Pengaruh Lama Penyimpanan Adonan Pada Metode Autolisis Dalam Pembuatan Donat Terhadap Daya Terima Konsumen

Farhansyah Muhammadien, Guspri Devi Artanti, Cucu Cahyana
{"title":"Pengaruh Lama Penyimpanan Adonan Pada Metode Autolisis Dalam Pembuatan Donat Terhadap Daya Terima Konsumen","authors":"Farhansyah Muhammadien, Guspri Devi Artanti, Cucu Cahyana","doi":"10.24114/jnc.v1i2.26155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the effect of dough storage time on the autolysis method in making donuts on consumer acceptance. This study used an experimental method with the treatment of differences in storage time for dough with autolysis methods in making donuts with different lengths of time, namely 40 minutes, 60 minutes, and 80 minutes. Organoleptic analysis was carried out using a hedonic quality test on volume, skin color, frying average, shape, skin character, pores, aroma, crumb color, taste, tissue texture, quality of chewing, and oil absorption rate with 5 aspects of a rating scale and carried out by 3 trained panelists. Based on the results of the long test of dough storage on the autolysis method in making donuts, it has the highest average volume aspect, namely 4.3 with a large scale rating. The assessment of the skin color aspect has the highest average value, namely 4.7 with a brownish yellow rating scale. The assessment of the average aspect of the frying pan has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with an average rating scale. The shape aspect assessment has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with a round rating scale, the hole is in the middle of a small circle. Assessment of skin character aspects has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with a soft rating scale. The assessment of the pores aspect has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with a small rating scale. The results of donuts made using the autolysis method showed that the results of the hypothesis test were statistically significant and not significantly different (α = 0.05). Statistically, the organoleptic test results at an error rate of 0.05 did not show significantly different results in the aspects of shape, volume, skin color, aroma, crumb color, pores, tenderness, and chewing quality of donuts made using the autolysis method.","PeriodicalId":415825,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gizi dan Kuliner (Journal of Nutrition and Culinary)","volume":"657 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gizi dan Kuliner (Journal of Nutrition and Culinary)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/jnc.v1i2.26155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of dough storage time on the autolysis method in making donuts on consumer acceptance. This study used an experimental method with the treatment of differences in storage time for dough with autolysis methods in making donuts with different lengths of time, namely 40 minutes, 60 minutes, and 80 minutes. Organoleptic analysis was carried out using a hedonic quality test on volume, skin color, frying average, shape, skin character, pores, aroma, crumb color, taste, tissue texture, quality of chewing, and oil absorption rate with 5 aspects of a rating scale and carried out by 3 trained panelists. Based on the results of the long test of dough storage on the autolysis method in making donuts, it has the highest average volume aspect, namely 4.3 with a large scale rating. The assessment of the skin color aspect has the highest average value, namely 4.7 with a brownish yellow rating scale. The assessment of the average aspect of the frying pan has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with an average rating scale. The shape aspect assessment has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with a round rating scale, the hole is in the middle of a small circle. Assessment of skin character aspects has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with a soft rating scale. The assessment of the pores aspect has the highest average value, namely 4.3 with a small rating scale. The results of donuts made using the autolysis method showed that the results of the hypothesis test were statistically significant and not significantly different (α = 0.05). Statistically, the organoleptic test results at an error rate of 0.05 did not show significantly different results in the aspects of shape, volume, skin color, aroma, crumb color, pores, tenderness, and chewing quality of donuts made using the autolysis method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面糊长期保存对甜甜圈制造过程中的自利方法的影响,对消费者的收据的影响
本研究旨在分析面团存放时间对油炸圈饼自溶方法对消费者接受度的影响。本研究采用不同时间(40分钟、60分钟、80分钟)的自溶法处理面团存放时间差异的实验方法制作甜甜圈。感官分析由3名训练有素的小组成员进行,采用享乐质量测试,包括体积、皮肤颜色、油炸平均水平、形状、皮肤特征、毛孔、香气、碎屑颜色、味道、组织质地、咀嚼质量和吸油率5个方面的评定量表。对油炸圈饼自溶法的面团长期贮存试验结果表明,其平均体积方面最高,为4.3,具有较大的规模等级。肤色方面的评估有最高的平均值,即4.7与棕黄评分量表。煎锅的平均方面的评估有最高的平均值,即4.3分,平均评分量表。形状方面评价的平均值最高,为4.3,采用圆形评定量表,孔位于一个小圆圈的中间。皮肤特征方面的评估的平均值最高,为4.3,采用软评分量表。孔隙方面的评价平均值最高,为4.3,评分尺度较小。用自溶法制作的甜甜圈的结果显示,假设检验的结果具有统计学意义,差异不显著(α = 0.05)。统计上,在错误率为0.05的情况下,采用自溶法制作的甜甜圈在形状、体积、皮肤颜色、香气、面包屑颜色、毛孔、柔软度、咀嚼质量等方面的感官测试结果无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diet Tinggi Serat Menurunkan Berat Badan pada Obesitas ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN GADGET PADA SISWA SMP SELAMA PANDEMI DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN STATUS GIZI Perbedaan Penggunaan Metode Japanese, Taiwanese dan Sponge & Dough terhadap Kualitas Hokkaido Mild Bread Pengaruh Penggunaan Ragi Alami Ekstrak Buah Jambu Air Cincalo Merah (Syzygium samarangense) pada Pembuatan Kue Kamir Terhadap Daya Terima Konsumen Perbedaan Penggunaan Tepung Singkong Dan Tepung Mocaf Pada Pembuatan Ledre Pisang Terhadap Kualitas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1