A research on the characteristics and influencing factors of undergraduates' career decision-making difficulties — Based on Zhejiang Sci-Tech University

Liang Xin-ru, Zhu Qiu-li, Zheng La-jie, Hong Xiao-ying
{"title":"A research on the characteristics and influencing factors of undergraduates' career decision-making difficulties — Based on Zhejiang Sci-Tech University","authors":"Liang Xin-ru, Zhu Qiu-li, Zheng La-jie, Hong Xiao-ying","doi":"10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study introduces the characteristics and influencing factors of undergraduates' career decision-making difficulties. The participants are 233 undergraduates from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University. The questionnaire used was the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ; Gati & Saka, 2001). SPSS was used to conduct and analyze the study. There are several results are revealed as follows: (1) The structure of career decision-making difficulties is in line with results tested in foreign countries, but indecision factor jumps into the lack of information dimensions. (2)The girls' score was significantly higher than the boys' in “general indecisiveness”. (3) Significant grade differences between groups in “the lack of information about the self”. (4) Significant difference between different professional groups in “general indecisiveness”. (5) Whether is consistent or not, they all have interested professional and can focus on the relevant information. Persons without interests, will be disturbed by much more redundant information, can't focus on the relevant information. (6) To exchange information by the fixed social groups, it can increase the college students' understanding level on self and profession and reduce the puzzle of the career decision-making. (7) Students whose significance of employment is “to gain respect from others”, their scores of four factors are far lower than those whose significance of employment is “to reduce the burden of home”. (8) The students who “to gain respect from others” have a longer term in their planning, their goal of professional development is higher, and those who “to reduce the burden of home”, their employment is more blind, think more of the present difficulties. (9) The person who has the finest virtue, doesn't think that he has “virtue”, so is a virtue.","PeriodicalId":329450,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces the characteristics and influencing factors of undergraduates' career decision-making difficulties. The participants are 233 undergraduates from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University. The questionnaire used was the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ; Gati & Saka, 2001). SPSS was used to conduct and analyze the study. There are several results are revealed as follows: (1) The structure of career decision-making difficulties is in line with results tested in foreign countries, but indecision factor jumps into the lack of information dimensions. (2)The girls' score was significantly higher than the boys' in “general indecisiveness”. (3) Significant grade differences between groups in “the lack of information about the self”. (4) Significant difference between different professional groups in “general indecisiveness”. (5) Whether is consistent or not, they all have interested professional and can focus on the relevant information. Persons without interests, will be disturbed by much more redundant information, can't focus on the relevant information. (6) To exchange information by the fixed social groups, it can increase the college students' understanding level on self and profession and reduce the puzzle of the career decision-making. (7) Students whose significance of employment is “to gain respect from others”, their scores of four factors are far lower than those whose significance of employment is “to reduce the burden of home”. (8) The students who “to gain respect from others” have a longer term in their planning, their goal of professional development is higher, and those who “to reduce the burden of home”, their employment is more blind, think more of the present difficulties. (9) The person who has the finest virtue, doesn't think that he has “virtue”, so is a virtue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生职业决策困难特征及影响因素研究——以浙江理工大学为例
本研究介绍了大学生职业决策困难的特点及其影响因素。参与者为浙江理工大学233名本科生。使用的问卷为职业决策困难问卷(CDDQ;Gati & Saka, 2001)。本研究采用SPSS软件进行分析。结果表明:(1)职业决策困难的结构与国外的测试结果一致,但优柔寡断因素跳入信息缺乏维度。(2)女生的“一般优柔寡断”得分显著高于男生。(3)组间“自我信息缺失”存在显著的年级差异。(4)不同专业群体在“一般优柔寡断”上存在显著差异。(5)无论是否一致,他们都有感兴趣的专业,并能专注于相关信息。没有兴趣的人,会被更多的冗余信息所干扰,无法专注于相关信息。(6)通过固定的社会群体进行信息交流,可以提高大学生对自我和职业的认识水平,减少职业决策的困惑。(7)以“获得他人尊重”为就业意义的学生,其四个因素得分远低于以“减轻家庭负担”为就业意义的学生。(8)“为了获得别人的尊重”的学生,他们的职业发展规划更长远,目标更高,而“为了减轻家庭负担”的学生,他们的就业更盲目,更多地考虑当前的困难。具有最优良美德的人,并不认为自己具有“美德”,所以是一种美德。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Business model innovation for entrepreneurs Theoretical deduction on influence factors of opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship Ergonomic design knowledge base in web-enabled quick response system The transition of Lanzhou National High-tech zone toward sustainability from the perspectives of industrial cluster and industrial ecology Study based QFD on innovation management of supply chain quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1