{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TAXATION OF WASTE DISPOSAL IN EUROPE","authors":"Merve Ergun","doi":"10.5593/sgem2022v/4.2/s18.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxation can be used as a tool to promote sustainable waste management and recycling of industrial plastic, paper and glass; therefore, this article aims to assess the effectiveness of existing waste taxes by considering their effects on waste generation and disposal in Europe. In this context, a comparative study has been carried out to understand taxpayers- behaviours towards waste taxation, tax rates and methods preferred to calculate the amount of tax to be paid. \nSustainable waste management is of particular importance for countries and requires effective investment and financing mechanisms. It can be argued that today-s tax systems are asked to contribute to sustainable development by eradicating poverty, reducing inequalities and using tax incentives to limit the amount of waste produced. This also means that tax systems, from time to time, may require to take more proactive Pigouvian roles. \nCollection of waste tax is mostly under the responsibility of local authorities, and these authorities may opt different methods, such as: Unit-Based Pricing (UBP) and pay-asyou-throw (PAYT) schemes, while calculating the amount of tax to be collected. Pigouvian taxes intend to discourage consumption of products that affect society and/or environment hazardously; therefore, it is argued that the waste taxes that are not inconformity with the Pigouvian approach should be updated because waste taxes should not only finance the service taken by the users(taxpayers), but also promote recycling and protect the environment and human health.","PeriodicalId":234250,"journal":{"name":"22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Energy and Clean Technologies, VOL 22, ISSUE 4.2","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Energy and Clean Technologies, VOL 22, ISSUE 4.2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022v/4.2/s18.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxation can be used as a tool to promote sustainable waste management and recycling of industrial plastic, paper and glass; therefore, this article aims to assess the effectiveness of existing waste taxes by considering their effects on waste generation and disposal in Europe. In this context, a comparative study has been carried out to understand taxpayers- behaviours towards waste taxation, tax rates and methods preferred to calculate the amount of tax to be paid. Sustainable waste management is of particular importance for countries and requires effective investment and financing mechanisms. It can be argued that today-s tax systems are asked to contribute to sustainable development by eradicating poverty, reducing inequalities and using tax incentives to limit the amount of waste produced. This also means that tax systems, from time to time, may require to take more proactive Pigouvian roles. Collection of waste tax is mostly under the responsibility of local authorities, and these authorities may opt different methods, such as: Unit-Based Pricing (UBP) and pay-asyou-throw (PAYT) schemes, while calculating the amount of tax to be collected. Pigouvian taxes intend to discourage consumption of products that affect society and/or environment hazardously; therefore, it is argued that the waste taxes that are not inconformity with the Pigouvian approach should be updated because waste taxes should not only finance the service taken by the users(taxpayers), but also promote recycling and protect the environment and human health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲废物处理税收的比较研究
税收可作为促进可持续废物管理和回收工业塑料、纸张和玻璃的工具;因此,本文旨在通过考虑其对欧洲废物产生和处置的影响来评估现有废物税的有效性。在这方面,进行了一项比较研究,以了解纳税人对废物征税的行为、税率和计算应缴税额的首选方法。可持续废物管理对各国特别重要,需要有效的投资和筹资机制。可以说,今天的税收制度被要求通过消除贫困、减少不平等和使用税收激励措施来限制产生的废物量,从而为可持续发展作出贡献。这也意味着,税收制度可能不时需要发挥更积极主动的庇古式作用。垃圾税的征收主要由地方当局负责,这些当局在计算征收的税额时可能会选择不同的方法,例如:单位定价(UBP)和按扔付费(PAYT)计划。庇古税旨在阻止对社会和/或环境有危险影响的产品的消费;因此,有人认为,不符合庇古方法的废物税应该更新,因为废物税不仅应该为使用者(纳税人)所提供的服务提供资金,而且还应该促进回收利用,保护环境和人类健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPROVEMENT OF SOIL RESILIENCE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES USING DIFFERENT FOOD WASTES AS SOIL AMENDMENTS ITALIAN LEGISLATION IN FORCE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY COMMUNITIES AND CITIZENS EFFECT OF SHARED ELECTRIC SCOOTERS ON URBAN GREEN HOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: CASE OF RIGA INFLUENCE OF GROWN CULTURE ON N2O FORMATION FARM MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IMPACT ON N2O EMISSION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1