Development of New Design Fatigue Curves in Japan: Discussion of Best-Fit Curves Based on Large-Scale Fatigue Tests of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel Plates

M. Takanashi, H. Ueda, Toshiyuki Saito, T. Ogawa, K. Hayashi
{"title":"Development of New Design Fatigue Curves in Japan: Discussion of Best-Fit Curves Based on Large-Scale Fatigue Tests of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel Plates","authors":"M. Takanashi, H. Ueda, Toshiyuki Saito, T. Ogawa, K. Hayashi","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Japan, the Design Fatigue Curve (DFC) Phase 1 and Phase 2 subcommittees were organized under the Atomic Energy Research Committee in the Japan Welding Engineering Society and have proposed new design fatigue curves for carbon, low-alloy, and austenitic stainless steels. To confirm the validity of the proposed design fatigue curves, a Japanese utility collaborative project was launched. In this project, fatigue tests were conducted on large-scale and small-sized specimens, and the test data were provided to the DFC Phase 2 subcommittee. This paper discusses the best-fit curves proposed by the DFC Phase 1 subcommittee, focusing on the results of large-scale fatigue tests for carbon steel and low-alloy steel plates. The fatigue test results for large-scale specimens were compared with the best-fit curve proposed by the DFC Phase 1 subcommittee. This comparison revealed that the fatigue lives given by the proposed curves correspond to those of approximately 1.5–4.0-mm-deep crack initiation in large-scale specimens. In this program, fatigue tests with a mean strain were also carried out on large-scale specimens. These tests found that the fatigue lives were almost equivalent to those of approximately 4.4–7.0-mm-deep crack initiation in large-scale specimens. In determining a design fatigue curve, strain-controlled tests are usually performed on small-sized specimens, and the fatigue life is then defined by the 25% load drop. It is reported that the cracks reach nearly 3–4-mm depth under those 25% drop cycles. The test results confirm that the fatigue lives of large-scale specimens agree with those given by the best-fit curve for carbon and low-alloy steels, and no remarkable size effects exist for the crack depths compared in this study.","PeriodicalId":384066,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3B: Design and Analysis","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3B: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Japan, the Design Fatigue Curve (DFC) Phase 1 and Phase 2 subcommittees were organized under the Atomic Energy Research Committee in the Japan Welding Engineering Society and have proposed new design fatigue curves for carbon, low-alloy, and austenitic stainless steels. To confirm the validity of the proposed design fatigue curves, a Japanese utility collaborative project was launched. In this project, fatigue tests were conducted on large-scale and small-sized specimens, and the test data were provided to the DFC Phase 2 subcommittee. This paper discusses the best-fit curves proposed by the DFC Phase 1 subcommittee, focusing on the results of large-scale fatigue tests for carbon steel and low-alloy steel plates. The fatigue test results for large-scale specimens were compared with the best-fit curve proposed by the DFC Phase 1 subcommittee. This comparison revealed that the fatigue lives given by the proposed curves correspond to those of approximately 1.5–4.0-mm-deep crack initiation in large-scale specimens. In this program, fatigue tests with a mean strain were also carried out on large-scale specimens. These tests found that the fatigue lives were almost equivalent to those of approximately 4.4–7.0-mm-deep crack initiation in large-scale specimens. In determining a design fatigue curve, strain-controlled tests are usually performed on small-sized specimens, and the fatigue life is then defined by the 25% load drop. It is reported that the cracks reach nearly 3–4-mm depth under those 25% drop cycles. The test results confirm that the fatigue lives of large-scale specimens agree with those given by the best-fit curve for carbon and low-alloy steels, and no remarkable size effects exist for the crack depths compared in this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本新设计疲劳曲线的发展:基于大型碳钢和低合金钢板疲劳试验的最佳拟合曲线探讨
在日本,日本焊接工程学会原子能研究委员会下属的设计疲劳曲线(DFC)第一阶段和第二阶段小组委员会提出了碳、低合金和奥氏体不锈钢的新设计疲劳曲线。为了验证所提出的设计疲劳曲线的有效性,日本公用事业公司开展了一个合作项目。本项目对大、小型试件进行了疲劳试验,试验数据提供给DFC第二阶段小组委员会。本文讨论了DFC第一阶段小组委员会提出的最佳拟合曲线,重点讨论了碳钢和低合金钢板的大型疲劳试验结果。将大型试件的疲劳试验结果与DFC第一阶段小组委员会提出的最佳拟合曲线进行了比较。结果表明,该曲线给出的疲劳寿命与大型试样中1.5 ~ 4.0 mm深裂纹起裂时的疲劳寿命相当。在该程序中,还进行了大型试件的平均应变疲劳试验。这些试验发现,在大尺寸试样中,疲劳寿命几乎相当于大约4.4 - 7.0 mm深裂纹起裂的疲劳寿命。在确定设计疲劳曲线时,通常在小尺寸试样上进行应变控制试验,然后用25%的载荷下降来定义疲劳寿命。据报道,在25%的下降循环下,裂纹深度达到近3 - 4毫米。试验结果表明,大尺寸试样的疲劳寿命与碳素钢和低合金钢的最佳拟合曲线吻合,且裂纹深度不存在明显的尺寸效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Evaluation of Finite Element Modeling of Creep Deformation of Fuel Channels in CANDU® Nuclear Reactors Fitness for Service Assessment and Repair of the Liner of a High Pressure Heat Exchanger An Iterative Method for Solving Static Piping Analysis Including Friction Between Pipes and Support Development of New Design Fatigue Curves in Japan: Discussion of Best-Fit Curves Based on Large-Scale Fatigue Tests of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel Plates Assembly of Bolted Flanged and Support Joints for Use in Elevated Temperature Exhaust Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1