An analysis of the policy coverage and examination of environmental-impact topics

S. B. Msezane
{"title":"An analysis of the policy coverage and examination of environmental-impact topics","authors":"S. B. Msezane","doi":"10.4314/SAJEE.V.33I1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental education and education for sustainability are educational responses to negative environmental impacts both locally and globally. In South Africa, the schooling sector has experienced several shifts in the curriculum since 1994, with implications for the coverage, teaching and examination of environmental-impact topics in subjects such as Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Life Orientation, Agricultural Sciences, and Geography. The aim of the research reported here was to investigate the coverage and examination of environmental-impact topics in the Further Education and Training (FET) Phase of the South African school curriculum. Data sources were the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) documents and examination papers. In analysing the coverage and examination of environmental-impact topics, thematic content analysis was used. The findings indicate that there is unequal coverage of environmental-impact topics in the curriculum, despite the CAPS indicating that environmental content should feature in all subjects. The present paper shows that Life Sciences has the widest coverage and that Geography examination papers sometimes exceed the policy allocation. Agricultural Sciences has the least coverage. The study also found that there is general, but not complete, alignment between policy and examination papers. The study concluded that there is too little focus in the FET curriculum on environmental education and warns that this will constrain the development of a pro-environmental culture among learners. This has relevance for curriculum and policy developers in responding to societal and environmental issues. Keywords: Environmental education, education for sustainable development, environmental-impact topics, curriculum","PeriodicalId":272843,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJEE.V.33I1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Environmental education and education for sustainability are educational responses to negative environmental impacts both locally and globally. In South Africa, the schooling sector has experienced several shifts in the curriculum since 1994, with implications for the coverage, teaching and examination of environmental-impact topics in subjects such as Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Life Orientation, Agricultural Sciences, and Geography. The aim of the research reported here was to investigate the coverage and examination of environmental-impact topics in the Further Education and Training (FET) Phase of the South African school curriculum. Data sources were the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) documents and examination papers. In analysing the coverage and examination of environmental-impact topics, thematic content analysis was used. The findings indicate that there is unequal coverage of environmental-impact topics in the curriculum, despite the CAPS indicating that environmental content should feature in all subjects. The present paper shows that Life Sciences has the widest coverage and that Geography examination papers sometimes exceed the policy allocation. Agricultural Sciences has the least coverage. The study also found that there is general, but not complete, alignment between policy and examination papers. The study concluded that there is too little focus in the FET curriculum on environmental education and warns that this will constrain the development of a pro-environmental culture among learners. This has relevance for curriculum and policy developers in responding to societal and environmental issues. Keywords: Environmental education, education for sustainable development, environmental-impact topics, curriculum
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对政策范围的分析和对环境影响主题的审查
环境教育和可持续发展教育是对地方和全球负面环境影响的教育反应。在南非,自1994年以来,教育部门的课程经历了几次转变,这对生命科学、物理科学、生命导向、农业科学和地理等学科的环境影响主题的覆盖、教学和考试产生了影响。这里报告的研究目的是调查南非学校课程继续教育和培训阶段对环境影响主题的覆盖范围和审查情况。数据来源是课程和评估政策声明(CAPS)文件和试卷。在分析环境影响专题的范围和审查时,采用了专题内容分析。调查结果表明,尽管CAPS表明环境内容应在所有科目中都有特色,但课程中环境影响主题的覆盖范围不平等。本研究表明,生命科学的考卷覆盖范围最广,地理考卷有时超过政策分配。农业科学的覆盖率最低。该研究还发现,政策和考卷之间存在普遍但不完全的一致性。该研究得出的结论是,FET课程对环境教育的关注太少,并警告说这将限制学习者中亲环境文化的发展。这与课程和政策制定者应对社会和环境问题有关。关键词:环境教育;可持续发展教育;环境影响主题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating Environmental Awareness using an Eco-Feedback Application at a Higher Education Institution The Practice of Environmental Training: A case of ISO 14001 Certified Businesses in Durban, South Africa Use of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Crop and Livestock Production and Implication to Social Ecology: A Case Study of Chimanimani District of Zimbabwe Challenges of Teaching Akans (Ghana) Culturally-Specific Environmental Ethics in Senior High Schools: Voices of Akans and Biology Teachers Territory and ontology in the educational practices of an indigenous Zapotecan community in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1