Globus and PlanetLab resource management solutions compared

M. Ripeanu, M. Bowman, J. Chase, Ian T Foster, Milan Milenkovic
{"title":"Globus and PlanetLab resource management solutions compared","authors":"M. Ripeanu, M. Bowman, J. Chase, Ian T Foster, Milan Milenkovic","doi":"10.1109/HPDC.2004.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PlanetLab and Globus Toolkit are gaining widespread adoption in their respective communities. Although designed to solve different problems - PlanetLab is deploying a worldwide infrastructure testbed for experimenting with network services, while Globus is offering general, standards-based, software for running distributed applications over aggregated, shared resources - both build infrastructures that enable federated, extensible, and secure resource sharing across trust domains. Thus, it is instructive to compare their resource management solutions. To this end, we review the approaches taken in the two systems, attempt to trace back to starting assumptions the differences in these approaches, and explore scenarios where the two platforms can cooperate to the benefit of both user communities. We believe that this is a key first step to identifying pieces that could be shared by the two communities, pieces that are complementary, and how Globus and PlanetLab might ultimately evolve together.","PeriodicalId":446429,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 13th IEEE International Symposium on High performance Distributed Computing, 2004.","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 13th IEEE International Symposium on High performance Distributed Computing, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPDC.2004.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

PlanetLab and Globus Toolkit are gaining widespread adoption in their respective communities. Although designed to solve different problems - PlanetLab is deploying a worldwide infrastructure testbed for experimenting with network services, while Globus is offering general, standards-based, software for running distributed applications over aggregated, shared resources - both build infrastructures that enable federated, extensible, and secure resource sharing across trust domains. Thus, it is instructive to compare their resource management solutions. To this end, we review the approaches taken in the two systems, attempt to trace back to starting assumptions the differences in these approaches, and explore scenarios where the two platforms can cooperate to the benefit of both user communities. We believe that this is a key first step to identifying pieces that could be shared by the two communities, pieces that are complementary, and how Globus and PlanetLab might ultimately evolve together.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Globus和PlanetLab资源管理解决方案的比较
PlanetLab和Globus Toolkit正在各自的社区中获得广泛采用。PlanetLab是为了解决不同的问题而设计的——PlanetLab正在部署一个全球性的基础设施测试平台,用于试验网络服务,而Globus则提供通用的、基于标准的软件,用于在聚合的、共享的资源上运行分布式应用程序——两者都构建了能够跨信任域实现联合的、可扩展的和安全的资源共享的基础设施。因此,比较它们的资源管理解决方案是有指导意义的。为此,我们回顾了两个系统中采用的方法,试图追溯到这些方法的初始假设差异,并探索两个平台可以合作以造福两个用户社区的场景。我们相信,这是关键的第一步,可以确定两个社区可以共享的部分,互补的部分,以及Globus和PlanetLab最终如何共同发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring and understanding user comfort with resource borrowing Globus and PlanetLab resource management solutions compared FPN: a distributed hash table for commercial applications GAIS: grid advanced information service based on P2P mechanism Utilization of a local grid of Mac OS X-based computers using Xgrid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1