ForceBoard: using force as input technique on size-limited soft keyboard

Min-Chieh Hsiu, Da-Yuan Huang, Chi An Chen, Yu-Chih Lin, Y. Hung, De-Nian Yang, Mike Y. Chen
{"title":"ForceBoard: using force as input technique on size-limited soft keyboard","authors":"Min-Chieh Hsiu, Da-Yuan Huang, Chi An Chen, Yu-Chih Lin, Y. Hung, De-Nian Yang, Mike Y. Chen","doi":"10.1145/2957265.2961827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various typing methods of qwerty-based keyboards on smartwatches have been proposed in recent years. However, since each key can only occupy limited input space and our fingers are too big, recent solutions are mainly two-step typing methods. Users have to navigate the desired key on an enlarged keyboard, and then select the target. The two-step process is distant from our physical keyboard experiences, and requires users to frequently change the keyboard layouts. The aim of this paper is to propose a single-step typing technique that allows users to key in a character with a single touch. We introduce ForceBoard, which combines two adjacent keys into one region and uses force as selecting mechanism. By using that, it not only provides more precise selection, but also allows users to type texts without changing the visual contents of keyboard. We conducted a study comparing the performance of ForceBoard with other two state-of-the-art two-step methods, ZoomBoard and SplitBoard. Our results showed that ForceBoard outperformed ZoomBoard significantly with 30.52% on average, and was slightly better than SplitBoard. Furthermore, ForceBoard also received higher preferences on text speed and satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":131157,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2961827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Various typing methods of qwerty-based keyboards on smartwatches have been proposed in recent years. However, since each key can only occupy limited input space and our fingers are too big, recent solutions are mainly two-step typing methods. Users have to navigate the desired key on an enlarged keyboard, and then select the target. The two-step process is distant from our physical keyboard experiences, and requires users to frequently change the keyboard layouts. The aim of this paper is to propose a single-step typing technique that allows users to key in a character with a single touch. We introduce ForceBoard, which combines two adjacent keys into one region and uses force as selecting mechanism. By using that, it not only provides more precise selection, but also allows users to type texts without changing the visual contents of keyboard. We conducted a study comparing the performance of ForceBoard with other two state-of-the-art two-step methods, ZoomBoard and SplitBoard. Our results showed that ForceBoard outperformed ZoomBoard significantly with 30.52% on average, and was slightly better than SplitBoard. Furthermore, ForceBoard also received higher preferences on text speed and satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
力板:在有尺寸限制的软键盘上使用力作为输入技术
近年来,人们提出了智能手表基于qwerty键盘的各种输入方法。然而,由于每个键只能占用有限的输入空间,我们的手指太大,最近的解决方案主要是两步输入方法。用户必须在放大的键盘上导航所需的键,然后选择目标。这个两步的过程与我们的物理键盘体验相去甚远,并且需要用户经常更改键盘布局。本文的目的是提出一种单步输入技术,允许用户用一次触摸键入一个字符。我们引入了ForceBoard,它将两个相邻的键组合到一个区域中,并使用force作为选择机制。通过使用它,不仅提供了更精确的选择,而且允许用户在不改变键盘视觉内容的情况下输入文本。我们进行了一项研究,比较了ForceBoard与其他两种最先进的两步方法(ZoomBoard和SplitBoard)的性能。我们的结果显示,ForceBoard以平均30.52%的成绩显著优于ZoomBoard,略好于SplitBoard。此外,ForceBoard在文本速度和满意度方面也获得了更高的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobile cross-media visualisations made from building information modelling data Local sounds & singing along in cars Modeling human behavior during touchscreen interaction in mobile situations ForceBoard: using force as input technique on size-limited soft keyboard Baby+: a mobile application to support pregnant women in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1