Automated integrative analysis of state-based requirements

Barbara J. Czerny, M. Heimdahl
{"title":"Automated integrative analysis of state-based requirements","authors":"Barbara J. Czerny, M. Heimdahl","doi":"10.1109/ASE.1998.732601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statically analyzing requirements specifications to assure that they possess desirable properties is an important activity in any rigorous software development project. The analysis is performed on an abstraction of the original requirements specification. Abstractions in the model may lead to spurious errors in the analysis output. Spurious errors are conditions that are reported as errors, but information abstracted out of the model precludes the reported conditions from being satisfied. A high ratio of spurious errors to true errors in the analysis output makes it difficult, error-prone, and time consuming to find and correct the true errors. We describe an iterative and integrative approach for analyzing state-based requirements that capitalizes on the strengths of a symbolic analysis component and a reasoning component while circumventing their weaknesses. The resulting analysis method is fast enough and automated enough to be used on a day-to-day basis by practicing engineers, and generates analysis reports with a small ratio of spurious errors to true errors.","PeriodicalId":306519,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 13th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (Cat. No.98EX239)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 13th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (Cat. No.98EX239)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.1998.732601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Statically analyzing requirements specifications to assure that they possess desirable properties is an important activity in any rigorous software development project. The analysis is performed on an abstraction of the original requirements specification. Abstractions in the model may lead to spurious errors in the analysis output. Spurious errors are conditions that are reported as errors, but information abstracted out of the model precludes the reported conditions from being satisfied. A high ratio of spurious errors to true errors in the analysis output makes it difficult, error-prone, and time consuming to find and correct the true errors. We describe an iterative and integrative approach for analyzing state-based requirements that capitalizes on the strengths of a symbolic analysis component and a reasoning component while circumventing their weaknesses. The resulting analysis method is fast enough and automated enough to be used on a day-to-day basis by practicing engineers, and generates analysis reports with a small ratio of spurious errors to true errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于状态的需求的自动集成分析
在任何严格的软件开发项目中,静态分析需求规范以确保它们具有理想的属性是一项重要的活动。分析是在原始需求规范的抽象上执行的。模型中的抽象可能导致分析输出中出现虚假错误。虚假错误是作为错误报告的条件,但是从模型中抽象出来的信息排除了报告的条件不被满足。分析输出中假错误与真错误的高比率使得查找和纠正真错误变得困难、容易出错且耗时。我们描述了一种迭代和集成的方法,用于分析基于状态的需求,该方法利用了符号分析组件和推理组件的优势,同时规避了它们的弱点。由此产生的分析方法足够快,并且足够自动化,可以由实践工程师在日常基础上使用,并且生成的分析报告中假错误与真错误的比例很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASSISTing exit decisions in software inspection Statically checkable design level traits Identifying pre-conditions with the Z/EVES theorem prover Automated integrative analysis of state-based requirements An empirical study of the evolution of a software system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1