Socioeconomic Assessment of Mandarin Postharvest Loss: A Case of Gandaki Province, Nepal

Y. Acharya, Namdev Upadhyaya, S. Sapkota
{"title":"Socioeconomic Assessment of Mandarin Postharvest Loss: A Case of Gandaki Province, Nepal","authors":"Y. Acharya, Namdev Upadhyaya, S. Sapkota","doi":"10.36956/rwae.v4i1.787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on the socioeconomic assessment of mandarin postharvest loss in the Gandaki Province of Nepal. Two mandarin growing districts Tanahun and Syangja of Gandaki province were selected for study purposes. A simple random method of sampling was employed to select 45 mandarin farmers from each district making a total sample size of 90. Primary data were collected with the help of a pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule along with two focus group discussions and field observation of the mandarin orchard. Data were analyzed by using both descriptive and inferential statistics. This paper explored the mandarin production status, major post-harvest practices, marketing channels, and barriers to post-harvest technology adoption. The findings revealed that farmers were producing 5.4 tons of fresh mandarin each year earning around 50 thousand Nepalese rupees as profit from mandarin farming. Similarly, the result showed that the post-harvest loss was 8%-9% during the harvesting, grading, and packaging operation while a loss of 2%-3% was recorded during the transportation of mandarin from the production site to the wholesaler site. In total, loss ranging from 14%-18% was recorded in all chains of mandarin postharvest operations. Also, it was found that more than two-thirds (76.7%) of farmers practiced mandarin marketing based on preharvest contracts. The technical know-how of farmers about post-harvest technologies was a major challenge associated with the low adoption of mandarin post-harvest technologies. The concerned government agency, I/NGOs, and other organizations need to emphasize post-harvest loss issues by incorporating loss minimization activities in their program ensuring higher adoption of postharvest technologies by mandarin farmers and traders.","PeriodicalId":222396,"journal":{"name":"Research on World Agricultural Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on World Agricultural Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36956/rwae.v4i1.787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focused on the socioeconomic assessment of mandarin postharvest loss in the Gandaki Province of Nepal. Two mandarin growing districts Tanahun and Syangja of Gandaki province were selected for study purposes. A simple random method of sampling was employed to select 45 mandarin farmers from each district making a total sample size of 90. Primary data were collected with the help of a pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule along with two focus group discussions and field observation of the mandarin orchard. Data were analyzed by using both descriptive and inferential statistics. This paper explored the mandarin production status, major post-harvest practices, marketing channels, and barriers to post-harvest technology adoption. The findings revealed that farmers were producing 5.4 tons of fresh mandarin each year earning around 50 thousand Nepalese rupees as profit from mandarin farming. Similarly, the result showed that the post-harvest loss was 8%-9% during the harvesting, grading, and packaging operation while a loss of 2%-3% was recorded during the transportation of mandarin from the production site to the wholesaler site. In total, loss ranging from 14%-18% was recorded in all chains of mandarin postharvest operations. Also, it was found that more than two-thirds (76.7%) of farmers practiced mandarin marketing based on preharvest contracts. The technical know-how of farmers about post-harvest technologies was a major challenge associated with the low adoption of mandarin post-harvest technologies. The concerned government agency, I/NGOs, and other organizations need to emphasize post-harvest loss issues by incorporating loss minimization activities in their program ensuring higher adoption of postharvest technologies by mandarin farmers and traders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柑桔采后损失的社会经济评价——以尼泊尔甘达基省为例
本研究的重点是尼泊尔甘达基省柑橘采后损失的社会经济评估。甘达基省的两个柑橘种植区Tanahun和Syangja被选为研究对象。采用简单随机抽样的方法,从各区选取45名柑农,总样本量为90人。通过预先测试的半结构化访谈时间表,以及两次焦点小组讨论和对柑橘园的实地观察,收集了初步数据。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计。本文探讨了柑橘的生产现状、主要采收方式、营销渠道以及采收技术采用的障碍。调查结果显示,农民每年生产5.4吨新鲜柑橘,从柑橘种植中获得约5万尼泊尔卢比的利润。同样,结果表明,在收获、分级和包装过程中,收获后损失为8%-9%,而在从生产地点到批发商地点的运输过程中,损失为2%-3%。总的来说,在所有柑橘采后操作链中,损失在14%-18%之间。此外,超过三分之二(76.7%)的农民实行基于收获前合同的柑橘营销。农民对收获后技术的技术知识是与采用率低相关的主要挑战。有关的政府机构、非政府组织和其他组织需要通过将损失最小化活动纳入其计划,以强调收获后损失问题,确保农民和贸易商更多地采用采后技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Factors Influencing the Level of Circular Economy Adoption in Agriculture: Insights from Vietnam Machinery Adoption and Its Effect on Maize Productivity among Smallholder Farmers in Western Kenya: Evidence from the Chisel Harrow Tillage Practice Determining Economic Optimum Soil Sampling Density for Potassium Fertilizer Management in Soybean: A Case Study in the U.S. Mid-South Impact of Participation in Young Smart Farmer Program on Smallholder Farmers’ Income: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Understanding Factors of Households' Circular Economy Adoption to Facilitate Sustainable Development in an Emerging Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1