A Korean Version of the WHO International Classification for Patient Safety: A Validity Study

Jeongeun Kim, Jaeho Lee, Sunyoon Lee
{"title":"A Korean Version of the WHO International Classification for Patient Safety: A Validity Study","authors":"Jeongeun Kim, Jaeho Lee, Sunyoon Lee","doi":"10.4258/JKSMI.2009.15.4.381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety (ICPS) was released in January 2009. Since then, a Korean version of ICPS was developed. This paper describes the translation process and evaluates the validity of the Korean version. Methods: Two research groups were involved in the development of the Korean version of ICPS. The draft of the Korean version was developed through intensive consultations with experts and extensive consensus building efforts. Subsequently, a modified Delphi method was used to develop the final version. Twenty-one experts, in- cluding professors in medicine and nursing, quality experts, and clinical experts, had been engaged in the process. A back translation was also done to evaluate the validity of the final Korean version. The level of agreement between the original version and the back translated version in terms of 48 key concepts was evaluated. The levels were classified as complete, partial, and no agreement. Results: Thirty concepts (62.5%) agreed completely, 11 concepts (22.9%) agreed partially, and seven concepts (14.6%) had no agreement. Overall, the agreement between the original and the back translation was 85.4%. Conclusion: Because no standard classification currently exists for patient safety in Korea, this Korean version of ICPS can be used as a standard. However, the relevance and utility of this classification must be further evaluated through clinical field tests. (Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics 15-4, 381-392, 2009)","PeriodicalId":255087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/JKSMI.2009.15.4.381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: The conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety (ICPS) was released in January 2009. Since then, a Korean version of ICPS was developed. This paper describes the translation process and evaluates the validity of the Korean version. Methods: Two research groups were involved in the development of the Korean version of ICPS. The draft of the Korean version was developed through intensive consultations with experts and extensive consensus building efforts. Subsequently, a modified Delphi method was used to develop the final version. Twenty-one experts, in- cluding professors in medicine and nursing, quality experts, and clinical experts, had been engaged in the process. A back translation was also done to evaluate the validity of the final Korean version. The level of agreement between the original version and the back translated version in terms of 48 key concepts was evaluated. The levels were classified as complete, partial, and no agreement. Results: Thirty concepts (62.5%) agreed completely, 11 concepts (22.9%) agreed partially, and seven concepts (14.6%) had no agreement. Overall, the agreement between the original and the back translation was 85.4%. Conclusion: Because no standard classification currently exists for patient safety in Korea, this Korean version of ICPS can be used as a standard. However, the relevance and utility of this classification must be further evaluated through clinical field tests. (Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics 15-4, 381-392, 2009)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国版WHO患者安全国际分类:效度研究
目的:国际患者安全分类(ICPS)概念框架于2009年1月发布。此后,开发了韩国版的ICPS。本文描述了翻译过程,并对韩文译本的有效性进行了评价。方法:两个研究组参与了韩国版ICPS的开发。韩文本草案是通过与专家进行深入协商和广泛建立共识的努力拟订的。随后,采用改进的德尔菲法开发最终版本。包括医学、护理学教授、质量专家、临床专家在内的21位专家参与了这一过程。为了验证最终的韩文版本的正确性,还进行了反向翻译。评估了原译本和后译本在48个关键概念方面的一致程度。这些水平被分为完全、部分和不一致。结果:完全同意30个(62.5%),部分同意11个(22.9%),不同意7个(14.6%)。总体而言,原文与后译的一致性为85.4%。结论:由于韩国目前没有患者安全的标准分类,该韩国版ICPS可以作为标准。然而,这种分类的相关性和效用必须通过临床现场试验进一步评估。(韩国医学信息学会杂志15- 4,381 -392,2009)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Quality of Structured Data Entry for the Secondary Use of Electronic Medical Records A Korean Version of the WHO International Classification for Patient Safety: A Validity Study Development and Validation of Archetypes for Nursing Problems in Breast Cancer Patients Comparison of Physicians' and Patients' Perception on the Effect of Internet Health Information Practical Guide to Clinical Data Management by Susanne Prokscha, 2007
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1