Buch des Gedächtniβ – najstarsza księga miasta Chojnic (1436–1544). Okoliczności powstania i komentarz kodykologiczny

Julia Możdżeń
{"title":"Buch des Gedächtniβ – najstarsza księga miasta Chojnic (1436–1544). Okoliczności powstania i komentarz kodykologiczny","authors":"Julia Możdżeń","doi":"10.26881/sds.2022.25.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contains an analysis of the codicological context and circumstances surrounding the writing of the oldest city record of Chojnice. This volume is the most important source of information about the town’s medieval history. It is in the State Archive in Bydgoszcz in the section devoted to Documents of Chojnice under signature no. 33. The date of its writing has provoked controversy among scholars, as the date of 1436 was often misread as 1466. The author discusses and analyzes the structure of the volume, the phases of its production, and dates the paper on the basis of an analysis of the dating ofthe water marks. These water marks confirm that volume began to be kept in the 1430s and subsequent pages were sown in as the pages of the manuscript were filled up. It is a typical record of entries kept simultaneously by the council and the town court; it was kept through to the 1640s. The introductory section of the volume is unique. There the councilors present in minute detail the motives behind starting it. They call it a book of memory, one that aims to preserve a memory of official matters, court cases, and transactions entered into. The author also considers the circumstances that could have influenced the late establishment of the record – only in 1436 – and points out the self‑awareness of the members of the town council as guardians of the memory of the town’s history.","PeriodicalId":120293,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sds.2022.25.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contains an analysis of the codicological context and circumstances surrounding the writing of the oldest city record of Chojnice. This volume is the most important source of information about the town’s medieval history. It is in the State Archive in Bydgoszcz in the section devoted to Documents of Chojnice under signature no. 33. The date of its writing has provoked controversy among scholars, as the date of 1436 was often misread as 1466. The author discusses and analyzes the structure of the volume, the phases of its production, and dates the paper on the basis of an analysis of the dating ofthe water marks. These water marks confirm that volume began to be kept in the 1430s and subsequent pages were sown in as the pages of the manuscript were filled up. It is a typical record of entries kept simultaneously by the council and the town court; it was kept through to the 1640s. The introductory section of the volume is unique. There the councilors present in minute detail the motives behind starting it. They call it a book of memory, one that aims to preserve a memory of official matters, court cases, and transactions entered into. The author also considers the circumstances that could have influenced the late establishment of the record – only in 1436 – and points out the self‑awareness of the members of the town council as guardians of the memory of the town’s history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这篇文章包含了法典的背景和环境的分析,周围的写作最古老的城市记录Chojnice。这本书是关于这个城镇中世纪历史的最重要的信息来源。它保存在比得哥什国家档案馆的乔尼斯文献专区,署名为:33. 它的写作日期在学者中引起了争议,因为1436年的日期经常被误读为1466年。作者讨论和分析了卷的结构,它的生产阶段,并在分析水标记的年代的基础上确定了论文的年代。这些水渍证实,卷是在14世纪30年代开始保存的,随着手稿的书页被填满,随后的书页也被填满。这是一个典型的记录,由议会和镇法院同时保存;一直保存到17世纪40年代。这本书的引言部分是独一无二的。在那里,议员们详细介绍了启动该计划的动机。他们称之为“记忆之书”,旨在保存有关官方事务、法庭案件和交易的记忆。作者还考虑了可能影响这一记录建立较晚的情况(仅在1436年),并指出镇议会成员作为该镇历史记忆守护者的自我意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Przyczynek do biografii Wawrzyńca Kaszuby Krokowskiego (zm. 1497) Документ і влада на Галицькій Русі пізнього середньовіччя (У зв’язку з монографією Sven Jaros, Integrationen im Grenzraum. Akteure und Felder multikonfessioneller Herrschaftsaushandlung in Kronruthenien (1340–1434), Berlin–Boston 2021 Rejestr listów wypowiednich rycerzy księcia opolskiego Bernarda do wielkiego mistrza zakonu krzyżackiego Michała Küchmeistera z 1414 r. Mistrz Jan – architekt Pałacu Wielkich Mistrzów na zamku malborskim. "Oeuvre" i oryginalny styl wybitnego mistrza budowlanego działającego między 1375 a 1406 r. Kultura materialna w XIV­‑wiecznych testamentach kobiet z hrabstwa Yorkshire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1