Comparison of Dental Caries Level Images Classification Performance using KNN and SVM Methods

Y. Jusman, M. K. Anam, Sartika Puspita, Edwyn Saleh, S. N. A. Kanafiah, Rhesezia Intan Tamarena
{"title":"Comparison of Dental Caries Level Images Classification Performance using KNN and SVM Methods","authors":"Y. Jusman, M. K. Anam, Sartika Puspita, Edwyn Saleh, S. N. A. Kanafiah, Rhesezia Intan Tamarena","doi":"10.1109/ICSIPA52582.2021.9576774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to build a dental caries level classification system based on image processing (i.e. to extract texture features) and machine learning methods. The first step was to analyze and discover the extraction results from Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix algorithm. After successfully extracting the features, the classification was carried out using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Both machine learnings are analyzed and used to obtain the better alternatives of the classification results. This study employed radiographic images of four dental caries classes consisting of Class 1, 2, 3, and 4. Total of images used after pre-processing are 396 images. Training data is 90% of total images then the rest is the testing data. The classification obtained accuracy value of the SVM and KNN. The SVM classification method revealed the highest accuracy value generated by the Fine Gaussian SVM model was 95.7%. Conversely, the lowest accuracy value generated was 83.3%, derived from the Quadratic SVM model. Meanwhile, the highest accuracy by using KNN is 94.9% of accuracy using Fine and lowest accuracy value generated was 91.4%, derived from Weighted KNN models. The KNN classification results are better than the SVM results.","PeriodicalId":326688,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIPA52582.2021.9576774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study aims to build a dental caries level classification system based on image processing (i.e. to extract texture features) and machine learning methods. The first step was to analyze and discover the extraction results from Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix algorithm. After successfully extracting the features, the classification was carried out using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Both machine learnings are analyzed and used to obtain the better alternatives of the classification results. This study employed radiographic images of four dental caries classes consisting of Class 1, 2, 3, and 4. Total of images used after pre-processing are 396 images. Training data is 90% of total images then the rest is the testing data. The classification obtained accuracy value of the SVM and KNN. The SVM classification method revealed the highest accuracy value generated by the Fine Gaussian SVM model was 95.7%. Conversely, the lowest accuracy value generated was 83.3%, derived from the Quadratic SVM model. Meanwhile, the highest accuracy by using KNN is 94.9% of accuracy using Fine and lowest accuracy value generated was 91.4%, derived from Weighted KNN models. The KNN classification results are better than the SVM results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于KNN和SVM方法的龋齿图像分类性能比较
本研究旨在建立一个基于图像处理(即提取纹理特征)和机器学习方法的龋齿级别分类系统。首先对灰度共生矩阵算法的提取结果进行分析和发现。在成功提取特征后,使用支持向量机(SVM)和k近邻(KNN)进行分类。对两种机器学习进行分析并用于获得分类结果的更好替代。本研究采用1、2、3、4级龋的x线图像。预处理后使用的图像总数为396张。训练数据占总图像的90%,剩下的是测试数据。分类得到SVM和KNN的准确率值。SVM分类方法显示,细高斯SVM模型生成的最高准确率值为95.7%。相反,生成的最低准确率值为83.3%,来源于二次型SVM模型。同时,使用KNN模型产生的最高精度为Fine模型的94.9%,加权KNN模型产生的最低精度值为91.4%。KNN分类结果优于SVM分类结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personal Protective Equipment Detection with Live Camera A Fast and Unbiased Minimalistic Resampling Approach for the Particle Filter Sparse Checkerboard Corner Detection from Global Perspective Comparison of Dental Caries Level Images Classification Performance using KNN and SVM Methods An Insight Into the Rise Time of Exponential Smoothing for Speech Enhancement Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1