Instability Functional Training: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Coaches

Abstract

Instability Functional Training (IFT) has been a popular form of program design in personal training certifications, and thus, widely accepted among trainers and coaches when creating programs for their clients. Training philosophies around this exercise style have been plotted in various directions, ranging from mainstream advocacy to vehement opposition. It is common practice for personal trainers to utilize unstable training and blanket all clients into this methodology in specific and non-specific exercise programs. The research does support its viability in clinical rehabilitation settings; however, it may not benefit a healthier population and may even undermine their goals. We ask trainers and coaches to consider their current position on the validity of IFT and to examine the evidence when programming it for the general public whose primary goal is to improve how they look (e.g., lose fat mass and increase lean body mass). Therefore, this article aims to help identify the merit of instability functional training, objectively review the current literature and recommend a practical approach for trainers and coaches when designing general exercise programs for clients with aesthetic goals.