{"title":"Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe – J.A. and Others v. Italy","authors":"Matilde Rocca","doi":"10.1163/27725650-03020019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Countless people have left the African continent seeking to reach European shores via the central Mediterranean Sea route, despite persistent efforts by Italian and EU authorities to counter migratory activities. International and regional human rights judicial bodies have provided some responses to the abuses faced by maritime migrants both at sea and on land throughout the years. In this case note, I analyze the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in J.A. and Others v. Italy concerning the detention of maritime migrants in the Lampedusa hotspot center. To this end, I first illustrate the facts of the case. Second, I assess each claim made by the applicants in relation to the human rights abuses they suffered: inhuman and degrading treatment, arbitrary detention, and collective expulsion of aliens. I conclude that the judgment constitutes an important development in the Court’s case law upholding maritime migrants’ rights, albeit characterized by a few shortcomings. I also argue that the Court’s position as a human rights judicial body needs to be further strengthened in the future.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03020019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Countless people have left the African continent seeking to reach European shores via the central Mediterranean Sea route, despite persistent efforts by Italian and EU authorities to counter migratory activities. International and regional human rights judicial bodies have provided some responses to the abuses faced by maritime migrants both at sea and on land throughout the years. In this case note, I analyze the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in J.A. and Others v. Italy concerning the detention of maritime migrants in the Lampedusa hotspot center. To this end, I first illustrate the facts of the case. Second, I assess each claim made by the applicants in relation to the human rights abuses they suffered: inhuman and degrading treatment, arbitrary detention, and collective expulsion of aliens. I conclude that the judgment constitutes an important development in the Court’s case law upholding maritime migrants’ rights, albeit characterized by a few shortcomings. I also argue that the Court’s position as a human rights judicial body needs to be further strengthened in the future.
尽管意大利和欧盟当局一直在努力打击移民活动,但仍有无数人离开非洲大陆,试图通过地中海中部航线抵达欧洲海岸。多年来,国际和区域人权司法机构对海上移民在海上和陆地上面临的侵权行为做出了一些回应。在本案例说明中,我分析了欧洲人权法院对 J.A. 等人诉意大利一案的判决,该案涉及在兰佩杜萨热点中心拘留海上移民的问题。为此,我首先说明了案件事实。其次,我评估了申诉人提出的与他们遭受的侵犯人权行为有关的每项诉求:不人道和有辱人格的待遇、任意拘留和集体驱逐外国人。我的结论是,该判决是法院维护海上移民权利判例法的重要发展,尽管存在一些缺陷。我还认为,法院作为人权司法机构的地位今后需要进一步加强。