{"title":"Long-term Retrospective Study on Cumulative Survival Rate of Implants with Guided Bone Regeneration","authors":"Sukhan Jung, Jun-Hwan Kim, Dajeong Namgung, Yun-Jeong Kim, J. Chung, Y. Ku","doi":"10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the cumulative survival rate of dental implants installed with guided bone regeneration (GBR), and also elucidate the factors related with the survival of dental implants. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 148 dental implants installed in 76 patients by one specialist (Y.K.) at the Department of Periodontology and Implant Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital from 2001 to 2010. The cumulative survival rates were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method. The correlations between various factors and dental implant survival were analyzed by using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Among 148 dental implants installed in 76 patients, 8 implants in 7 patients were lost and the cumulative survival rates up to 5-years and 10-years were 97% and 89%, respectively. Gender, smoking status and location of implant were significantly associated with the cumulative survival rate of implants (p < 0.05). Age, history of hypertension and diabetes were not significantly associated with the cumulative survival rate of implants (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The dental implants installed with guided bone regeneration is predictable technique according to the results of cumulative survival rate over 10 years.","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引导骨再生种植体累积成活率的长期回顾性研究
版权所有©2018。韩国口腔颌面种植学会这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons)的开放获取文章。(http://www.licenses/bync/4.0/),允许在任何媒介上不受限制地进行非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。目的:本研究的目的是分析引导骨再生(guided bone regeneration, GBR)种植体的累积成活率,并阐明影响种植体成活率的相关因素。材料与方法:回顾性研究了2001 - 2010年在首尔大学牙科医院牙周病与种植中心由一位专家(Y.K.)对76例患者进行的148例种植体植入。累积存活率采用Kaplan-Meier法计算。采用log-rank检验和Cox比例风险模型分析各因素与种植体存活的相关性。结果:76例患者共植入148颗种植体,7例患者8颗种植体丢失,5年和10年累计生存率分别为97%和89%。性别、吸烟状况、种植体位置与种植体累积成活率有显著相关性(p < 0.05)。年龄、高血压史、糖尿病史与种植体累积成活率无显著相关性(p > 0.05)。结论:从10年以上的累积成活率来看,引导骨再生种植体是一种可预测的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。