Bundling Information Goods and Access – Simulating Competition

Bronwyn E. Howell, P. Potgieter
{"title":"Bundling Information Goods and Access – Simulating Competition","authors":"Bronwyn E. Howell, P. Potgieter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3368062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss the effect of pricing strategies by two firms on the total firm revenue, consumer and total welfare using simulation and numerical analysis. We consider pricing decisions for mixed bundling and where each firm offers two closely related products as well as a bundle. Bundling is a key feature for information goods (Bakos & Brynjolfsson, 1999; Shapiro & Varian, 1999) and we might assume that the market has two differentiated content products (each of which is a bundle of channels, for example, or a bundle of content titles to which access is sold). In many markets, this would be a basic entertainment product and then a sports product or a premium bundle with recent films etc. We can also consider this to be an access and a content product, to consider the issues around merger of content and access firms. In the model for this paper, we introduce a principle of bounded rationality by limiting the ability of the firms to determine revenue-maximising pricing strategies. That means that the firms are able to reduce their effort to find a revenue optimum and will in general find a relatively good solution only but not necessarily an optimum one. Considering the effects of this approach might be useful for both regulators and firms. We also assume that the firms collude to maximise their joint revenue, which we regard as a realistic supposition in a duopoly market. The model can be extended to cover the case where one firm offers/bundles more than two products but this is a topic for future research.","PeriodicalId":433235,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Bounded Rationality (Sub-Topic)","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Bounded Rationality (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We discuss the effect of pricing strategies by two firms on the total firm revenue, consumer and total welfare using simulation and numerical analysis. We consider pricing decisions for mixed bundling and where each firm offers two closely related products as well as a bundle. Bundling is a key feature for information goods (Bakos & Brynjolfsson, 1999; Shapiro & Varian, 1999) and we might assume that the market has two differentiated content products (each of which is a bundle of channels, for example, or a bundle of content titles to which access is sold). In many markets, this would be a basic entertainment product and then a sports product or a premium bundle with recent films etc. We can also consider this to be an access and a content product, to consider the issues around merger of content and access firms. In the model for this paper, we introduce a principle of bounded rationality by limiting the ability of the firms to determine revenue-maximising pricing strategies. That means that the firms are able to reduce their effort to find a revenue optimum and will in general find a relatively good solution only but not necessarily an optimum one. Considering the effects of this approach might be useful for both regulators and firms. We also assume that the firms collude to maximise their joint revenue, which we regard as a realistic supposition in a duopoly market. The model can be extended to cover the case where one firm offers/bundles more than two products but this is a topic for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息商品捆绑与准入——模拟竞争
本文采用模拟和数值分析的方法,讨论了两家企业定价策略对企业总收入、消费者福利和总福利的影响。我们考虑混合捆绑的定价决策,其中每个公司提供两种密切相关的产品以及捆绑。捆绑销售是信息产品的一个关键特征(Bakos & Brynjolfsson, 1999;夏皮罗和瓦里安,1999),我们可以假设市场上有两种不同的内容产品(例如,每一种都是一组频道,或者是一组内容标题,这些内容标题是出售访问权的)。在许多市场中,这将是一个基本的娱乐产品,然后是一个运动产品或与最近的电影等捆绑在一起的高级产品。我们也可以把它看作是一个访问和内容产品,来考虑有关内容和访问公司合并的问题。在本文的模型中,我们通过限制企业确定收益最大化定价策略的能力,引入了有限理性原则。这意味着企业能够减少寻找收益最优的努力,通常只会找到一个相对较好的解决方案,但不一定是最优的解决方案。考虑这种方法的影响可能对监管机构和企业都有帮助。我们还假设两家公司串通以使其共同收入最大化,我们认为这在双寡头垄断市场中是一个现实的假设。该模型可以扩展到一个公司提供/捆绑两种以上产品的情况,但这是一个未来研究的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avoiding Root-Finding in the Krusell-Smith Algorithm Simulation Herding Behaviour and Investment Decisions of Individuals With Fraudulent Microfinance Institutions in Ghana Bounded Rationality, Heuristics, Computational Complexity, and Artificial Intelligence Bundling Information Goods and Access – Simulating Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1