PHILANTHROCAPITALISM AS A BIOETHICAL ISSUE

Ivica Kelam, Darija Rupčić Kelam, Aleksandar Racz
{"title":"PHILANTHROCAPITALISM AS A BIOETHICAL ISSUE","authors":"Ivica Kelam, Darija Rupčić Kelam, Aleksandar Racz","doi":"10.5593/SGEMSOCIALF2018/1.6/S01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philanthropy is one of the fastest growing industries in the global economy. Philanthropic billionaires have unprecedented power in creating education policy, directing the development of global agriculture and dictating trends in global health policy. According to its critics, instead of an altruistic aid, philanthropic capitalism is, in essence, an ultimate way of gaining profit under the guise of humanity. Large charities replace state institutions as social service providers. Due to the size of donations, financial power and political influence, philanthrocapitalists, such as Bill Gates, successfully embody their vision of global problem solving and by doing that they focus on the consequences rather than removing the causes. In this paper we will explain the basic settings of philanthrocapitalism and point out the issues it raises in society. Through the example of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, we will explain the three basic negative aspects of philanthrocapitalism, namely antidemocracy, paternalism and amateurism, and we will explain why philanthrocapitalism should be a focus of bioethical discussions, since philanthrocapitalists have an increasing role in creating public policies","PeriodicalId":356015,"journal":{"name":"5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Modern Science","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Modern Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIALF2018/1.6/S01.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philanthropy is one of the fastest growing industries in the global economy. Philanthropic billionaires have unprecedented power in creating education policy, directing the development of global agriculture and dictating trends in global health policy. According to its critics, instead of an altruistic aid, philanthropic capitalism is, in essence, an ultimate way of gaining profit under the guise of humanity. Large charities replace state institutions as social service providers. Due to the size of donations, financial power and political influence, philanthrocapitalists, such as Bill Gates, successfully embody their vision of global problem solving and by doing that they focus on the consequences rather than removing the causes. In this paper we will explain the basic settings of philanthrocapitalism and point out the issues it raises in society. Through the example of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, we will explain the three basic negative aspects of philanthrocapitalism, namely antidemocracy, paternalism and amateurism, and we will explain why philanthrocapitalism should be a focus of bioethical discussions, since philanthrocapitalists have an increasing role in creating public policies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为生命伦理问题的慈善资本主义
慈善事业是全球经济中发展最快的行业之一。慈善事业的亿万富翁在制定教育政策、指导全球农业发展和决定全球卫生政策趋势方面拥有前所未有的权力。根据其批评者,而不是利他主义的援助,慈善资本主义,在本质上,是一个最终的方式获得利润的幌子下的人性。大型慈善机构取代了国家机构,成为社会服务提供者。由于捐款的规模、财力和政治影响力,像比尔·盖茨这样的慈善资本家成功地体现了他们解决全球问题的愿景,通过这样做,他们关注的是后果,而不是消除原因。本文将解释慈善资本主义的基本背景,并指出它在社会中引起的问题。通过比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会的例子,我们将解释慈善资本主义的三个基本负面方面,即反民主,家长式和业余主义,我们将解释为什么慈善资本主义应该成为生物伦理讨论的焦点,因为慈善资本家在制定公共政策方面发挥着越来越大的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDUCATION AND POLICY: HUMAN CAPITAL FACTOR MODELLING OF EXTREME DAMAGES IN INSURANCE DEVELOPING THE PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES OF ROMA ADULTS BY INTERGENERATIONAL LEARNING IDENTIFYING RISK-APPETITE FOR FINANCIAL MARKET INFRASTRUCTURES PHILANTHROCAPITALISM AS A BIOETHICAL ISSUE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1