Foundationalism and the Promise Theory

P. Saprai
{"title":"Foundationalism and the Promise Theory","authors":"P. Saprai","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198779018.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter defines the book’s main target: the ‘promise theory’ of contract law. It claims that the promise theory is a ‘foundationalist’ theory of contract law, according to which the promise principle plays a special normative role in justifying contract law rules and doctrines. What exactly this special role is has been left obscure in the literature. This chapter offers three plausible interpretations. First, there is ‘justificatory necessity’ or the idea that promise plays an essential or necessary role in the justification of each and every contract law rule or doctrine. Second, there is ‘justificatory primacy’, according to which the promise principle overrides or defeats all other principles in cases of conflict. And, finally, there is ‘justificatory presumptiveness’, according to which there is an epistemic presumption that when contract law diverges from promise it is prima facie unjustified.","PeriodicalId":423198,"journal":{"name":"Contract Law Without Foundations","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contract Law Without Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198779018.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter defines the book’s main target: the ‘promise theory’ of contract law. It claims that the promise theory is a ‘foundationalist’ theory of contract law, according to which the promise principle plays a special normative role in justifying contract law rules and doctrines. What exactly this special role is has been left obscure in the literature. This chapter offers three plausible interpretations. First, there is ‘justificatory necessity’ or the idea that promise plays an essential or necessary role in the justification of each and every contract law rule or doctrine. Second, there is ‘justificatory primacy’, according to which the promise principle overrides or defeats all other principles in cases of conflict. And, finally, there is ‘justificatory presumptiveness’, according to which there is an epistemic presumption that when contract law diverges from promise it is prima facie unjustified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础主义与承诺理论
本章定义了本书的主要目标:合同法的“承诺理论”。承诺理论是合同法的“基础主义”理论,根据该理论,承诺原则在证明合同法规则和理论的正当性方面起着特殊的规范性作用。这个特殊的角色究竟是什么,在文献中一直是模糊的。本章提供了三种似是而非的解释。首先,有“正当性必要性”,或者认为承诺在每一个合同法规则或学说的正当性中起着重要或必要的作用。第二,有“正义至上”,根据这一原则,在冲突的情况下,承诺原则压倒或击败所有其他原则。最后,还有“正当性推定”,根据这种推定,有一种认识论推定,即当合同法偏离承诺时,它是初步不正当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contract Law Beyond the State Foundationalism and the Promise Theory Restraint of Trade and Freedom Intent to Contract and Trust Undue Influence and Exploitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1