임신중단 규제에 대한 국민적 합의의 필요 - 도구성 극복과 휴머니즘 회복 -

손지선
{"title":"임신중단 규제에 대한 국민적 합의의 필요 - 도구성 극복과 휴머니즘 회복 -","authors":"손지선","doi":"10.36999/kjc.2019.31.3.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis worries that the request of the Constitutional Court of 2019.4.11 to the legislature about the improved legislation to penalize a pregnant for terminating the pregnancy after 22-week gestation period may restrict again the right of self determination of female which is acknowledged barely. Therefore this thesis aims to demonstrate that the punishment by the Criminal Law should not be allowed, that the regulation of the abortion by ‘the Criminal Law-the Mother and Child Health Law’ combination format should be abolished and the regulation should be delegated to the nation through the procedure of the substantial national consensus. This thesis tries to establish the correlation of the criminal abortion instrumentalised by the nation with the necessity of the abolition of the law, by applying the Max Horkheimer''s critic of the instrumental reason which seeks to objectify and progress the instrumentation of the reason through its self-criticizm. In order to do supra, this thesis endeavors to expiscate the things ① which the thought process of ‘females are humanbeings’ is removed in the process of acknowledging ‘the right of the fetal life’ as the basis of the existence of the criminal abortion by the court, ② which females are excluded from ‘the right of the human dignity and value’ and ‘the right to pursue happiness’ in the Constitution because of ①, ③ which the two-way race of ‘the right of fetal life vs. the right of self determination of female’ is the output that is missing out ‘the maternal instinct recongnition sensitivity’, and ④ which the content about the deliberation and determination of a pregnant woman for the fatal life and living after the birth is included among the right of self determination of female by proposing ‘the right of fetal profit determination of the pregnant woman’. At last, this thesis attempts to illuminate the things, even if the criminal abortion has to be abolished for the above mentioned reasons, ① which the female-centerd reason has to take care not to disvalue the fetal life through self-criticism, as Horkheimer demands the constant self-criticism of the reason in his denial philosophy, and ② which this thesis counts on the gender community progressing dialectically through interaction toward the gender equality.","PeriodicalId":282156,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal Of Criminology","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal Of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36999/kjc.2019.31.3.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This thesis worries that the request of the Constitutional Court of 2019.4.11 to the legislature about the improved legislation to penalize a pregnant for terminating the pregnancy after 22-week gestation period may restrict again the right of self determination of female which is acknowledged barely. Therefore this thesis aims to demonstrate that the punishment by the Criminal Law should not be allowed, that the regulation of the abortion by ‘the Criminal Law-the Mother and Child Health Law’ combination format should be abolished and the regulation should be delegated to the nation through the procedure of the substantial national consensus. This thesis tries to establish the correlation of the criminal abortion instrumentalised by the nation with the necessity of the abolition of the law, by applying the Max Horkheimer''s critic of the instrumental reason which seeks to objectify and progress the instrumentation of the reason through its self-criticizm. In order to do supra, this thesis endeavors to expiscate the things ① which the thought process of ‘females are humanbeings’ is removed in the process of acknowledging ‘the right of the fetal life’ as the basis of the existence of the criminal abortion by the court, ② which females are excluded from ‘the right of the human dignity and value’ and ‘the right to pursue happiness’ in the Constitution because of ①, ③ which the two-way race of ‘the right of fetal life vs. the right of self determination of female’ is the output that is missing out ‘the maternal instinct recongnition sensitivity’, and ④ which the content about the deliberation and determination of a pregnant woman for the fatal life and living after the birth is included among the right of self determination of female by proposing ‘the right of fetal profit determination of the pregnant woman’. At last, this thesis attempts to illuminate the things, even if the criminal abortion has to be abolished for the above mentioned reasons, ① which the female-centerd reason has to take care not to disvalue the fetal life through self-criticism, as Horkheimer demands the constant self-criticism of the reason in his denial philosophy, and ② which this thesis counts on the gender community progressing dialectically through interaction toward the gender equality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要国民协商中止妊娠的规定,克服工具性,恢复人道主义
本文担心,宪法法院于2019年4月11日要求立法机关完善对怀孕22周后终止妊娠的处罚立法,可能会再次限制女性的自决权,而这一权利几乎没有得到承认。因此,本文旨在论证不应允许刑法处罚,应废除“刑法-母婴保健法”组合形式对堕胎的规定,并通过国民实质性共识的程序将其下放给国家。本文运用霍克海默对工具理性的批判,试图通过理性的自我批判来物化和进步理性的工具,试图建立国家工具化的刑事堕胎与废除法律的必要性之间的关系。为了做超越性的研究,本文试图揭示:①在法院承认“胎儿生命权”作为刑事堕胎存在的基础的过程中,“女性是人”的思想过程被移除;②女性在宪法中被排除在“人的尊严和价值的权利”和“追求幸福的权利”之外;③“胎儿生命权”与“女性自决权”的双向赛跑是遗漏了“母性本能认知敏感性”的输出;④通过提出“孕妇胎儿利益决定权”,将孕妇对产后致命生命和生活的审议和决定内容纳入女性自决权。最后,本文试图阐明,即使基于上述理由必须废除刑事堕胎,以女性为中心的理性也必须注意不通过自我批判来贬低胎儿的生命,因为霍克海默在他的否定哲学中要求理性不断地进行自我批判,而本文所依赖的是性别共同体在相互作用中向性别平等的辩证发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
준강간죄의 불능미수에 대한 고찰 임신중단 규제에 대한 국민적 합의의 필요 - 도구성 극복과 휴머니즘 회복 - 강력범죄 피의자 신상공개제도에 대한 비판적 검토 검찰개혁 이후 수사권 분산의 체계와 과제 -특사경과 자치경찰을 중심으로- 자기도피행위 등에 관여한 행위자의 형사책임
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1