The BIG system - synergetic graphics

ACM '76 Pub Date : 1976-10-20 DOI:10.1145/800191.805565
C. Quenneville, H. Kriloff
{"title":"The BIG system - synergetic graphics","authors":"C. Quenneville, H. Kriloff","doi":"10.1145/800191.805565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent decrease in the cost of graphics hardware has created an expanded potential opportunity for the use of graphic techniques. However, this potential is reduced by a lack of agreement on the software interface for this graphics environment. In almost every forum that discusses graphical techniques, new systems are introduced that are syntactically unique, but semantically very similar2,8,16. One of the major reasons for this proliferation of graphic systems is the large number of possible tradeoffs that exist between the performance parameters of these devices. Each graphics system can be optimized for a limited number of these parameters by adjusting a feature of the system design until the best results are obtained. Where more than one design feature affects a particular performance parameter, the system designer usually selects a single feature for adjustment and restricts the user's ability to modify any others. The users discover that they cannot adequately adjust that graphics system for their particular problem, leading to the creation of yet another graphics system.\n An evaluation of the techniques that have been used to provide this design factor optimization reveal that applying these techniques in combination provides a greater degree of user control over the graphics environment. This synergetic behavior leads to benefits that can be derived from a graphics system that allows the user a greater variety of implementation options. This flexibility will also allow the user to somewhat compensate for the present lack of a graphics standard. A system that utilizes this methodology is described and examples of its application are shown.","PeriodicalId":379505,"journal":{"name":"ACM '76","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '76","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800191.805565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The recent decrease in the cost of graphics hardware has created an expanded potential opportunity for the use of graphic techniques. However, this potential is reduced by a lack of agreement on the software interface for this graphics environment. In almost every forum that discusses graphical techniques, new systems are introduced that are syntactically unique, but semantically very similar2,8,16. One of the major reasons for this proliferation of graphic systems is the large number of possible tradeoffs that exist between the performance parameters of these devices. Each graphics system can be optimized for a limited number of these parameters by adjusting a feature of the system design until the best results are obtained. Where more than one design feature affects a particular performance parameter, the system designer usually selects a single feature for adjustment and restricts the user's ability to modify any others. The users discover that they cannot adequately adjust that graphics system for their particular problem, leading to the creation of yet another graphics system. An evaluation of the techniques that have been used to provide this design factor optimization reveal that applying these techniques in combination provides a greater degree of user control over the graphics environment. This synergetic behavior leads to benefits that can be derived from a graphics system that allows the user a greater variety of implementation options. This flexibility will also allow the user to somewhat compensate for the present lack of a graphics standard. A system that utilizes this methodology is described and examples of its application are shown.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大系统-协同图形
最近图形硬件成本的下降为图形技术的使用创造了一个扩大的潜在机会。然而,由于在这个图形环境的软件接口上缺乏一致意见,这种潜力被削弱了。在几乎每个讨论图形技术的论坛中,都会引入语法独特但语义非常相似的新系统2,8,16。图形系统激增的主要原因之一是这些设备的性能参数之间存在大量可能的权衡。每个图形系统可以通过调整系统设计的一个特征来优化有限数量的这些参数,直到获得最佳结果。当一个以上的设计特性影响一个特定的性能参数时,系统设计者通常选择一个特性进行调整,并限制用户修改任何其他特性的能力。用户发现,他们不能充分调整图形系统为他们的特定问题,导致创建另一个图形系统。对用于提供此设计因子优化的技术的评估表明,将这些技术组合使用可以为用户提供对图形环境的更大程度的控制。这种协同行为带来的好处可以从图形系统中获得,它允许用户有更多的实现选择。这种灵活性也将允许用户在一定程度上弥补目前图形标准的不足。本文描述了一个利用这种方法的系统,并给出了应用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SIGCUE (Paper and Panel Session) SIGBIO (Paper Session) An efficient sparse minor expansion algorithm Parallel processing and data driven implementation of a relational data base system Computer-based educational communications at the University of Michigan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1