Towards accurate detection of obfuscated web tracking

Hoan Le, Federico Fallace, P. Barlet-Ros
{"title":"Towards accurate detection of obfuscated web tracking","authors":"Hoan Le, Federico Fallace, P. Barlet-Ros","doi":"10.1109/IWMN.2017.8078365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web tracking is currently recognized as one of the most important privacy threats on the Internet. Over the last years, many methodologies have been developed to uncover web trackers. Most of them are based on static code analysis and the use of predefined blacklists. However, our main hypothesis is that web tracking has started to use obfuscated programming, a transformation of code that renders previous detection methodologies ineffective and easy to evade. In this paper, we propose a new methodology based on dynamic code analysis that monitors the actual JavaScript calls made by the browser and compares them to the original source code of the website in order to detect obfuscated tracking. The main advantage of this approach is that detection cannot be evaded by code obfuscation. We applied this methodology to detect the use of canvas-font tracking and canvas fingerprinting on the top-10K most visited websites according to Alexa's ranking. Canvas-based tracking is a fingerprinting method based on JavaScript that uses the HTML5 canvas element to uniquely identify a user. Our results show that 10.44% of the top-10K websites use canvas-based tracking (canvas-font and canvas fingerprinting), while obfuscation was used in 2.25% of them. These results confirm our initial hypothesis that obfuscated programming in web tracking is already in use. Finally, we argue that canvas-based tracking can be more present in secondary pages than in the home page of websites.","PeriodicalId":201479,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Measurement and Networking (M&N)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Workshop on Measurement and Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2017.8078365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Web tracking is currently recognized as one of the most important privacy threats on the Internet. Over the last years, many methodologies have been developed to uncover web trackers. Most of them are based on static code analysis and the use of predefined blacklists. However, our main hypothesis is that web tracking has started to use obfuscated programming, a transformation of code that renders previous detection methodologies ineffective and easy to evade. In this paper, we propose a new methodology based on dynamic code analysis that monitors the actual JavaScript calls made by the browser and compares them to the original source code of the website in order to detect obfuscated tracking. The main advantage of this approach is that detection cannot be evaded by code obfuscation. We applied this methodology to detect the use of canvas-font tracking and canvas fingerprinting on the top-10K most visited websites according to Alexa's ranking. Canvas-based tracking is a fingerprinting method based on JavaScript that uses the HTML5 canvas element to uniquely identify a user. Our results show that 10.44% of the top-10K websites use canvas-based tracking (canvas-font and canvas fingerprinting), while obfuscation was used in 2.25% of them. These results confirm our initial hypothesis that obfuscated programming in web tracking is already in use. Finally, we argue that canvas-based tracking can be more present in secondary pages than in the home page of websites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对模糊网页跟踪的准确检测
网络跟踪目前被认为是互联网上最重要的隐私威胁之一。在过去的几年里,已经开发了许多方法来发现网络跟踪器。它们中的大多数是基于静态代码分析和预定义黑名单的使用。然而,我们的主要假设是网络跟踪已经开始使用混淆编程,这是一种代码转换,使以前的检测方法无效且易于逃避。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于动态代码分析的新方法,该方法监视浏览器进行的实际JavaScript调用,并将其与网站的原始源代码进行比较,以检测混淆跟踪。这种方法的主要优点是不能通过代码混淆来逃避检测。根据Alexa的排名,我们应用这种方法来检测在访问量最高的前10k网站上使用画布字体跟踪和画布指纹。基于画布的跟踪是一种基于JavaScript的指纹识别方法,它使用HTML5画布元素来唯一地标识用户。我们的研究结果显示,前10k网站中有10.44%使用基于画布的跟踪(画布字体和画布指纹),而其中2.25%使用了混淆。这些结果证实了我们最初的假设,即web跟踪中的模糊编程已经在使用中。最后,我们认为基于画布的跟踪可以更多地出现在次要页面上,而不是网站的主页上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A crowdfunded personal air quality monitor infrastructure for active life applications An investigation on an interference filtering technique for array diagnosis using sparsity Evaluation of communication latency in industrial IoT applications Roughness assessment of reflector surface via near-field data Measurement system with leaky coaxial cables operating as distributed antennas for UHF-RFID readers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1