Effect of implementing mobility protocol on selected outcomes among critically ill elderly patients

Saadia Elsalam, WardaY.M. Morsy, Monkez Youseif, Fatma Mohammed
{"title":"Effect of implementing mobility protocol on selected outcomes among critically ill elderly patients","authors":"Saadia Elsalam, WardaY.M. Morsy, Monkez Youseif, Fatma Mohammed","doi":"10.4103/enj.enj_24_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Implementing mobility protocol for critically ill elderly patients may help prevent the sequelae of bed rest and improve patient outcomes. Aim To investigate the effect of implementing mobility protocol on selected outcomes among critically ill elderly patients. Research hypothesis Elderly critically ill patients who will be exposed to predesigned mobility protocol will have an improvement in their selected outcomes than those who will not. Design A quasi-experimental research design was used. Sample A purposive sample consisting of 60 critically ill elderly patients was included in this study within a period of 6 months. Setting This study was conducted at a medical ICU affiliated to a selected university hospital in Zagazig. Tools Two tools were developed, tested for clarity, and feasibility: (a) personal characteristics and medical data, and (b) patient outcome assessment sheet. Results Half (50%) of the control group and study group were males and the other half were females. The majority of study group were in the age group of 60 to less than 70 years. Concerning the past medical history, the majority of the control group and study group had a cardiac problem. The two groups were equal according to the presence of medical problems. In pretest, there were insignificant statistical differences (P>0.05) between the two groups regarding cardiovascular system outcomes. The two groups were equal, except for capillary refill (χ2=4.32, P=0.04). Moreover, more than two-thirds (73.3%) of the control group had sluggish capillary refill compared with 93.3% of the study group, and approximately two-thirds (60%) of the control group had nonpitting edema in the right and left upper arms compared with 36.7% of the study group. In posttest, there were significant statistical differences in cardiovascular system outcomes between study group and control group in peripheral pulses (χ2=4.32, P=0.04), edema of right upper arm (χ2=10.13, P=0.006), edema of left upper arm (χ2=10.13, P=0.006), edema of right lower leg (χ2=5.96, P=0.03), and edema of left lower leg (χ2=4.95, P=0.04). Conclusion Early mobilization and rehabilitation of critically ill elderly patients may help prevent the sequelae of bed rest and improve patient outcomes. Recommendation Integrating mobility protocol into daily nursing care has shown to be imminent. As well, studying the effect of implanting mobility protocol on selected outcomes of critically ill intubated patients. In addition replication of this study on a larger probability sample from the different geographical locations in Egypt is recommended. Replication of this study on a larger probability sample from different geographical locations in Egypt is recommended.","PeriodicalId":149497,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Nursing Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/enj.enj_24_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Implementing mobility protocol for critically ill elderly patients may help prevent the sequelae of bed rest and improve patient outcomes. Aim To investigate the effect of implementing mobility protocol on selected outcomes among critically ill elderly patients. Research hypothesis Elderly critically ill patients who will be exposed to predesigned mobility protocol will have an improvement in their selected outcomes than those who will not. Design A quasi-experimental research design was used. Sample A purposive sample consisting of 60 critically ill elderly patients was included in this study within a period of 6 months. Setting This study was conducted at a medical ICU affiliated to a selected university hospital in Zagazig. Tools Two tools were developed, tested for clarity, and feasibility: (a) personal characteristics and medical data, and (b) patient outcome assessment sheet. Results Half (50%) of the control group and study group were males and the other half were females. The majority of study group were in the age group of 60 to less than 70 years. Concerning the past medical history, the majority of the control group and study group had a cardiac problem. The two groups were equal according to the presence of medical problems. In pretest, there were insignificant statistical differences (P>0.05) between the two groups regarding cardiovascular system outcomes. The two groups were equal, except for capillary refill (χ2=4.32, P=0.04). Moreover, more than two-thirds (73.3%) of the control group had sluggish capillary refill compared with 93.3% of the study group, and approximately two-thirds (60%) of the control group had nonpitting edema in the right and left upper arms compared with 36.7% of the study group. In posttest, there were significant statistical differences in cardiovascular system outcomes between study group and control group in peripheral pulses (χ2=4.32, P=0.04), edema of right upper arm (χ2=10.13, P=0.006), edema of left upper arm (χ2=10.13, P=0.006), edema of right lower leg (χ2=5.96, P=0.03), and edema of left lower leg (χ2=4.95, P=0.04). Conclusion Early mobilization and rehabilitation of critically ill elderly patients may help prevent the sequelae of bed rest and improve patient outcomes. Recommendation Integrating mobility protocol into daily nursing care has shown to be imminent. As well, studying the effect of implanting mobility protocol on selected outcomes of critically ill intubated patients. In addition replication of this study on a larger probability sample from the different geographical locations in Egypt is recommended. Replication of this study on a larger probability sample from different geographical locations in Egypt is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施活动能力方案对危重老年患者选定结局的影响
背景对老年危重患者实施活动能力方案有助于预防卧床休息后遗症,改善患者预后。目的探讨实施活动能力方案对老年危重患者预后的影响。研究假设老年危重病人暴露于预先设计的行动方案将有一个改善他们的选择结果比那些没有。设计采用准实验研究设计。本研究目的样本为60例危重老年患者,为期6个月。本研究在扎加齐格某大学附属医院的ICU进行。开发了两种工具,并对其清晰度和可行性进行了测试:(a)个人特征和医疗数据,以及(b)患者结果评估表。结果对照组和研究组男性各占50%,女性各占一半。大多数研究组的年龄在60岁到70岁以下。既往病史方面,对照组和研究组多数有心脏问题。根据是否存在医疗问题,这两组是平等的。前测时,两组患者心血管系统转归差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除毛细血管再充盈外,两组差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.32, P=0.04)。此外,超过三分之二(73.3%)的对照组有缓慢的毛细血管再充盈,而研究组为93.3%;大约三分之二(60%)的对照组在左右上臂有非点状水肿,而研究组为36.7%。后测时,研究组与对照组的心血管系统转归在外周脉搏(χ2=4.32, P=0.04)、右上臂水肿(χ2=10.13, P=0.006)、左上臂水肿(χ2=10.13, P=0.006)、右下肢水肿(χ2=5.96, P=0.03)、左下肢水肿(χ2=4.95, P=0.04)方面均有统计学差异。结论老年危重症患者早期活动康复有助于预防卧床休息后遗症,改善患者预后。将行动方案纳入日常护理已迫在眉睫。同时,研究移植物移动性方案对危重患者气管插管结局的影响。此外,建议在埃及不同地理位置的更大概率样本上复制这项研究。建议在埃及不同地理位置的更大概率样本上复制这项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preoperative correlates of prolonged postoperative ileus among patients undergoing colorectal surgeries Effect of implementing mobility protocol on selected outcomes among critically ill elderly patients Self-efficacy and adherence to medication and fluid restriction among patients undergoing hemodialysis: a correlational study Relationship Between Staff Nurse Motivation Level and Patient Satisfaction In Selected Hospital and the Appreiviation are Staff Nurse Motivation and Patient Satisfaction Self-esteem of acute leukemic children undergoing chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1