SUBJECT TEACHERS AND ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENTS’ ENGLISH PROFICIENCY IN SELECTED SENIOR SIX CLASSROOMS IN RWANDA

Speciose N. Ndimurugero, Gloriose Mugirase
{"title":"SUBJECT TEACHERS AND ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENTS’ ENGLISH PROFICIENCY IN SELECTED SENIOR SIX CLASSROOMS IN RWANDA","authors":"Speciose N. Ndimurugero, Gloriose Mugirase","doi":"10.36315/2020end098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted in Sixth Form schools in Huye District in Rwanda. The researchers’ concern was that most secondary school leavers enter university with low proficiency in English, the medium of instruction. The researchers focused on subject teachers because subject-related courses are allotted more hours than English. The study aimed to explore whether subject teachers offered any assistance in boosting students’ English proficiency. The research drew on Language across the Curriculum (LAC) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approaches. LAC stipulates that all teachers are language teachers, that subject teachers and language teachers should work jointly, and that language should be taught across the curriculum. CLIL recommends that content be learnt through a second language and that the subject and the language be taught at the same time. For validity and reliability purposes, the current study made use of both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. Findings revealed that only some of the subject teachers used strategies that could help promote their students’ English proficiency. Findings also indicated that content and English language teachers did not collaborate and that the students were not proficient in English. In accordance with these findings, recommendations were made.","PeriodicalId":256716,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2020","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2020end098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was conducted in Sixth Form schools in Huye District in Rwanda. The researchers’ concern was that most secondary school leavers enter university with low proficiency in English, the medium of instruction. The researchers focused on subject teachers because subject-related courses are allotted more hours than English. The study aimed to explore whether subject teachers offered any assistance in boosting students’ English proficiency. The research drew on Language across the Curriculum (LAC) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approaches. LAC stipulates that all teachers are language teachers, that subject teachers and language teachers should work jointly, and that language should be taught across the curriculum. CLIL recommends that content be learnt through a second language and that the subject and the language be taught at the same time. For validity and reliability purposes, the current study made use of both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. Findings revealed that only some of the subject teachers used strategies that could help promote their students’ English proficiency. Findings also indicated that content and English language teachers did not collaborate and that the students were not proficient in English. In accordance with these findings, recommendations were made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卢旺达选定的高中六年级教室中进行学科教师和学生英语水平的提高
本研究在卢旺达胡耶区的六年级学校进行。研究人员担心的是,大多数中学毕业生进入大学时,英语(教学媒介)的熟练程度较低。研究人员把重点放在学科教师身上,因为与学科相关的课程比英语的课时分配得更多。本研究旨在探讨学科教师是否在提高学生英语水平方面提供了帮助。该研究借鉴了跨课程语言(LAC)和内容与语言综合学习(CLIL)方法。LAC规定所有教师都是语言教师,学科教师和语言教师应该共同工作,语言应该在整个课程中教授。CLIL建议通过第二语言学习内容,并同时教授主题和语言。为了达到效度和信度的目的,本研究采用了定性和定量的数据收集和分析方法。调查结果显示,只有部分学科教师使用了有助于提高学生英语水平的策略。调查结果还表明,内容和英语语言教师没有合作,学生不精通英语。根据这些调查结果,提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FACTORS INFLUENCING TEACHERS’ INCLINATION TO USE IMPROVISED RESOURCES IN LIFE SCIENCES CLASSROOMS SUBJECT TEACHERS AND ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENTS’ ENGLISH PROFICIENCY IN SELECTED SENIOR SIX CLASSROOMS IN RWANDA MOOCS FOR BRIDGING THE SCHOOL - UNIVERSITY GAP PRE-SERVICE ENGINEER EDUCATORS LEARNING MATHEMATICS: MAPPING THE LIVED COMPLEXITY THE AFFORDANCES OF IMPROVISED RESOURCES IN PHYSICAL SCIENCES CLASSROOMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1