The association of a positive respiratory or bloodstream culture on outcome in a large, single-center study of predominately rural Georgia patients admitted with COVID-19 in 2020

Omkar Mayur, Jack D Owens, D. Linder, Varghese George, J. Franklin, R. MacArthur
{"title":"The association of a positive respiratory or bloodstream culture on outcome in a large, single-center study of predominately rural Georgia patients admitted with COVID-19 in 2020","authors":"Omkar Mayur, Jack D Owens, D. Linder, Varghese George, J. Franklin, R. MacArthur","doi":"10.30918/irjmms.103.22.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In early 2020, Albany Georgia, located in a predominately rural part of Georgia, had the 4th highest per capita rate of COVID-19 infection in the United States. Many of these patients developed secondary infections or presented with concomitant infections, which were noted anecdotally to be associated with a worse outcome compared to those who did not develop secondary infections. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in the calendar year 2020. We were primarily interested in the effect of respiratory and bloodstream culture positivity on the outcome. We recorded data for other variables potentially contributing to a bad outcome, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Body Mass Index (BMI), age, sex, and race. Variables initially identified as significantly associated with bad outcomes (defined as either need for mechanical ventilation or death) were then analyzed by multinomial regression. During a 10-month period (March to December), 1,431 patients were admitted. Of these, 155 (10.8%) had a positive blood culture and 142 (9.9%) had a positive respiratory culture at any time during admission. Odds ratios (OR) for death or mechanical ventilation without death were 43.0 and 86.1, respectively, for a positive respiratory culture and 4.5 and 3.3, respectively, for a positive blood culture. Age > 70 and CCI also were associated with an increased risk of death, with OR of 2.0 and 1.3, respectively. In conclusion, in our large, single-center study of patients admitted with COVID-19 in the calendar year 2020, positive respiratory culture or a positive blood culture had the highest OR associated with the bad outcome of all the variables considered. Keywords: COVID-19, risk factors, inpatients.","PeriodicalId":170316,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30918/irjmms.103.22.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early 2020, Albany Georgia, located in a predominately rural part of Georgia, had the 4th highest per capita rate of COVID-19 infection in the United States. Many of these patients developed secondary infections or presented with concomitant infections, which were noted anecdotally to be associated with a worse outcome compared to those who did not develop secondary infections. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in the calendar year 2020. We were primarily interested in the effect of respiratory and bloodstream culture positivity on the outcome. We recorded data for other variables potentially contributing to a bad outcome, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Body Mass Index (BMI), age, sex, and race. Variables initially identified as significantly associated with bad outcomes (defined as either need for mechanical ventilation or death) were then analyzed by multinomial regression. During a 10-month period (March to December), 1,431 patients were admitted. Of these, 155 (10.8%) had a positive blood culture and 142 (9.9%) had a positive respiratory culture at any time during admission. Odds ratios (OR) for death or mechanical ventilation without death were 43.0 and 86.1, respectively, for a positive respiratory culture and 4.5 and 3.3, respectively, for a positive blood culture. Age > 70 and CCI also were associated with an increased risk of death, with OR of 2.0 and 1.3, respectively. In conclusion, in our large, single-center study of patients admitted with COVID-19 in the calendar year 2020, positive respiratory culture or a positive blood culture had the highest OR associated with the bad outcome of all the variables considered. Keywords: COVID-19, risk factors, inpatients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项大型单中心研究中,呼吸道或血流培养阳性与2020年收治的主要是乔治亚州农村地区的COVID-19患者的结局之间的关系
2020年初,位于佐治亚州农村地区的奥尔巴尼是美国人均COVID-19感染率第四高的地区。这些患者中有许多发生了继发感染或出现了伴随感染,与没有发生继发感染的患者相比,这些患者的预后更差。我们对菲比·普特尼纪念医院在2020日历年收治的所有患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。我们主要对呼吸和血流培养阳性对结果的影响感兴趣。我们记录了其他可能导致不良结果的变量的数据,包括查理森共病指数(CCI)、体重指数(BMI)、年龄、性别和种族。最初确定为与不良结果(定义为需要机械通气或死亡)显著相关的变量,然后通过多项回归分析。在10个月期间(3月至12月),共收治1431例患者。其中155例(10.8%)血培养阳性,142例(9.9%)呼吸培养阳性。呼吸培养阳性患者死亡或机械通气无死亡的优势比(OR)分别为43.0和86.1,血液培养阳性患者死亡或机械通气无死亡的优势比分别为4.5和3.3。70岁和CCI也与死亡风险增加相关,OR分别为2.0和1.3。总之,在我们对2020日历年入院的COVID-19患者进行的大型单中心研究中,呼吸培养阳性或血液培养阳性与所有考虑的变量的不良结果相关的or最高。关键词:COVID-19,危险因素,住院患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of C-reactive protein and gamma-glutamyl transferase in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome Level of awareness of primigravida about pregnancy and antenatal care at the time of booking in a South West Nigerian tertiary hospital Incidence of anti-HCV found among clinical trial participants during eligibility screening at NovumPRS from 2005 to 2011 Correlation between increased interleukin-6 with insulin resistance in non-diabetic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients Total elbow arthroplasty in type IIIC elbow fracture: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1