Multilateral Principles in a Bilateral World

L. Mistelis, G. Rao
{"title":"Multilateral Principles in a Bilateral World","authors":"L. Mistelis, G. Rao","doi":"10.1163/27725650-01010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMultilateralism in international investment law is a multifaceted concept with a complex and eventful history. Multilateralism is a paradigm for international investment relations and is also present in the caselaw of investment arbitral tribunals, regardless of whether they consider bilateral or multilateral investment treaties. Indeed, in most cases, they interpret treaty provisions as part of a multilateral system. Further, multilateralism is present every time States act in concert with other States or consider other States’ investors’ legitimate interests.\nIt also emerges that, in some instances, multilateralism has become mandatory. For example, this is the case concerning sustainable development or climate change. In these areas, international law requires multilateralism. States are under an obligation to co-operate for purposes of achieving or promoting multilateral solutions. However, concerning the international investment law context, such a concept is not present. The general assumption is that States’ participation in multilateral practises is left to their discretion: it is voluntary or consensual. In this article, we question that assumption.\nIn this article, we offer a brief review of multilateral experiences in international investment law in the 20th century and provide an analysis of multilateralism in a historical context. Then we turn our attention to the current state of affairs to appreciate it in light of the past. Further, we discuss the future, and in particular, mandatory multilateralism in international law with respect to sustainable development. Here we identify the principles, which might justify mandatory multilateral approaches. Finally, we consider whether the principles justifying mandatory multilateralism in international law are applicable in the context of international investment law as well. We attempt to answer this question in the affirmative and point out further areas of research.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-01010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multilateralism in international investment law is a multifaceted concept with a complex and eventful history. Multilateralism is a paradigm for international investment relations and is also present in the caselaw of investment arbitral tribunals, regardless of whether they consider bilateral or multilateral investment treaties. Indeed, in most cases, they interpret treaty provisions as part of a multilateral system. Further, multilateralism is present every time States act in concert with other States or consider other States’ investors’ legitimate interests. It also emerges that, in some instances, multilateralism has become mandatory. For example, this is the case concerning sustainable development or climate change. In these areas, international law requires multilateralism. States are under an obligation to co-operate for purposes of achieving or promoting multilateral solutions. However, concerning the international investment law context, such a concept is not present. The general assumption is that States’ participation in multilateral practises is left to their discretion: it is voluntary or consensual. In this article, we question that assumption. In this article, we offer a brief review of multilateral experiences in international investment law in the 20th century and provide an analysis of multilateralism in a historical context. Then we turn our attention to the current state of affairs to appreciate it in light of the past. Further, we discuss the future, and in particular, mandatory multilateralism in international law with respect to sustainable development. Here we identify the principles, which might justify mandatory multilateral approaches. Finally, we consider whether the principles justifying mandatory multilateralism in international law are applicable in the context of international investment law as well. We attempt to answer this question in the affirmative and point out further areas of research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双边世界中的多边原则
国际投资法中的多边主义是一个多层面的概念,有着复杂多变的历史。多边主义是国际投资关系的范例,也存在于投资仲裁法庭的判例法中,无论它们是否考虑双边或多边投资条约。事实上,在大多数情况下,它们将条约条款解释为多边制度的一部分。此外,每当一个国家与其他国家一致行动或考虑其他国家投资者的合法利益时,多边主义就出现了。此外,在某些情况下,多边主义已成为强制性的。例如,这是关于可持续发展或气候变化的情况。在这些领域,国际法需要多边主义。各国有义务为实现或促进多边解决办法而进行合作。然而,就国际投资法而言,这种概念并不存在。一般的假设是,各国参与多边做法是由它们自行决定的:是自愿的还是双方同意的。在本文中,我们对这一假设提出质疑。在本文中,我们简要回顾了20世纪国际投资法的多边经验,并在历史背景下对多边主义进行了分析。然后我们将注意力转向当前的事态,以过去的眼光来欣赏它。此外,我们讨论了未来,特别是关于可持续发展的强制性国际法多边主义。在这里,我们确定了可能证明强制性多边办法是合理的原则。最后,我们考虑在国际法中证明强制性多边主义的原则是否也适用于国际投资法。我们试图以肯定的方式回答这个问题,并指出进一步的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Victim Status of Individuals in Climate Change Litigation before the ECtHR State Immunity from Civil Jurisdiction in Transboundary Environmental Litigations The Deterrent Effect of Financial Sanctions Pursuant to Article 260(2) tfeu in the Context of Violations of Environmental Obligations Authorisations to Emit Greenhouse Gases – A Conflict-of-Laws Perspective Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe – J.A. and Others v. Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1