Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds

S. Avin
{"title":"Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds","authors":"S. Avin","doi":"10.13130/2282-5398/8626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are now several proposals for introducing random elements into the process of funding allocation for research, and some initial implementation of this policy by funding bodies. The proposals have been supported on efficiency grounds, with models, including social epistemology models, showing random allocation could increase the generation of significant truths in a community of scientists when compared to funding by peer review. The models in the literature are, however, fairly abstract (by necessity). This paper introduces some of the considerations that are required to build on the modelling work towards a fully-fledged policy proposal, including issues of cost and fairness.","PeriodicalId":296314,"journal":{"name":"RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-5398/8626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

There are now several proposals for introducing random elements into the process of funding allocation for research, and some initial implementation of this policy by funding bodies. The proposals have been supported on efficiency grounds, with models, including social epistemology models, showing random allocation could increase the generation of significant truths in a community of scientists when compared to funding by peer review. The models in the literature are, however, fairly abstract (by necessity). This paper introduces some of the considerations that are required to build on the modelling work towards a fully-fledged policy proposal, including issues of cost and fairness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机分配研究经费的政策考虑
现在有几个建议在研究经费分配过程中引入随机因素,以及资助机构初步实施这一政策。这些建议得到了基于效率的支持,包括社会认识论模型在内的模型显示,与同行评审资助相比,随机分配可以增加科学家群体中重要真理的产生。然而,文献中的模型是相当抽象的(出于必要)。本文介绍了一些需要考虑的因素,这些因素需要建立在建模工作的基础上,以实现一个成熟的政策建议,包括成本和公平问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds Invention through bricolage: epistemic engineering in scientific communities In Praise of Precipitatory Governance as a (Meta-)Principle of Responsible Innovation Social Epistemology at Work: from Philosophical Theory to Policy Advice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1