Asymmetric Network Effects in the Integration of Digital Platforms

Zhijun Yan, Hangzhou Yang, Lin Jia, Yong Tan
{"title":"Asymmetric Network Effects in the Integration of Digital Platforms","authors":"Zhijun Yan, Hangzhou Yang, Lin Jia, Yong Tan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3871279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have witnessed an increasing number of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) between two-sided digital platforms, generally involving a unidirectional resource transfer policy from the acquired to the acquiring platform. This scenario may incur an asymmetric network effect that has not been explored in the extant literature. Using a unique dataset from Dianping and Meituan, two digital platforms similar to Yelp, we explore whether and how the unidirectional data integration policy causes a positive network effect, as reflected by the increments of user engagement on each side of the M&A. We measure user engagement in two dimensions, namely, quantity measures (e.g., number of total reviews) and quality measures (e.g., number of reviews with pictures and length of review). The results show that the policy enhances both measures of user engagement for the acquired and acquiring platforms but that its effects on user engagement on the acquiring platform are larger than those on the acquired platform. We propose three mechanisms: the network size effect, self-image management effect, and social learning effect to explain the possible impacts of platform integration on user engagement, and we conduct single-group interrupted time-series analyses to test the effects. We further conduct three sets of supplementary analyses. We find that, first, the policy not only expands its user base but also boosts the contribution enthusiasm of current users. Second, we clarify how the benefits of platform integration are shaped by merchant features such as per capita consumption and whether a merchant has chain stores. Third, we focus on the multi-homing phenomenon of merchants and find that multi-homing merchants benefit more from platform integration. The findings of this study deepen our understanding of the connections between unidirectional resource transfer and the asymmetric network effect in the context of the integration of two digital platforms.","PeriodicalId":370988,"journal":{"name":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eBusiness & eCommerce eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We have witnessed an increasing number of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) between two-sided digital platforms, generally involving a unidirectional resource transfer policy from the acquired to the acquiring platform. This scenario may incur an asymmetric network effect that has not been explored in the extant literature. Using a unique dataset from Dianping and Meituan, two digital platforms similar to Yelp, we explore whether and how the unidirectional data integration policy causes a positive network effect, as reflected by the increments of user engagement on each side of the M&A. We measure user engagement in two dimensions, namely, quantity measures (e.g., number of total reviews) and quality measures (e.g., number of reviews with pictures and length of review). The results show that the policy enhances both measures of user engagement for the acquired and acquiring platforms but that its effects on user engagement on the acquiring platform are larger than those on the acquired platform. We propose three mechanisms: the network size effect, self-image management effect, and social learning effect to explain the possible impacts of platform integration on user engagement, and we conduct single-group interrupted time-series analyses to test the effects. We further conduct three sets of supplementary analyses. We find that, first, the policy not only expands its user base but also boosts the contribution enthusiasm of current users. Second, we clarify how the benefits of platform integration are shaped by merchant features such as per capita consumption and whether a merchant has chain stores. Third, we focus on the multi-homing phenomenon of merchants and find that multi-homing merchants benefit more from platform integration. The findings of this study deepen our understanding of the connections between unidirectional resource transfer and the asymmetric network effect in the context of the integration of two digital platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字平台集成中的非对称网络效应
我们目睹了越来越多的双边数字平台之间的并购(M&A),通常涉及从被收购方到收购方的单向资源转移政策。这种情况可能会导致不对称网络效应,这在现有文献中尚未得到探讨。利用来自大众点评和美团这两个类似Yelp的数字平台的独特数据集,我们探讨了单向数据整合政策是否以及如何产生积极的网络效应,这反映在M& a两侧的用户参与度增量上。我们从两个维度衡量用户参与度,即数量度量(例如,总评论数)和质量度量(例如,带有图片的评论数和评论长度)。结果表明,该政策增强了已获取平台和获取平台的用户粘性,但其对获取平台的用户粘性的影响大于已获取平台。我们提出了三种机制:网络规模效应、自我形象管理效应和社会学习效应来解释平台整合对用户参与度的可能影响,并进行了单组中断时间序列分析来检验这种影响。我们进一步进行了三组补充分析。我们发现,首先,该政策不仅扩大了其用户群,而且提高了现有用户的贡献热情。其次,我们阐明了平台整合的好处是如何受到商户特征的影响的,比如人均消费和商户是否拥有连锁店。第三,我们关注商家的多归现象,发现多归商家从平台整合中获益更多。本研究的发现加深了我们对数字平台一体化背景下单向资源转移与非对称网络效应之间关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advertising as Information for Ranking E-Commerce Search Listings Adaptive Price Mechanism and a Sequential Reverse Auction Model in Social Commerce Asymmetric Network Effects in the Integration of Digital Platforms Is COVID-19 Reshaping Consumer Buying Behavior? Understanding the Problems and Issues of Online Purchase in Nepal The Pricing Strategies of Online Grocery Retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1