{"title":"Clinical Results for Maxillary Implant Overdentures with Prosthetic Systems: A Literature Review","authors":"Seonghee Choi, Sunjai Kim, Jae-Seung Chang","doi":"10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Background: The two-implant overdenture should be considered as the first treatment option for mandibular edentulous patients. But for the maxilla, there is no widely accepted consensus yet. In this study, implant survival rate, clinical evaluations, marginal bone loss of the maxillary overdenture were investigated. Materials and Methods: “Maxillary overdenture” was the key word of this study, and with the combination of “attachment system”, “implant number”, “implant survival rate”, “clinical evaluation” and “marginal bone loss”, 21 journals were searched by “Pubmed”. Results: There were no differences in the survival rate according to the attachment systems and implant numbers. Especially, maxillary overdentures with four or more implants showed excellent results. Clinical parameters and marginal bone loss were not affected by attachment systems and implant numbers. Conclusion: For successful maxillary implant overdenture treatment, four or more implants can be considered using various attachment systems.","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/IMPLANTOLOGY.20180010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
上颌种植覆盖义齿修复系统的临床效果:文献综述
版权所有©2018。韩国口腔颌面种植学会这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons)的开放获取文章。(http://www.licenses/bync/4.0/),允许在任何媒介上不受限制地进行非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。背景:双种植体覆盖义齿是下颌无牙患者的首选治疗方案。但是对于上颌骨,目前还没有被广泛接受的共识。本研究对种植体成活率、临床评价、上颌覆盖义齿边缘骨质流失进行了研究。材料与方法:本研究以“上颌覆盖义齿”为关键词,结合“附着系统”、“种植体数量”、“种植体存活率”、“临床评价”和“边缘骨质流失”,在Pubmed检索21种期刊。结果:不同的附着体系统和种植体数量对成活率无显著影响。上颌覆盖义齿有4个或更多种植体,效果较好。临床参数和边缘骨丢失不受附着系统和种植体数量的影响。结论:上颌种植覆盖义齿治疗成功时,可考虑使用不同的附着体系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。