Voting tools to support convergence process in collaboration

Kung-E. Cheng, F. Deek
{"title":"Voting tools to support convergence process in collaboration","authors":"Kung-E. Cheng, F. Deek","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2014.063356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineers, like others working in group settings, face several challenges in collaboration. One of the challenges is converging to a final decision. Group support systems (GSS) can support engineers in making decisions. GSS researchers and facilitators of group meetings recognise that implementing convergence processes in groups is a most demanding task. Voting, when used properly, can be a great aid in the convergence process. To reap the full benefit of voting in group decision, the computation and communication capabilities in GSS must be used when building voting tools. In this paper, we describe the functional requirements of sophisticated voting tools for collaboration based on prevailing theories and the functionality of existing voting tools. These considerations can serve as guidelines for the design and development of the next generation voting tools. \n \nEngineers, like others working in group settings, face several challenges in collaboration. One of the challenges is converging to a final decision. Group support systems (GSS) can support engineers in making decisions. GSS researchers and facilitators of group meetings recognise that implementing convergence processes in groups is a most demanding task. Voting, when used properly, can be a great aid in the convergence process. To reap the full benefit of voting in group decision, the computation and communication capabilities in GSS must be used when building voting tools. In this paper, we describe the functional requirements of sophisticated voting tools for collaboration based on prevailing theories and the functionality of existing voting tools. These considerations can serve as guidelines for the design and development of the next generation voting tools.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2014.063356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engineers, like others working in group settings, face several challenges in collaboration. One of the challenges is converging to a final decision. Group support systems (GSS) can support engineers in making decisions. GSS researchers and facilitators of group meetings recognise that implementing convergence processes in groups is a most demanding task. Voting, when used properly, can be a great aid in the convergence process. To reap the full benefit of voting in group decision, the computation and communication capabilities in GSS must be used when building voting tools. In this paper, we describe the functional requirements of sophisticated voting tools for collaboration based on prevailing theories and the functionality of existing voting tools. These considerations can serve as guidelines for the design and development of the next generation voting tools. Engineers, like others working in group settings, face several challenges in collaboration. One of the challenges is converging to a final decision. Group support systems (GSS) can support engineers in making decisions. GSS researchers and facilitators of group meetings recognise that implementing convergence processes in groups is a most demanding task. Voting, when used properly, can be a great aid in the convergence process. To reap the full benefit of voting in group decision, the computation and communication capabilities in GSS must be used when building voting tools. In this paper, we describe the functional requirements of sophisticated voting tools for collaboration based on prevailing theories and the functionality of existing voting tools. These considerations can serve as guidelines for the design and development of the next generation voting tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投票工具支持协作中的融合过程
工程师和其他在团队中工作的人一样,在合作中面临着一些挑战。其中一个挑战是最终的决定。群体支持系统(GSS)可以为工程师的决策提供支持。GSS研究人员和小组会议的主持人认识到,在小组中实施趋同过程是一项最艰巨的任务。如果使用得当,投票可以在趋同过程中起到很大的帮助作用。为了在组决策中获得投票的全部好处,在构建投票工具时必须使用GSS中的计算和通信功能。在本文中,我们基于主流理论和现有投票工具的功能描述了复杂投票工具的功能需求。这些考虑可以作为设计和开发下一代投票工具的指导方针。工程师和其他在团队中工作的人一样,在合作中面临着一些挑战。其中一个挑战是最终的决定。群体支持系统(GSS)可以为工程师的决策提供支持。GSS研究人员和小组会议的主持人认识到,在小组中实施趋同过程是一项最艰巨的任务。如果使用得当,投票可以在趋同过程中起到很大的帮助作用。为了在组决策中获得投票的全部好处,在构建投票工具时必须使用GSS中的计算和通信功能。在本文中,我们基于主流理论和现有投票工具的功能描述了复杂投票工具的功能需求。这些考虑可以作为设计和开发下一代投票工具的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning objects for collaborative learning in engineering programmes A study on conflicts during an interdisciplinary capstone design experience Voting tools to support convergence process in collaboration A guidance framework for facilitating effective engineering student teams and its impact on individual learning Engineering students’ perceptions of team conflict and high-performance teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1