Validating Simulation Environments for Automated Driving Systems Using 3D Object Comparison Metric

Anne Wallace, S. Khastgir, Xizhe Zhang, S. Brewerton, B. Anctil, Peter Burns, Dominique Charlebois, P. Jennings
{"title":"Validating Simulation Environments for Automated Driving Systems Using 3D Object Comparison Metric","authors":"Anne Wallace, S. Khastgir, Xizhe Zhang, S. Brewerton, B. Anctil, Peter Burns, Dominique Charlebois, P. Jennings","doi":"10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main challenges for the introduction of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) is their verification and validation (V&V). Simulation based testing has been widely accepted as an essential aspect of the ADS V&V processes. Simulations are especially useful when exposing the ADS to challenging driving scenarios, as they offer a safe and efficient alternative to real world testing. It is thus suggested that evidence for the safety case for an ADS will include results from both simulation and real-world testing. However, for simulation results to be trusted as part of the safety case of an ADS for its safety assurance, it is essential to prove that the simulation results are representative of the real world, thus validating the simulation platform itself. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology for validating the simulation environments focusing on comparing point cloud data from real LiDAR sensor and a simulated LiDAR sensor model. A 3D object dissimilarity metric is proposed to compare between the two maps (real and simulated), to quantify how accurate the simulation is. This metric is tested on collected LiDAR point cloud data and the simulated point cloud generated in the simulated environment.","PeriodicalId":184622,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the main challenges for the introduction of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) is their verification and validation (V&V). Simulation based testing has been widely accepted as an essential aspect of the ADS V&V processes. Simulations are especially useful when exposing the ADS to challenging driving scenarios, as they offer a safe and efficient alternative to real world testing. It is thus suggested that evidence for the safety case for an ADS will include results from both simulation and real-world testing. However, for simulation results to be trusted as part of the safety case of an ADS for its safety assurance, it is essential to prove that the simulation results are representative of the real world, thus validating the simulation platform itself. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology for validating the simulation environments focusing on comparing point cloud data from real LiDAR sensor and a simulated LiDAR sensor model. A 3D object dissimilarity metric is proposed to compare between the two maps (real and simulated), to quantify how accurate the simulation is. This metric is tested on collected LiDAR point cloud data and the simulated point cloud generated in the simulated environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用3D对象比较度量验证自动驾驶系统的仿真环境
引入自动驾驶系统(ads)的主要挑战之一是其验证和验证(V&V)。基于仿真的测试已被广泛接受为ADS V&V过程的一个重要方面。在将ADS暴露于具有挑战性的驾驶场景时,模拟尤其有用,因为它们为真实世界的测试提供了一种安全高效的替代方案。因此,建议对ADS的安全案例的证据将包括模拟和实际测试的结果。然而,为了使仿真结果作为ADS安全案例的一部分得到信任,以保证其安全性,必须证明仿真结果代表了真实世界,从而验证了仿真平台本身。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法来验证仿真环境,重点是比较来自真实激光雷达传感器和模拟激光雷达传感器模型的点云数据。提出了一个三维物体不相似度度量来比较两个地图(真实和模拟),以量化模拟的准确性。在采集的激光雷达点云数据和模拟环境中生成的模拟点云上对该度量进行了测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Conflict Mitigation for Cooperative Driving Control of Intelligent Vehicles Detecting vehicles in the dark in urban environments - A human benchmark A Sequential Decision-theoretic Method for Detecting Mobile Robots Localization Failures Scene Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Pedestrian Intention Estimation What Can be Seen is What You Get: Structure Aware Point Cloud Augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1