budaya hukum masyarakat yang tinggi akan pentingnya lingkungan hidup itu sendiri yang dapat menjadi contoh dan pembelajaran bagi Indonesia.
{"title":"Sanksi Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Studi Komparatif Negara Jepang","authors":"Aviany Yanti, Winda Fitri","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.772","url":null,"abstract":"Pengaturan sanksi pencemaran lingkungan hidup di Indonesia mengalami perubahan setelah disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja (“UU Cipta Kerja”). Terdapat beberapa perubahan dan penghapusan pasal-pasal krusial seperti perubahan izin lingkungan menjadi persetujuan lingkungan, penambahan sanksi baru berupa denda administratif, penghapusan sanksi pidana terkait pembuangan limbah B3 tanpa izin, pergeseran yang menyebabkan multitafsir makna terkait konsep strict liability, dan penyusunan Amdal tanpa sertifikat kompetensi yang dulunya diatur sebagai sanksi pidana kini menjadi denda administratif. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa UU Cipta Kerja berstatus inkonstitusional bersyarat menimbulkan implikasi bagi pemberlakuan UU Cipta Kerja di masa depan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode doktrinal, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perubahan-perubahan ketentuan sanki lingkungan pasca diberlakukannya UU Cipta Kerja dan mengetahui perbandingan ketentuan sanki lingkungan di negara Jepang. Utamanya untuk melakukan kajian terkait perbandingan hukum pengaturan di bidang lingkungan pada negara Jepang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan hukum lingkungan hidup di Jepang, dimana pengaturan penerapan sanksi pidana, pengawasan, perizinan dan penerapan mekanisme pembuktian dengan konsep strict liability lebih ketat, selain itu adanya kesadaran dan budaya hukum masyarakat yang tinggi akan pentingnya lingkungan hidup itu sendiri yang dapat menjadi contoh dan pembelajaran bagi Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129185172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-29DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.790
Ubait Kurniawan Aziz, Nur Azizah Hidayat
Telecommunication network is a necessity needed today and ever after. This momentum is exploited by several cheaters who looking for big profits. The one of bad trick is misuse someone else's ID card to register cellphone SIM Card so it can be sells faster. And that’s actually against not only Law no. 24 of 2013 concerning Population Administration but also Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The regulations about criminal liability misuse ID cards other person for registration cellphone SIM card not get serious attention from government. Therefore, the purposes of this research are : (1) using someone else's Personal Identity Number and Family Identity Number for cellphone SIM Cards registration illegally is an act of crime; (2) criminal liability of misuse other people's Personal Identity Number and Family Identity Number for registration cellphone SIM Cards based on the ITE Law and the Population Administration Law. This research using normative legal research, while methods using Statute Approach and Conceptual Approach. The results of this research found criminal liability sanctions for misuse someone else’s Personal Identity Number and Family Identity Number for registration cellphone SIM Cards illegally based on the ITE Law, the Criminal Code Law, and the Population Administration Law.
{"title":"Criminal Liability Of Misuse Personal Identity Number For Cellphone Cards Registration Illegally","authors":"Ubait Kurniawan Aziz, Nur Azizah Hidayat","doi":"10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.790","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v7i1.790","url":null,"abstract":"Telecommunication network is a necessity needed today and ever after. This momentum is exploited by several cheaters who looking for big profits. The one of bad trick is misuse someone else's ID card to register cellphone SIM Card so it can be sells faster. And that’s actually against not only Law no. 24 of 2013 concerning Population Administration but also Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law no. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The regulations about criminal liability misuse ID cards other person for registration cellphone SIM card not get serious attention from government. Therefore, the purposes of this research are : (1) using someone else's Personal Identity Number and Family Identity Number for cellphone SIM Cards registration illegally is an act of crime; (2) criminal liability of misuse other people's Personal Identity Number and Family Identity Number for registration cellphone SIM Cards based on the ITE Law and the Population Administration Law. This research using normative legal research, while methods using Statute Approach and Conceptual Approach. The results of this research found criminal liability sanctions for misuse someone else’s Personal Identity Number and Family Identity Number for registration cellphone SIM Cards illegally based on the ITE Law, the Criminal Code Law, and the Population Administration Law.","PeriodicalId":338711,"journal":{"name":"Mulawarman Law Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127060939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：