[ Double ]

Leander Scholz
{"title":"[ Double ]","authors":"Leander Scholz","doi":"10.32388/nolxu7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"adverse prognostic factor in ovarian cancer.6 It is known that inducible Tregs and Th17 cells share a reciprocal differentiation pathway from uncommitted CD4 precursors.4 In the current study, the authors show that macrophages isolated from ovarian tumors biased the in vitro differentiation of uncommitted CD4 T cells toward Th17 cells. Therefore, the observed inverse correlation between Th17 cells and Tregs in tumors may reflect differing conditions within different tumors, favoring either inflammation (Th17) or suppression (Tregs). Furthermore, the Th17 and Treg lineages have recently been shown to be rather more plastic than previously thought, with several studies suggesting the possibility of interconversion between the 2 lineages.7 Thus, the inverse relationship between Th17 cells and Tregs observed in ovarian cancers may be more than simply a descriptive association. It may reflect fundamental differences in the nature of the spontaneous antitumor immune response—differences that appear to have significant impact on patient survival. Finally, the Th17 cells in ovarian cancers were found to simultaneously express high levels of multiple other proinflammatory effector cytokines (IL-2, TNF, IFN) in addition to IL-17 (panel B in the figure). In other settings, this so-called polyfunctional pattern of effector cytokine production has been associated with robust CD4 response to infection and vaccination.8 Other investigators, including myself, have reported similar polyfunctional cytokine response by Th17like cells in mouse tumor models as well.9 Thus, taken together, Kryczek et al have described a functionally important and hitherto unrecognized population of CD4 T cells in ovarian cancers that favor enhanced inflammatory responses and reduced Treg-mediated suppression. The presence of these polyfunctional Th17 cells was statistically associated with better clinical outcome. This raises the question of whether a similar population could be therapeutically induced or expanded (eg, by vaccines or other active immunotherapy), and if this would likewise result in improved patient outcome. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. ■","PeriodicalId":326028,"journal":{"name":"Gesichter des Films","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesichter des Films","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/nolxu7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

adverse prognostic factor in ovarian cancer.6 It is known that inducible Tregs and Th17 cells share a reciprocal differentiation pathway from uncommitted CD4 precursors.4 In the current study, the authors show that macrophages isolated from ovarian tumors biased the in vitro differentiation of uncommitted CD4 T cells toward Th17 cells. Therefore, the observed inverse correlation between Th17 cells and Tregs in tumors may reflect differing conditions within different tumors, favoring either inflammation (Th17) or suppression (Tregs). Furthermore, the Th17 and Treg lineages have recently been shown to be rather more plastic than previously thought, with several studies suggesting the possibility of interconversion between the 2 lineages.7 Thus, the inverse relationship between Th17 cells and Tregs observed in ovarian cancers may be more than simply a descriptive association. It may reflect fundamental differences in the nature of the spontaneous antitumor immune response—differences that appear to have significant impact on patient survival. Finally, the Th17 cells in ovarian cancers were found to simultaneously express high levels of multiple other proinflammatory effector cytokines (IL-2, TNF, IFN) in addition to IL-17 (panel B in the figure). In other settings, this so-called polyfunctional pattern of effector cytokine production has been associated with robust CD4 response to infection and vaccination.8 Other investigators, including myself, have reported similar polyfunctional cytokine response by Th17like cells in mouse tumor models as well.9 Thus, taken together, Kryczek et al have described a functionally important and hitherto unrecognized population of CD4 T cells in ovarian cancers that favor enhanced inflammatory responses and reduced Treg-mediated suppression. The presence of these polyfunctional Th17 cells was statistically associated with better clinical outcome. This raises the question of whether a similar population could be therapeutically induced or expanded (eg, by vaccines or other active immunotherapy), and if this would likewise result in improved patient outcome. Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. ■
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[双]
卵巢癌的不良预后因素分析众所周知,可诱导的Tregs和Th17细胞与未承诺的CD4前体共享互惠分化途径在目前的研究中,作者表明,从卵巢肿瘤中分离的巨噬细胞使未承诺的CD4 T细胞在体外向Th17细胞分化。因此,观察到的肿瘤中Th17细胞与Tregs之间的负相关可能反映了不同肿瘤内的不同情况,要么有利于炎症(Th17),要么有利于抑制(Tregs)。此外,Th17和Treg谱系最近被证明比以前认为的更具可塑性,有几项研究表明这两个谱系之间存在相互转换的可能性因此,在卵巢癌中观察到的Th17细胞和Tregs之间的负相关关系可能不仅仅是一种简单的描述性关联。这可能反映了自发抗肿瘤免疫反应本质上的根本差异,这些差异似乎对患者的生存有重大影响。最后,我们发现卵巢癌中的Th17细胞除了IL-17外,还同时高水平表达其他多种促炎效应细胞因子(IL-2、TNF、IFN)(图中B组)。在其他情况下,这种所谓的效应细胞因子产生的多功能模式与对感染和疫苗接种的强劲CD4反应有关包括我在内的其他研究者也报道了类似的th17样细胞在小鼠肿瘤模型中的多功能细胞因子反应因此,综上所述,Kryczek等人描述了一种功能重要且迄今未被识别的卵巢癌CD4 T细胞群,它有利于增强炎症反应和减少treg介导的抑制。这些多功能Th17细胞的存在与更好的临床结果在统计学上相关。这就提出了一个问题,即是否可以通过治疗方法诱导或扩大类似的人群(例如,通过疫苗或其他主动免疫疗法),以及这是否同样会改善患者的预后。利益冲突披露:作者声明没有竞争的经济利益。■
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[ Lächeln ] [ Oberfläche ] [ Rasur ] [ Double ] [ Autorinnen und Autoren ]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1