The 'International Licensing Platform – Vegetables': A Prototype of a Patent Clearing House in the Life Science Industry

M. Kock, F. ten Have
{"title":"The 'International Licensing Platform – Vegetables': A Prototype of a Patent Clearing House in the Life Science Industry","authors":"M. Kock, F. ten Have","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2773232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In November 2014, the vegetable seed industry saw the introduction of the International Licensing Platform Vegetable (\"ILP\"). The ILP's main objective is to enable worldwide access to biological material covered by patents for the purpose of vegetable breeding, whilst safeguarding incentives to invest in patentable inventions. As a result the ILP will boost innovation and competition in the industry.This contribution explains the reasons for founding the ILP and introduces its structure and inner workings, including the employment of \"baseball arbitration\" as a pragmatic mechanism for determining royalties in case bilateral negotiations fail. In addition, it explores some of the antitrust related challenges associated with assessing initiatives like the ILP and discusses open questions, limitations and success factors.Given its innovative set-up and structure, the ILP may potentially serve as a prototype for multiparty licensing structures in other industries where intellectual property rights are prevalent and access through conventional licensing negotiation is not satisfactory. However, where it concerns Europe, the suboptimal antitrust guidance currently in place runs the risk of chilling the willingness of private actors to introduce welfare enhancing collaborative licensing initiatives. Accordingly, the (procedural) antitrust landscape in the relevant area arguably warrants reconsideration.","PeriodicalId":306463,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2773232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In November 2014, the vegetable seed industry saw the introduction of the International Licensing Platform Vegetable ("ILP"). The ILP's main objective is to enable worldwide access to biological material covered by patents for the purpose of vegetable breeding, whilst safeguarding incentives to invest in patentable inventions. As a result the ILP will boost innovation and competition in the industry.This contribution explains the reasons for founding the ILP and introduces its structure and inner workings, including the employment of "baseball arbitration" as a pragmatic mechanism for determining royalties in case bilateral negotiations fail. In addition, it explores some of the antitrust related challenges associated with assessing initiatives like the ILP and discusses open questions, limitations and success factors.Given its innovative set-up and structure, the ILP may potentially serve as a prototype for multiparty licensing structures in other industries where intellectual property rights are prevalent and access through conventional licensing negotiation is not satisfactory. However, where it concerns Europe, the suboptimal antitrust guidance currently in place runs the risk of chilling the willingness of private actors to introduce welfare enhancing collaborative licensing initiatives. Accordingly, the (procedural) antitrust landscape in the relevant area arguably warrants reconsideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“蔬菜国际授权平台”:生命科学产业专利结算中心的雏形
2014年11月,蔬菜种子行业引进了国际蔬菜许可平台(“ILP”)。ILP的主要目标是使全世界能够获得用于蔬菜育种的专利所涵盖的生物材料,同时保护对可获得专利的发明的投资激励。因此,ILP将促进该行业的创新和竞争。这篇文章解释了成立ILP的原因,并介绍了其结构和内部运作,包括在双边谈判失败的情况下,采用“棒球仲裁”作为确定版税的实用机制。此外,它还探讨了与评估ILP等倡议相关的一些反垄断相关挑战,并讨论了开放的问题、限制和成功因素。鉴于其创新的设置和结构,ILP可能会成为其他行业的多方许可结构的原型,在这些行业中,知识产权普遍存在,通过传统的许可谈判获取并不令人满意。然而,就欧洲而言,目前的次优反垄断指导有可能使私人行为者引入提高福利的合作许可倡议的意愿降温。因此,相关领域的(程序性)反垄断格局可以说值得重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Competition Overdose': Curing Markets from Themselves? Ten Points for Discussion Exploitative Abuses: Recent Trends and Comparative Perspectives Setting the Edge: How the NCAA Can Defend Amateurism by Allowing Third Party Compensation Competition in Digital Markets: A Review of Expert Reports The Israeli Statute on National Book Price Maintenance - A Critical Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1