Identifying Success and Tragedy of FLOSS Commons: A Preliminary Classification of Sourceforge.net Projects

Robert C. English, C. Schweik
{"title":"Identifying Success and Tragedy of FLOSS Commons: A Preliminary Classification of Sourceforge.net Projects","authors":"Robert C. English, C. Schweik","doi":"10.1109/FLOSS.2007.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects are a form of commons where individuals work collectively to produce software that is a public, rather than a private, good. The famous phrase \"Tragedy of the Commons\" describes a situation where a natural resource commons, such as a pasture, or a water supply, gets depleted because of overuse. The tragedy in FLOSS commons is distinctly different - it occurs when collective action ceases before a software product is produced or reaches its full potential. This paper builds on previous work about defining success in FLOSS projects by taking a collective action perspective. We first report the results of interviews with FLOSS developers regarding our ideas about success and failure in FLOSS projects. Building on those interviews and previous work, we then describe our criteria for defining success/tragedy in FLOSS commons. Finally, we discuss the results of a preliminary classification of nearly all projects hosted on Sourceforge.net as of August 2006.","PeriodicalId":383068,"journal":{"name":"First International Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development (FLOSS'07: ICSE Workshops 2007)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development (FLOSS'07: ICSE Workshops 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FLOSS.2007.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

Abstract

Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects are a form of commons where individuals work collectively to produce software that is a public, rather than a private, good. The famous phrase "Tragedy of the Commons" describes a situation where a natural resource commons, such as a pasture, or a water supply, gets depleted because of overuse. The tragedy in FLOSS commons is distinctly different - it occurs when collective action ceases before a software product is produced or reaches its full potential. This paper builds on previous work about defining success in FLOSS projects by taking a collective action perspective. We first report the results of interviews with FLOSS developers regarding our ideas about success and failure in FLOSS projects. Building on those interviews and previous work, we then describe our criteria for defining success/tragedy in FLOSS commons. Finally, we discuss the results of a preliminary classification of nearly all projects hosted on Sourceforge.net as of August 2006.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别FLOSS的成功与失败:Sourceforge.net项目的初步分类
自由/自由和开放源代码软件(FLOSS)项目是一种公共形式,个人共同工作,生产公共软件,而不是私有软件。著名的短语“公地悲剧”描述了一种情况,即自然资源的公地,如牧场或供水,由于过度使用而枯竭。在FLOSS公地中的悲剧是明显不同的——当集体行动在软件产品被生产出来或充分发挥其潜力之前停止时,它就会发生。本文建立在先前关于通过采取集体行动的观点来定义FLOSS项目中的成功的工作的基础上。我们首先报告与FLOSS开发人员就我们对FLOSS项目成功和失败的看法进行访谈的结果。在这些访谈和之前的工作的基础上,我们描述了在FLOSS公地中定义成功/悲剧的标准。最后,我们讨论到2006年8月为止Sourceforge.net上托管的几乎所有项目的初步分类结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Software Engineering Processes in Commercial and Community Open Source Projects Identifying Success and Tragedy of FLOSS Commons: A Preliminary Classification of Sourceforge.net Projects Business Firms' Engagement in Community Projects. Empirical Evidence and Further Developments of the Research Do Programming Languages Affect Productivity? A Case Study Using Data from Open Source Projects On Understanding How to Introduce an Innovation to an Open Source Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1