{"title":"Elites","authors":"Dana Fields","doi":"10.4324/9780429292170-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The leadership represents a “personalization of power”. The expansion of mass media communications (specially the television) led to the prominence of leader’s direct activities. Here we try to search the influence of the leader in the political life and his relation with political elites. The oscillations of the vote between different elections are better explained by temporal factors (as political valuation of the candidates or appreciation to the political party) than structural factors as social class. In sum, it is proved the influence of the leader as a decisive factor in the explication of the vote’s behaviour.","PeriodicalId":166942,"journal":{"name":"Frankness, Greek Culture, and the Roman Empire","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frankness, Greek Culture, and the Roman Empire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429292170-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The leadership represents a “personalization of power”. The expansion of mass media communications (specially the television) led to the prominence of leader’s direct activities. Here we try to search the influence of the leader in the political life and his relation with political elites. The oscillations of the vote between different elections are better explained by temporal factors (as political valuation of the candidates or appreciation to the political party) than structural factors as social class. In sum, it is proved the influence of the leader as a decisive factor in the explication of the vote’s behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英
领导层代表着“权力的个人化”。大众传播媒介(特别是电视)的扩大,使领导人的直接活动更加突出。在此,我们试图探寻领袖在政治生活中的影响及其与政治精英的关系。不同选举之间的选票波动可以用时间因素(如对候选人的政治评价或对政党的赞赏)来更好地解释,而不是社会阶层等结构性因素。综上所述,证明了领导者的影响是解释投票行为的决定性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elites Conclusion Authorizing frankness Dēmos Kings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1