Organizations of the nas of Ukraine in scimago institutions rankings (SIR)

I. A. Zhukovych, I. Yehorov
{"title":"Organizations of the nas of Ukraine in scimago institutions rankings (SIR)","authors":"I. A. Zhukovych, I. Yehorov","doi":"10.35668/2520-6524-2019-2-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the absence of a generally accepted system of indicators for assessing the activities of scientific institutions, this problem is relevant. The article discusses the methodology for constructing an international rating of scientific institutions depending on the level of effectiveness of their scientific activities (Scimago), and also considers its use for evaluating the activities of scientific institutions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Article deals with the outcomes of Scimago rating for the institutions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in 2018. According to the results of the rating, the scientific institutions of different countries, which are scientific leaders, as well as the position of scientific institutions of the NAS of Ukraine, are determined. The results of the Scimago 2018 rating are compared with the results of the national assessment of the NAS of Ukraine, conducted in line with the new methodology for assessing the effectiveness of scientific institutions of NAS. It is proved that even the results of bibliometric studies based on popular and approved Scimago-type methods do not provide a definitive understanding of the institution’s activities. At the same time, the results of the rating can be used in conducting national assessments and to confirm the validity of funding institutions. With the correct interpretation, they provide an opportunity to determine the qualitative contribution of the scientific activity of an institution to the development of its industry and science as a whole","PeriodicalId":288625,"journal":{"name":"Science. Technologies. Innovation","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science. Technologies. Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2019-2-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the absence of a generally accepted system of indicators for assessing the activities of scientific institutions, this problem is relevant. The article discusses the methodology for constructing an international rating of scientific institutions depending on the level of effectiveness of their scientific activities (Scimago), and also considers its use for evaluating the activities of scientific institutions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Article deals with the outcomes of Scimago rating for the institutions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in 2018. According to the results of the rating, the scientific institutions of different countries, which are scientific leaders, as well as the position of scientific institutions of the NAS of Ukraine, are determined. The results of the Scimago 2018 rating are compared with the results of the national assessment of the NAS of Ukraine, conducted in line with the new methodology for assessing the effectiveness of scientific institutions of NAS. It is proved that even the results of bibliometric studies based on popular and approved Scimago-type methods do not provide a definitive understanding of the institution’s activities. At the same time, the results of the rating can be used in conducting national assessments and to confirm the validity of funding institutions. With the correct interpretation, they provide an opportunity to determine the qualitative contribution of the scientific activity of an institution to the development of its industry and science as a whole
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰nas组织在scimago机构排名(SIR)
在没有一个普遍接受的评价科学机构活动的指标系统的情况下,这个问题是相关的。本文讨论了根据科学活动的有效性水平(Scimago)构建科学机构国际评级的方法,并考虑了其用于评估乌克兰国家科学院科学机构活动的方法。文章讨论了2018年乌克兰国家科学院机构的Scimago评级结果。根据评级结果,确定了不同国家的科学机构,这些科学机构是科学领导者,以及乌克兰国家科学院科学机构的地位。将Scimago 2018评级的结果与乌克兰NAS的国家评估结果进行比较,该评估是根据评估NAS科学机构有效性的新方法进行的。事实证明,即使是基于流行和认可的scimago型方法的文献计量学研究结果也不能对该机构的活动提供明确的了解。同时,评级结果可用于进行国家评估和确认资助机构的有效性。通过正确的解释,它们提供了一个机会来确定一个机构的科学活动对其工业和整个科学发展的定性贡献
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizations of the nas of Ukraine in scimago institutions rankings (SIR) Scientometric analysis activity in the publication «life sciences» in the world and in Ukraine Integration of Ukraine and the cis countries into the European scientific space: experience of participation in EU framework programs The methodological aspects examination of regional programs of informatization Gray non-pigment glass coatings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1