Performance comparison of CSMA, MACA, Generic MAC and Sensor MAC channel access protocols for ZigBee WSN with RIPv2 as Routing protocol

Narmada Alaparthi, Sudhakara Rao Parvataneni, Neela Venkata Sriya Kanderao, Sri Vidya Jagtap, Alekhya Donthu, Harika Korivi
{"title":"Performance comparison of CSMA, MACA, Generic MAC and Sensor MAC channel access protocols for ZigBee WSN with RIPv2 as Routing protocol","authors":"Narmada Alaparthi, Sudhakara Rao Parvataneni, Neela Venkata Sriya Kanderao, Sri Vidya Jagtap, Alekhya Donthu, Harika Korivi","doi":"10.1109/i-PACT44901.2019.8960033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring and coordinating the remote physical conditions of an environment is found difficult in many user applications. A wireless sensor network can be one of the best solutions in this application. Sensors are inter-connected together in the form of a mesh network to form Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). Transmitter and receiver are embedded in a single sensor called a \"NODE\" in other words called a transceiver, which is a battery operated and microcontroller enabled intelligent device. Further the nodes can also be interconnected in different topologies viz., Star, Ring, Mesh, etc.While many channel access protocols may be competent for using them in Wireless Sensor Networks, it is commonly found that IEEE 802.15.4 MAC (Medium Access Control) protocol is often used over IEEE standard 802.15.4 ZigBee protocol stack. As there are many other protocols reported in literature, it is felt necessary to revisit all the suitable protocols to find, if any, more efficient protocol for WSN exists. In this paper a study is carried out with CSMA, MACA and GENERIC MAC protocols for their suitability for WSN. The study is done by simulating these protocols in 802.15.4 ZigBee for different number of nodes from 15 to 30. The summary of the characteristics of all these protocols is presented. Qualnet 5.0.2 network simulator is employed to analyze the important characteristics like throughput, end-to- end delay, jitter, total packets received, etc., by varying the various parameters under low, medium and heavy loads.","PeriodicalId":214890,"journal":{"name":"2019 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT)","volume":"368 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/i-PACT44901.2019.8960033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Monitoring and coordinating the remote physical conditions of an environment is found difficult in many user applications. A wireless sensor network can be one of the best solutions in this application. Sensors are inter-connected together in the form of a mesh network to form Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). Transmitter and receiver are embedded in a single sensor called a "NODE" in other words called a transceiver, which is a battery operated and microcontroller enabled intelligent device. Further the nodes can also be interconnected in different topologies viz., Star, Ring, Mesh, etc.While many channel access protocols may be competent for using them in Wireless Sensor Networks, it is commonly found that IEEE 802.15.4 MAC (Medium Access Control) protocol is often used over IEEE standard 802.15.4 ZigBee protocol stack. As there are many other protocols reported in literature, it is felt necessary to revisit all the suitable protocols to find, if any, more efficient protocol for WSN exists. In this paper a study is carried out with CSMA, MACA and GENERIC MAC protocols for their suitability for WSN. The study is done by simulating these protocols in 802.15.4 ZigBee for different number of nodes from 15 to 30. The summary of the characteristics of all these protocols is presented. Qualnet 5.0.2 network simulator is employed to analyze the important characteristics like throughput, end-to- end delay, jitter, total packets received, etc., by varying the various parameters under low, medium and heavy loads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RIPv2为路由协议的ZigBee WSN中CSMA、MACA、Generic MAC和Sensor MAC信道访问协议的性能比较
在许多用户应用程序中,很难监控和协调环境的远程物理条件。无线传感器网络可能是此应用中的最佳解决方案之一。传感器以网状网络的形式相互连接,形成无线传感器网络(WSN)。发射器和接收器嵌入在一个称为“NODE”的传感器中,换句话说,称为收发器,这是一个电池供电和微控制器启用的智能设备。此外,节点也可以在不同的拓扑结构中互连,即星型,环形,网状等。虽然许多通道访问协议可能能够在无线传感器网络中使用它们,但通常发现IEEE 802.15.4 MAC(介质访问控制)协议通常在IEEE标准802.15.4 ZigBee协议堆栈上使用。由于文献中报道了许多其他协议,因此有必要重新审视所有合适的协议,以找到更有效的WSN协议。本文对CSMA、MACA和GENERIC MAC协议在无线传感器网络中的适用性进行了研究。本研究通过在802.15.4 ZigBee中模拟这些协议,在15到30个节点的不同数量下完成。对这些协议的特点进行了总结。使用Qualnet 5.0.2网络模拟器,通过改变低、中、重负载下的各种参数,分析吞吐量、端到端延迟、抖动、接收总包数等重要特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Feasible Proposal for Small Capacity Solar Power Generation at Phu Quoc, Viet Nam Design of Human Detection Robot for Natural calamity Rescue Operation Feature Extraction for Bearing Fault Diagnosis in Noisy Environment: A Study Analysis and Evaluation of Integrated Cyber Crime Offences Use of Channel State Information for Suspicious Object Detection: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1