Fuel Hedging, Operational Hedging and Risk Exposure – Evidence from the Global Airline Industry

Britta Berghöfer, B. Lucey
{"title":"Fuel Hedging, Operational Hedging and Risk Exposure – Evidence from the Global Airline Industry","authors":"Britta Berghöfer, B. Lucey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2309510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aviation industry is characterized by low profit margins and a constant struggle with skyrocketing fuel costs. Financial and operational hedging strategies serve aviation managers as a tool to counteract high and volatile fuel prices. While most research on fuel hedging has concentrated on the U.S. airline market, this paper is the first study to include airlines from Asia and Europe. We analyze 64 airlines over 10 years and find that Asian carriers are more negatively exposed than European airlines but less exposed than North American airlines. In contrast to Treanor, Simkins, Rogers and Carter (2012), this study finds less significant negative exposure coefficients among U.S. carriers. Using a fixed effects model we reject the hypothesis that financial hedging decreases risk exposure. One possibility is that the decreased volatility in jet fuel prices over the past few years has perhaps made airlines less exposed to fuel prices and hence, financial hedging less effective. However, operational hedging, defined by two proxies for fleet diversity, reduces exposure significantly. A one percent increase in fleet diversity, calculated with a dispersion index using different aircraft types, reduces the risk exposure coefficient by 2.99 percent. On the other hand, fleet diversity, calculated with different aircraft families, reduces exposure by 1.45 percent. Thus, aviation managers have to balance the fleet diversity between operational flexibility and entailed costs.","PeriodicalId":272897,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Disclosure","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Disclosure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2309510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

The aviation industry is characterized by low profit margins and a constant struggle with skyrocketing fuel costs. Financial and operational hedging strategies serve aviation managers as a tool to counteract high and volatile fuel prices. While most research on fuel hedging has concentrated on the U.S. airline market, this paper is the first study to include airlines from Asia and Europe. We analyze 64 airlines over 10 years and find that Asian carriers are more negatively exposed than European airlines but less exposed than North American airlines. In contrast to Treanor, Simkins, Rogers and Carter (2012), this study finds less significant negative exposure coefficients among U.S. carriers. Using a fixed effects model we reject the hypothesis that financial hedging decreases risk exposure. One possibility is that the decreased volatility in jet fuel prices over the past few years has perhaps made airlines less exposed to fuel prices and hence, financial hedging less effective. However, operational hedging, defined by two proxies for fleet diversity, reduces exposure significantly. A one percent increase in fleet diversity, calculated with a dispersion index using different aircraft types, reduces the risk exposure coefficient by 2.99 percent. On the other hand, fleet diversity, calculated with different aircraft families, reduces exposure by 1.45 percent. Thus, aviation managers have to balance the fleet diversity between operational flexibility and entailed costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
燃油套期保值、运营套期保值和风险敞口——来自全球航空业的证据
航空业的特点是低利润率和不断飙升的燃料成本。财务和运营对冲策略是航空管理人员应对高企和波动的燃油价格的工具。虽然大多数关于燃油套期保值的研究都集中在美国航空公司市场,但本文是第一次将亚洲和欧洲的航空公司纳入研究范围。我们对64家航空公司进行了10年的分析,发现亚洲航空公司比欧洲航空公司受到的负面影响更大,但比北美航空公司受到的负面影响更小。与Treanor、Simkins、Rogers和Carter(2012)相比,本研究发现美国航空公司的负暴露系数不太显著。使用固定效应模型,我们拒绝了金融套期保值降低风险暴露的假设。一种可能性是,过去几年航空燃油价格波动性的下降,可能降低了航空公司受燃油价格影响的程度,从而降低了金融对冲的有效性。然而,运营对冲(由机队多样性的两个代理定义)显著降低了风险敞口。用不同机型的分散指数计算,机队多样性每增加1%,风险暴露系数就会降低2.99%。另一方面,以不同飞机系列计算的机队多样性减少了1.45%的风险。因此,航空管理人员必须在操作灵活性和所需成本之间平衡机队的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Rights Disclosures, Corporate Governance Mechanisms, and Firm Performance: Directions for Future Research Regulating Accountability: An Early Look at the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) A Tale of Two 'Skewness': Managerial Epidemic Experience, Probability Weighting, and Stock Price Crash Risk The Impact of Bank's Internal Governance Mechanism on Operational Loss: Evidence from Turkey Rogue Corporations: Unlawful Corporate Conduct and Fiduciary Duty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1