Initial Management Of Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia In A Tertiary Hospital In Sri Lanka

R. Haniffa, H. Ariyaratne, S. D. Fernando, S. Rajapakse
{"title":"Initial Management Of Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia In A Tertiary Hospital In Sri Lanka","authors":"R. Haniffa, H. Ariyaratne, S. D. Fernando, S. Rajapakse","doi":"10.4038/SLJCC.V1I1.941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"12.00 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Table Normal\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-qformat:yes; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0in; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \n font-size:11.0pt; \n font-family:\"Calibri\",\"sans-serif\"; \n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-fareast-font-family:\"Times New Roman\"; \n mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; \n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\"; \n mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} \n Introduction: We studied the choice of antibiotic/s prescribed on admission and microbiological investigations, in patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia, and compared such choice with published consensus guidelines. Methods:  Adult patients admitted to medical wards of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka with clinical features of pneumonia, with subsequent radiological confirmation, were eligible for inclusion (n=112). Patients who had been in hospital within 10 days of admission, and those with diagnoses of lung malignancy, lung fibrosis, bronchiectasis or tuberculosis were excluded. We obtained data from the patients' case records regarding indicators of severity, the antibiotic prescribed on admission, and route of administration. The microbiological investigations performed were also recorded. We compared the practices with guidelines for management of community-acquired pneumonia published by the British Thoracic Society in 2001. Results: The respiratory rate, a core clinical adverse prognostic feature, was documented in only 13% of case records. Oral amoxicillin was the most common antibiotic prescribed on admission, with 29% of hospitalized patients receiving it. Erythromycin was included in the drug regimen in only 18% of all patients. Intravenous antibiotics were started for 44% of cases without any documented adverse prognostic features on admission. Sputum was sent for acid-fast bacilli staining in 48% of patients and for bacterial culture in 11%. Blood culture was performed in 5% of patients. Conclusion: Documentation of severity criteria is often incomplete. There is inadequate utilization of oral macrolide antibiotics to cover atypical pathogens. Intravenous antibiotics are overused in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. DOI: 10.4038/sljcc.v1i1.941","PeriodicalId":184615,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Critical Care","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJCC.V1I1.941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

12.00 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Introduction: We studied the choice of antibiotic/s prescribed on admission and microbiological investigations, in patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia, and compared such choice with published consensus guidelines. Methods:  Adult patients admitted to medical wards of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka with clinical features of pneumonia, with subsequent radiological confirmation, were eligible for inclusion (n=112). Patients who had been in hospital within 10 days of admission, and those with diagnoses of lung malignancy, lung fibrosis, bronchiectasis or tuberculosis were excluded. We obtained data from the patients' case records regarding indicators of severity, the antibiotic prescribed on admission, and route of administration. The microbiological investigations performed were also recorded. We compared the practices with guidelines for management of community-acquired pneumonia published by the British Thoracic Society in 2001. Results: The respiratory rate, a core clinical adverse prognostic feature, was documented in only 13% of case records. Oral amoxicillin was the most common antibiotic prescribed on admission, with 29% of hospitalized patients receiving it. Erythromycin was included in the drug regimen in only 18% of all patients. Intravenous antibiotics were started for 44% of cases without any documented adverse prognostic features on admission. Sputum was sent for acid-fast bacilli staining in 48% of patients and for bacterial culture in 11%. Blood culture was performed in 5% of patients. Conclusion: Documentation of severity criteria is often incomplete. There is inadequate utilization of oral macrolide antibiotics to cover atypical pathogens. Intravenous antibiotics are overused in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. DOI: 10.4038/sljcc.v1i1.941
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡一家三级医院社区获得性肺炎患者的初步管理
12.00 Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */表。mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size: 0;mso-tstyle-colband-size: 0;mso-style-noshow:是的;mso-style-priority: 99;mso-style-qformat:是的;mso-style-parent:“”;mso- font - family:宋体;mso-para-margin: 0;mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt;mso-pagination: widow-orphan;字体大小:11.0分;字体类型:“Calibri”、“无衬线”;mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:宋体;mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:宋体;前言:我们研究了社区获得性肺炎住院患者入院时抗生素处方的选择和微生物学调查,并将这种选择与已发表的共识指南进行了比较。方法:斯里兰卡国立医院内科病房收治的具有肺炎临床特征并经放射学证实的成年患者(n=112)符合纳入条件。排除入院10天内住院的患者,以及诊断为肺恶性肿瘤、肺纤维化、支气管扩张或结核病的患者。我们从患者的病例记录中获得了关于严重程度指标、入院时处方的抗生素和给药途径的数据。还记录了所进行的微生物调查。我们将这些做法与2001年英国胸科学会发布的社区获得性肺炎管理指南进行了比较。结果:呼吸频率,一个核心的临床不良预后特征,只有13%的病例记录被记录。口服阿莫西林是入院时最常见的抗生素处方,29%的住院患者接受了它。只有18%的患者将红霉素纳入药物治疗方案。入院时无任何不良预后特征的44%的病例开始静脉注射抗生素。48%的患者送痰进行抗酸杆菌染色,11%的患者送痰进行细菌培养。5%的患者进行了血培养。结论:严重程度标准的文件通常是不完整的。口服大环内酯类抗生素用于治疗非典型病原体的使用不足。社区获得性肺炎住院患者静脉注射抗生素被过度使用。DOI: 10.4038 / sljcc.v1i1.941
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax in a child Carbapenem induced convulsions in the critically ill – A case series. Outcome correlation of change in CRP levels and APACHE II in critically sick patients Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genotypes in patients developing pulmonary tuberculosis related acute respiratory distress syndrome Pediatric workload in a multi-disciplinary tertiary care intensive care unit in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1