Using Mediational Means during Learning and Understanding of Proof Assignments from Theory of Computation

Christiane Frede
{"title":"Using Mediational Means during Learning and Understanding of Proof Assignments from Theory of Computation","authors":"Christiane Frede","doi":"10.1145/3105726.3105734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a lack of empirically validated studies about how students solve proof assignments in their Theory of Computation (ToC) courses. I want to get detailed insights about the nature of students' difficulties with this field of computer science (CS). To gather data, I want to perform several qualitative studies investigating how undergraduate CS majors solve assignments in individually-formed study groups. I will use Distributed Cognition Theory (DCOG) as the underlying theoretical framework and understand cognitive processes as an interplay between several humans, their environment, resources and tools/mediational means. In the context of ToC, tools/mediational means are all mathematical inscriptions, definitions and concepts as well as natural language or physical media like pen & paper or whiteboards. The goal of this dissertation is to understand how student groups use provided and their own mediational means and whether they are successful during solving proof assignments.","PeriodicalId":267640,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3105734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a lack of empirically validated studies about how students solve proof assignments in their Theory of Computation (ToC) courses. I want to get detailed insights about the nature of students' difficulties with this field of computer science (CS). To gather data, I want to perform several qualitative studies investigating how undergraduate CS majors solve assignments in individually-formed study groups. I will use Distributed Cognition Theory (DCOG) as the underlying theoretical framework and understand cognitive processes as an interplay between several humans, their environment, resources and tools/mediational means. In the context of ToC, tools/mediational means are all mathematical inscriptions, definitions and concepts as well as natural language or physical media like pen & paper or whiteboards. The goal of this dissertation is to understand how student groups use provided and their own mediational means and whether they are successful during solving proof assignments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学习和理解《计算理论》证明作业中的中介方法
关于学生如何在计算理论(ToC)课程中解决证明作业,缺乏经验验证的研究。我想详细了解学生在计算机科学(CS)领域遇到的困难的本质。为了收集数据,我想进行几项定性研究,调查计算机科学专业本科生如何在个人组成的学习小组中解决作业。我将使用分布式认知理论(DCOG)作为基础理论框架,并将认知过程理解为几个人,他们的环境,资源和工具/中介手段之间的相互作用。在ToC的背景下,工具/中介手段都是数学铭文、定义和概念,以及自然语言或物理媒介,如笔、纸或白板。本论文的目的是了解学生团体如何使用提供的和他们自己的中介手段,以及他们在解决证明作业时是否成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hack.edu: Examining How College Hackathons Are Perceived By Student Attendees and Non-Attendees Comparison of Time Metrics in Programming Sometimes, Rainfall Accumulates: Talk-Alouds with Novice Functional Programmers Tools to Support Data-driven Reflective Learning Using Mediational Means during Learning and Understanding of Proof Assignments from Theory of Computation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1